One of the major disadvantages American white nationalists face is that American nationality can plausibly be separated from white racial identity. This is a huge difference compared to the European situation.
As Paul Gottfried notes, European countries are now defining their identity in terms of abstract human rights and some kind of egalitarian universal history. Nonetheless, whatever the propaganda, few people really believe it in their bones. When people say “English,” they mean white. Someone like “Sir” Trevor Phillips, even if he became Prime Minister or somehow heir to the throne itself, will never be a true son of Britain, and at some level, everyone knows this, including him. European nationalists therefore have a great advantage. A party such as the Vlaams Belang can appeal to a “Flemish” identity and everyone automatically knows what they are talking about, namely, who is Flemish, and who is not. In the politically correct modern West, it is also an advantage that Europeans can fall back on national identities that are solely white but not defined by race. A pro-Flemish group can not be portrayed as racist the same way that a “pro-white” group can.
In contrast, American identity, as painstakingly outlined by Tomislav Sunic in Homo Americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age, is now almost exclusively defined by an ahistorical narrative culminating in a mythical equality. Ignoring that equality and liberty are mortal enemies, and that the Founding Fathers were by any modern standard white nationalists, America has been successfully redefined into a sort of club where the price of admission is a belief in a vague concept of human rights and a shared appreciation of contradictory figures like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Muhammad Ali.
Now this is absurd of course, but people really do believe it. In some sense, it is plausible because an ethnic identity for Americans, what people like President Teddy Roosevelt called the “American race,” has been abandoned. The late scholar Samuel Huntington, in his greatest work, attempted to the square the circle and marry the universalistic American creed with the American culture that grew out of the Anglo-Protestant ethnic core. However, even he admitted that American identity, though dependent on a core ethnicity, was not defined by it. Once that connection was broken, the only fallback was an American identity defined by white racial identity.
After the Civil War and Reconstruction, this essentially existed. Left wing scholars in “white studies” are ironically close to the truth when they show how a conception of white identity that encompassed non Germanic whites was indispensable in creating the “normal” American identity. They err of course, in believing that this is some kind of capitalist oppressor plot as opposed to an alliance based on biological and cultural reality. However, Negroes were still in some sense considered Americans, even if only second class ones. Eventually, after the so called civil rights movement, this core American identity was opened up to non whites. This naturally transitioned to the abstract American identity we have today and now even saying that there even is something called an American culture is suspiciously racist.
As always, leftists are actually closer to the truth than conservatives here. Leftists admit that America was founded as a white country. White American conservatives, even when they prop up embarassing minstrel acts like Lloyd Martin are essentially conceding that “white” cultural norms are synonmous with American cultural norms. However, until they are able to make the implicit whiteness explict, this is more reactionary posturing, waiting for Mexicans to care about the Constitution written by white slave owners or urban Negroes to thrill to the sounds of Yankee Doodle.
The Tea Parties are overtly anti-racist, and implicitly non-racist. Nonetheless, they are overwhelmingly white. Just the idea of whites gathering in white numbers has leftists scared out of their mind, in the same way that they hate and fear harmless crowds like NASCAR fans, gun lovers, or Sarah Palin supporters. And now, someone has noticed the implications. That someone is Pat Buchanan.
It is amazing to think how establishment Pat Buchanan really is, when all is said and done. He was communications director for Ronald Reagan. He has lived in Washington DC practically his entire life. He knows everyone, and is essentially friends with everyone, even the liberals. If conservatives hadn’t decided to sabotage themselves in 1992 and again in 1996, he could have been President, which would have saved America from mass immigration, 9/11, fiscal collapse, and eventual dissolution. The rise and fall of Pat Buchanan will go down in history as the last chance the United States of America had to save itself.
Now, however, even Pat knows the writing is on the wall. In a bracing new column, “New Tribe Rising?,” Pat notes that America is breaking apart along the lines of ethnonationalism. He knows that whites, and only whites, keep this farce of modern America limping along. He also sees signs that whites are beginning to react against their constant demonization and degradation by our governing elite. He writes,
Adversity and abuse increase the awareness of separate identity and accelerate the secession of peoples from each other… Palin and Tea Partiers now repeat Obama’s disparaging line about their clinging to Bibles and guns — with defiant pride. As others have done in our multicultural and multiethnic nation, this people is beginning to assert its identity, unapologetically.
Pat also notes that other peoples have already defined themselves. “Black America seems united. White America is the house divided, for it is in the womb of white America that this new people is gestating and fighting to be born.”
There’s the rub. The hard part is that white Americans, real Americans, still identify with the cultural symbols, governmental institutions, and historical narratives of the United States, even though the United States of America is objectively the most anti-white force on the planet. One can imagine a Southern secession movement or a Northwest Homeland crushed by Red, White, and Blue waving conservatives who think they are fighting for God and Country when they are really fighting for Goldman Sachs and Lady Gaga.
Any American white nationalist movement will have to accomplish the neat trick of somehow claiming the true American identity (which is historically correct) while denouncing and destroying just about everything the United States of America has come to symbolize today as well as the puerile Enlightenment silliness that led us inevitably to this point. It will not be easy.
However, step one is simple to define, if not to achieve. White Americans need to realize that however much they resist it, try to squirm out of it, or try to beg Michael Steele to free them from it, they are a people. As Samuel Francis stated,
At a time when anti-white racial and ethnic groups define themselves in explicitly racial terms, only our own unity and identity as a race will be able to meet their challenge. If and when that challenge should triumph and those enemies come to kill us as Robert Mugabe has threatened to do to whites in Zimbabwe, they will do so not because we are ‘Americans’ or ‘Christians’ or ‘conservatives’ or ‘liberals,’ but because we are white.
A number of far left blogs are crying “Oh noes! Racisms!” as could be expected. Someone dared to mention white Americans exist and that they may have interests. Of course, no one is actually opposed to ethnonationalism, not even the “I don’t see race conservatives” who are busy giving money to a party headed by a man cosponsoring conferences with his co-ethnic Al Sharpton. It is whites, and only whites, who must sit down, shut up, and fund the people who hate them.
Whites are at least beginning to see the double standards. We shouldn’t be over optimistic or do another “finally, people are waking up” type post. They aren’t — not yet. However, the gestation for a new people is at least taking place.
Saul Alinsky noted that you can not speak to people in terms that are outside their own experience. White nationalists need to step up and start speaking to our people in terms that they understand. Occidental Dissent’s posts on Hitler and esoteric National Socialism and various movement dramas are all very well. However, we need to start thinking realistically, practically, and politically about how to reach our noble, naive, and so easily abused white American folk. While thought exercises like the ones today are fun, tomorrow is a new day and that needs to be our primary focus.
Occidental Dissent, April 21, 2010
4 Comments
For anybody who thinks the Tea Party movement holds any hope for white nationalism, just read the following article written by Tea Party idiot and former SNL comedian Victoria Jackson. She actually gloats about how her daughter is flirting with a black guy. These people are HOPELESS.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/vjackson/2010/04/25/i-met-sarah-palin/
“One can imagine a Southern secession movement or a Northwest Homeland crushed by Red, White, and Blue waving conservatives who think they are fighting for God and Country when they are really fighting for Goldman Sachs and Lady Gaga.”
It is also easy to see 90% of so-called “White nationalists” siding with those flag-waving morons in crushing a secessionist movement out of fear of economic loss, or jealousy and spite if nothing else; that is, until one realizes that economic, political, and social independence are local phenomena having nation- and global-wide ramifications through collaboration and cooperation. In other words, The Northwest Homeland project could not succeed without the socioeconomic collaboration and cooperation of several tens or hundreds of thousands of other informal, miniature, quasi-independent communities across North America’s rural landscape and suburban fringe. If that were to occur, well, the scenario changes altogether.
We must “Think *ORION, Act Locally.”
*Our Race Is Our Nation
Furthermore, rather than waste time promoting attitudes and programs designed to appeal to everyone, we must realize that there are – in the words of Cool Hand Luke – “Some men you just can’t reach.” White nationalists included.
“Occidental Dissent’s posts on Hitler and esoteric National Socialism and various movement dramas are all very well. However, we need to start thinking realistically, practically, and politically about how to reach our noble, naive, and so easily abused white American folk.”
Thinking realistically and practically about the problem leads us to the realization that the political is local, social and economic. No WN political candidate for office at any level, anywhere, stands a chance of enjoying long-term success with locally accessible socioeconomic alternatives in place.
We cannot “fight the system” upon which we are dependent.
Very well said as we learn how to deconstruct the taboos placed on us by the “evil doers” who gleefully anticipate our genocide.
@ “One of the major disadvantages American white nationalists face is that American nationality can plausibly be separated from white racial identity. This is a huge difference compared to the European situation.”
Not so huge… In my blog I used Paul Johnson’s A History of the American People to talk about a numinous revelation (“women like Éowyn, the blond we all saw in the film with Edoras the capital of Rohan in the background…”) that the white nationalists still have to discover. However, in this post I would like to mention what I found most interesting of Johnson’s study.
Franklin for one was such a Cassandra that he manifested serious concerns that the English character of the new America could dilute in the future because of non-Caucasian immigration. This explains his opposition to bringing black slaves into American soil. Franklin even asked the rhetorical question of why, having so fair an opportunity, not excluding all blacks and tawnys to increase the lovely white? “I could wish their Numbers were increased,” wrote the founding father. Obviously, neither Indians nor blacks had the right to vote in Franklin’s day.
Even after the war that tore America apart Lincoln would say that he and his people didn’t approve that blacks continued to live in America. If for secession deep motivation is paramount, it is worth noting that in the chapter about 1815-1850 Johnson claims that only because the peoples who moved to Utah were religiously motivated could the construction of the new nation in the West became possible. Ironically, it was precisely during those years when the Christian morality rebelled against slavery, just as the First Great Awakening had meant the death sentence for British colonialism. (Since the jews were involved in neither, this little piece of info gives plausibility to my view that something else, a “monster from the Id,” escapes MacDonald’s otherwise magnificent and explanatory model.)
On a lesser note, a passage I liked of A History of the American People is a Kendall communication to Andrew Jackson telling him that someday Anglo-Saxons will be majority in Mexico, and that this would improve that country (long before reading it I dared to say something similar—in Mexico!). Another gracious vignette are General Scott’s words after the marines raised the American flag in 1847 for the first time “from the Halls of Montezuma.” This is of course the diametrically opposite of what is happening today in California.
Johnson’s book is far from perfect. But if reversal is possible whites should take heed of history and how the original Americans were tacitly, and sometimes overtly nationalists in an ethnic sense.