What wonderful “white” words — “game” and this admonition:

“And for God’s sake, get laid.”

Is that straight from Ice Cube or something?

When is TOQ going to start returning to its older standards of high quality at least semi-scholarly journalism and stop showcasing the unsubstantiated blathering of disassociated 20-something single men who blame women, brainwashing, for a very real and racially-positive Darwinian rejection of them as just substandard mate choices?

Your revisionist phallic-centric view of history is incredible. It’s always amazing to me how the least cognizant of the female psyche are always the ones so quick to write about it, and so emphatic about their “expert” status on the subject.

And then TOQ authors lament the lack of participation of women. Try muzzling your inexperienced, inaccurate, immature authors, who don’t even realize the misogyny they spew through foot-in-mouth disease.

But senior editors certainly should know better.

L.C.

If you include nonwhite women in that “new race,” it will not be a race worth preserving, nor will it even be one capable of emulating the Templars. No Templar was a genetically debased mongrel.

As f0r “we shouldn’t have to worry about game,” one could say that we shouldn’t have to worry about the flu virus, either. But we do, so we adapt.

Never before in history, both in the world, and especially in Our History, has social relationships between men and women been so profoundly retarded and dysfunctional, especially for the ‘common man’. Much of this blame rests squarely on the shoulders of misandric Marxism, aka ‘Feminism’, and much of what Michael calls and advocates for is a healthy rebalancing of the (severly) disordered gender roles and imbalance of power that has been the result.

However, I would hope that most of these tactics are only going to be potentially necessary in the short-term … ideally strengthening, and leading to long term pair bonding relationships between White men and women, so they can go about creating the basis for sane, healthy White families, the future of Our Progeny.

Hence, Monagamy should always be Our Ideal. Short of an emergency or catastrophic conditions, such as a severe loss of males in war or famine, or like the contemporary loss of so many good men in the social realm to this feminist dystopian hypergamous hell in the long-term, monagamous relations, either in marriage or in dating, should always largely remain the norm.

After all, k-selection was/is the socio-biological foundations of our race; it was what built Greco-Roman & Celto-Teutonic Western Civilization. It is what has essentially defined us as a People.

~

The American Spectator : Polygamy and Me

… Monogamy creates a society that has an inherent equality. Every male has the promise of getting a female and every female has the promise of getting a male. It gives everyone a stake in society.

…

Both high-status men and low-status women are liberated by polygamy. As the old saying has it, men “date down and marry up.” With polygamy you can do both. Meanwhile, the losers are: 1) high-status women, who must share their mate with lower-status females, and 2) low-status men, who don’t get to mate at all.

It’s that last one that causes trouble. Every society and species that practices polygamy is plagued with a “bachelor herd” of unmated males who are very unhappy with their lot. Competition among males becomes much more violent because the stakes are so high.

You either score with a couple of females or you don’t mate at all. Male fruit flies artificially bred to be monogamous have proved to be much less aggressive with other males. Take away that monogamous contract and your peaceful society disappears with it.

When 18th- and 19th-century Europeans realized polygamy was common in the “backward” portions of the world, they had an easy explanation. Polygamy was a more primitive form of marriage. Advanced societies had evolved out of it. Then they discovered the hunter-gatherers and a different explanation offered itself.

Polygamous societies had remained backward precisely because they were polygamous. Polygamy creates a huge inequality where all the wealth — however little there may be of it — and all the women are concentrated among the more successful men.

Exclude enough men and you have the makings of a jihad society. When there aren’t enough women to go around, it’s easy to convince low-status men there are 70 virgins waiting for them in heaven.

Monogamy is not a natural configuration. It’s a human construct. I also happen to think it’s the greatest social achievement in the history of mankind. Advanced societies never would have evolved without it. …

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/03/23/polygamy-and-me

Remember gentleman, a man will chase a woman until she catches him.

It might sound a little over the top, but the program is amazing for those who’ll pick up the tool and use it. If you’re skeptical at least read a few reviews of the book. It’s still in print.

Profound observations. Very well put!

Sometimes I feel: To hell with it, let’s form a Männerbunde and found a State in some suitable place and just conquer a suitable number of women, preferable white but not strictly necessary, and found a new race much in the same spirit as in the Arthur Saga or the Teutonic Knights.

Yeah. And a lot of us prefer gentlemen and can smell game spitters coming a mile away — and we would never, ever give you the time of day.

In fact, we have a word for men who behave in the manners you describe above: *ssholes.

Wise up HBD boys — you are making a BIG mistake following the advice of gamers. Yes, there are obviously huge differences between men and women — and yes, men should take the lead — but, sheesh, don’t turn into a bunch of *ssholes, please! You’re just gonna turn off the women you should be mating with — the women you could have a happy life with — you know, the ones with a “high level of self-respect and intelligence.”

White Preservasionis is right — talk about dysgenic! Why don’t you just do your sons and grandsons a favor and NOT mate with all the flakey, shallow, stupid women out there — get their genes OUT of the gene pool. Make life better for your progeny already!

The women today cannot help responding to the new “Game” as so much of what it should be and what they should be looking for is spoon fed to them by the biased white male hating media.

Its a problem that younger white males will have to invent a solution to, the game from years ago which had different moves for different races still works on the older women but younger white women these days seem to only respond to the thuggish multi-cultural game. This MC game just doesn’t work for most of the younger white men and until whites get more sense of unity they cannot develop a new white game of their own.

(… which nobody does or ever did in all recorded human history. See Evola in Metaphysics of Sex on that issue.)

This is a well put together article on female seduction.

I’m no expert, but that’s not a neg, it’s a joke. In a neg you subtly insult the girl in order to bring her down a bit.

Not necessarily — an important fact to remember is that quality always trumps quantity.

What we need to do is keep the 5+ billion strong non-White hordes out of our nations by cutting off all non-White immigration, and also figure out humane ways to send off the ones who have already settled in our nations en masse.

Wow, that is pathetic – can that guy spell D-Y-S-G-E-N-I-C?

The owner of the Spearhead has taken issue with your usage of “well-kempt.”

http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=kempt

Major Issue:
‘The only problem I see from a racial point of view is that playboys tend to be childless. ‘

There is a second problem. If by seducing many partners, one gains sexually transmitted diseases, the health of one’s children may be impaired.