The line that brought tears to my eyes was this one- because it’s true. “And if an adorable blonde two-year-old squealing “daddy” and running into your arms when you get home from work isn’t enough, take a darker view: Your race is dying, White people. Resuscitate, stat.”

Even Franz Liszt, the great piano virtuoso, wrote a song on the Italian text, ‘Angiolin dal biondo crin” [Angel fair with golden hair]. What I’m saying is, it’s not only genetic, emotional, it’s clearly cultural as well.. for Europeans.

Nothing – I repeat- NOTHING- is as precious as that little buddy or princess tackling you with unabashed joy (and the closest thing to worship a human dare experience) as your children do, at the end of the day.

As a cleric, I can ALSO say, that without children, the Church will DIE. No amount of ‘multiculturalizing’ or ‘inculturation’ will KEEP Christendom alive, as the need for, and the supra-organic blessing of children in the Body of Christ. They truly are the ‘arrows in your quiver’ and the ‘joy of your heart,’ forever.

Furthermore, the majority of whites today are not merely culturally or spiritually undesirable, they are also physically unattractive. 60% of them are overweight, and the remaining 40% would still probably benefit from a little exercise themselves. Then you have the fact that people today dress very poorly and have a generally ’sloppy’ appearance. Look at photographs of people from several generations ago and you’ll basically the opposite situation — loads of good-looking, thin, well-dressed people who are ready for the real world at much younger ages…

The simple fact is that most whites are just not marriage material, whether they be male or female…

Strawman.

A proper White man or woman?
What century are you living in?

Appeal to chronological snobbery.

Now, I’m not particularly interested in addresings the remainder of your attack at length, consisting, as it does, of much the same sort of fallacious hyperventilation as I’ve pointed out above. Suffice it say that the vehemence of the emotional appeals you’ve substituted for arguments, and the obvious, and rather ironic, desire to forcibly conform me to a pre-conceived type of your own merely reinforces my point that this practice of focusing on the self is ultimately deleterious, both to the self, itself, and to the broader community.

Could you explain this please?

Do you actually think it’s possible for any human being to live without a sense of value, which is what validation means?
Are they only capable, or allowed, to acheive it by being a good White person? By being an anonymous member of a category, and not as an Individual?
And is there only one definition of what a good White person is?

“The self is the last of all considerations for a proper white man or woman.”

A proper White man or woman?
What century are you living in?
Did it ever occur to you that Whites are in a dilema of their own making?
Or are you content to blame Jews and the Left for everything?
Did it ever occur to you that there might be consequences, serious emotional and psychological consequences for denying the Self and forcing children, adolescents and adults to live their lives playing out a Role, so they can satisfy the expectations of people like you?
How do you expect to be taken seriously?
Do you know anything about Family Systems Theory?
Do you think it was created to hurt Whites? It’s one of the few reliable things out there that could actually help us.

More importantly, how do you expect to inspire other Whites by giving silly, historically regressive commandments from your little hilltop?
What if by some miracle we are successful in restoring ourselves to power?
Are you prepared to dismiss those who want a healthy Self as post-modern kooks, the way Jews demonize dissenters by slandering them as anti-semites?

One could just as easily say that prating on about “duty” is pre-modern authoritarian clap-trap.

What is a couple supposed to do once they’ve satisfied their duty to their Race?
Just sit there and be White? Perhaps you’d be happier in China, or a Lighthouse.

I also don’t think you sound like much of an authority on the Self.
Could you describe it please? Could you locate it’s origins?
Do you really believe the concept of the Self was created to destroy Whites?
It was created by Whites! Why? To satisfy a desire deep within them, us, that no other Race shares, or has – the desire for Spiritual Growth.

Haven’t you ever been to the Metropolitan Museum of Art?
It’s a virtual monument to our desire as a Race to grow along spiritual lines.

There’s no reason that desire can not be extended to the Individual as a gift received From the Family. This would help us, not hurt us.
That the word “Self” has been hijacked and distorted by the Left is not in question.
They did the same thing with the word “Diversity”.
But it’s still no argument against the real thing.

Good article, but the married bit is wayoff. I am single woman who has been married and as nice as it was I love my single life. I have no stress, I have money and lovely home and car and friends. I dont need a marriage to validate myself and given a choice I will opt for single life.

You seem to be missing the author’s point. “Validating” yourself is post-modernist, anti-white claptrap. You owe a duty to your family and your race. The self is the last of all considerations for a proper white man or woman.

Eriksson:

Instead of church one might want to connect with the majority of their bloodline, which was (and can be again!) Heathen.

Instead of indulging in romantic day-dreaming of a neo-pagan revival, one might want to realize that the majority of one’s bloodline is still effectively Christian. Energy exerted on “traditional” religions is wasted. The pre-Christian pagan conceptions of deities is not something that’s ever going to be taken seriously by any significant number of people in these days, nor would it be useful for white nationalists even if it was, as tribal gods lack the unitive aspect of Christendom.

MJC