Comments on: Jared Taylor on “The Silent Catastrophe”

By: John Boye

John Boye — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:48:40 +0000

I first came across Mr Taylor in TOQ. I was particularly impressed with a (poorly attended) press conference where he outlined a rock-solid analysis of the disproportionate black/white crime facts. However, despite his claims at the conference that he did not see race as a determining factor, I get a different impression from his American Renaissance website. This is a (highly entertaining) collection of news reports highlighting typical black behaviour and crime and, increasingly, alleged Muslim intolerance of, for instance, Christian symbols. However, his website does not ever publish anything critical of typical Jewish anti-social behaviour – which as TOQ readers will know is endemic and designed to sow chaos discord in the host community and thus increase the power of their own highly networked group. I find this puzzling. No solution can ever be found if a primal cause is, deliberately ignored. I Include parts of a piece by Mr Taylor entitled ‘Jews and American Renaissance’ of May 2006 from the Amren website. Please read the whole piece. My appreciation of Mr Taylor’s – still entertaining – output has certainly changed somewhat.

AR has likewise taken no explicit position on Jewish matters. Readers have always included both Jews and people who believe Jews play no useful role in a movement that promotes white interests. It has been my intent to emphasize questions crucial to our interests and on which we agree.

…AR has taken an implicit position on Jews by publishing Jewish authors and inviting Jewish speakers to AR conferences. It should be clear to anyone that Jews have, from the outset, been welcome and equal participants in our efforts.

…Jews have a valuable role in the work of American Renaissance, and are welcome participants and speakers. Anyone who thinks otherwise has the choice of staying home or keeping his views to himself.

By: John Nada

John Nada — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:06:14 +0000

I think programs like “No Child Left Behind” have more to do with population management and indoctrination than any real desire on the part of the overclass to improve the abilities of their subjects.

The fact is our rulers WANT to reduce the quality of the American workforce.

Anybody who reads the major financial rags (Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, etc.) can tell you that the “Masters of the Universe” have been bitching and moaning about “spoiled” Western (white) workers for a very long time.

NCLB is class warfare in the form of multicultural “education”.

By: Steven E. Romer

Steven E. Romer — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:04:35 +0000

Wow, this article is amazing. Jared has his fog lights on here, and they cut right through the misty, purposeful darkness of politically-correct ignorance. We get science, facts, figures — which allow us to see clearly the reality of why the USA is dropping from the top of the list of educated nations so rapidly. We are wasting too much money on “no child left behind” strategies which are just ignorant feel-good rhetoric from our legislators. Instead of improving education, this program forces schools to adjust tests and standards to meet impossible goals. Schools get WORSE, in other words. Nice way to spend money. The most expensive educational program of all time, however, was the Head-Start program. After a few years, ALL the tiny benefits seen early on evaporated. So did the money spent as a result of these perennial politically-correct and quite erroneous explanations for performance differentials. If we had spent similar sums on positive eugenic incentives, the benefits would have been large, real, and lasting.