If you want to argue that it’s not possible that’s fine, but don’t misrepresent my article as a blanket indictment on all forms of polygamy and all “negro-like behaviors.”

Just who is going to raise the children who are produced in such illegitimate unions? Who, especially with the boys, are going to have the time and resources to be the proper male role model’s in their developing lives? In *modern-day* society, the type of behaviour you are alluding to by these men definately does include and exhibit Negro-like behaviour and irresponsibility, and absentee-”fatherhood”.

Please read this whole link on how this works out in the real world today for so many men, including “high-status” ones. (I know it’s written by the blogger Whiskey, but he makes some great points) -

http://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2009/09/ashley-madison-marriage-redefined.html

Are you saying that King Solomon, Brigham Young, and Niall of the Nine Hostages were engaged in “negro-like” behavior? These were the quintessential alpha males: patriarchs. If we continue to congratulate ourselves as being unique for having an anemic and dysgenic reproductive pattern, as you and KMac seem inclined to do, then we’ll congratulate ourselves into the dust.

[...] But even though they are doing their best to be supernigga, they still do things in a feminine way because feminine influences are most of what they know. Most of their role models and involved family members are women, and the few men in their lives were likely raised by only women too. And it shows in how they handle conflict: grudges are held forever, they never know how to let anything slide, they think primarily with emotion and are prone to outbursts, drama and confrontation and most importantly, they don’t know how to choose their battles. True male behavior isn’t being a drama queen, being highly prone to emotional outbursts and holding onto grudges; true male behavior is picking your battles, knowing when to fight and when to let things slide, analyzing things calmly and logically and having discipline over your moods and emotions and exercising emotional restraint. These are things that a true alpha male influence teaches you, and such influences have almost disappeared completely from the hood. [...]

http://therawness.com/myth-of-the-ghetto-alpha-male/

~

——————————————————————————–

“In general, cultural uniqueness could derive from either nature or nurture—the same old ageless dichotomy, but I think now we are in a better position to deal with these issues than in times past, and I will be arguing that both are important. Western cultures have experienced certain unique cultural transformations that cannot be predicted by any biological/evolutionary theory, but they also have had a unique evolutionary history. Western culture was built by people who differ genetically from those who have built the other civilizations and cultures of the world. In the following I will argue that Western cultures have a unique cultural profile compared to other traditional civilizations:

1. The Catholic Church and Christianity.
2. A tendency toward monogamy.
3. A tendency toward simple family structure based on the nuclear family.
4. A greater tendency for marriage to be companionate and based on mutual affection of the partners.
5. A de-emphasis on extended kinship relationships and its correlative, a relative lack of ethnocentrism.
6. A tendency toward individualism and all of its implications: individual rights against the state, representative government, moral universalism, and science.

[...]

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/West-TOQ.htm

When individuals espouse ideological positions, we typically interpret their beliefs as signs of good or bad moral character. . . . Political correctness is one outcome of such attributions. For example, if a scientist says, “I have evidence that human intelligence is genetically heritable,” that is usually misinterpreted as proclaiming, “I am a disagreeable psychopath unworthy of love.” The arbiters of ideological correctness can create the impression that belief A must indicate personality trait X. If X is considered sexually and socially repulsive, then belief A becomes taboo. In this way our sexually selected instincts for moralistic self-advertisement become subverted into ideological dogmas.

He then adds that “I think that human rationality consists largely of separating intellectual arguments from personality attributions about moral character.” Miller must understand that he’s a Darwinian rarity.

Am I the disagreeable psychopath unworthy of love or am I simply rejecting the mentally illogical or unstable. They have made the wrong choice and they will become extinct. I am seeing a growing number of white females with mixed race children, this is proof of their unfit condition for continuing life. Do not misunderstand me here, I see this as a good development since all living organisms must excrete their waste.

The only thing that makes humans special is that the sexually selective design pattern of male territorial aggression happened to manifest in the form of strategy and weaponry design rather than enlarged tusks, fangs, or antlers. This resulted in a race condition where human males competed to be more intelligent than other human males in military combat, with the most intelligent and successful becoming military warlords and acquiring the most fair and delightsome females from their own and vanquished tribes.

Further compounding this race condition was the fact that selection for increased intelligence had the side-effect of empowering those populations to innovate in ways that gave them even more time to devote to sexual selection in the form of territorial aggression for more intelligent and fair populations.

The most successful man in the world is the offspring of a gifted polygamist who made a point of acquiring the most fair mates possible. The second most intelligent and attractive person in that same competition was also the product of polygamists. The only white racialists in the entire world who are increasing in numbers and influence are polygamists.

–

Should be called the “Nordish Babblers” instead.

he hits all the standard points: anti-populism, anti-White, anti-grassroots, race denialism, pro-elitism, and so on.