It is not a leap of faith to contemplate a Jewish dominated media creating its own opposition. Communism, the highwater mark of Jewish political philosophy, practiced it and the same people are using it now. So they create patriotic issues such as unconditionally supporting a foreign and subversive power like Israel while enacting socialist, anti-Cultural policies stateside.

It is my belief that one can not be a Jew and a WN. Period.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Srh-79OEMKQ

“STOP YOUR LIES. OBAMA IS TOO GREEN NOT TOO BLACK. DROP MY NAME FROM YOUR EMAIL LIST OR I WILL TURN YOUR ORGANIZATION’S NAME OVER TO THE FBI FOR HARASSMENT.”

Classy guy.

Yet when you look at his foreign policy it’s typical neocon stuff about bombing Muslims in Iran and nuking Mecca. I even remember an audio clip on youtube where he outlined what he would change from the current set up, one of the things that sticks in my mind is that he would cut off all foreign aid including to Israel but only after a few years though for Israel not right away.

How does that make Israel & his “chosen people” any different than the welfare parasites he is always ranting about?

Often if not mostly the policy or idea in question will be bad for gentiles. In our generation their policies have been damn near fatal to us.

Then you will find maybe 10% of Jews that are consistent liberals, (maybe Barbara Steisand) and another 10% that are consistently conservative (Bob Novak, rip).

Then there are the half Jews like Ms. Miller at the NYTimes who went to jail for supporting her father’s Jewish nation.

Even “righteous Jews” like Ovstrovsky, Finkelstein, Benjamin Ginsburg, Prelutsky and others, if left to maintain a Jewish nation in America, will have some Zionist grand kids.
You can not allow a Jewish nation to exist inside the American population, at least without realizing the need to keep the Jewish nation under some kind of control.

Breitbart can be understood well by reading at least the second half of that article. My conclusion is that by my definition of “conservative,” he’s not one. For starters, he specifically states that he supports multiculturalism.

Breitbart’s childhood friend and partner is Larry Solov. Here they are in Israel:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2007/07/018081.php

mob

When the slightest consideration is given to the question of whether this or that Jew is “on our side” – when honored contributors elsewhere on TOQO label and lament contributors or contributions as “anti-semitic” – then I suspect one of us is in the wrong place.

But indeed this is perhaps a very old game and I reminded just how old this might be by one of the other posts and the mention of Martin Luther and his disdain for the Jews. It would seem that Luther and all of Christendom had been duped by the template for the Michael Savage’s of the world personafide in Saul (Paul) of Tarsus.

As for Ginsberg, what bearing does his Jewish ancestry have on his writing or ideas? Maybe it does in some sense, but in little that is explicitly Jewish; that is, can one tell he is Jewish just from reading his poetry? In his frank homosexuality, he is more Roman than Hebrew; and in religion he is Oriental, or Buddhist, to be specific. But then, white beat writers, like Kerouac, Burroughs, and Gary Snyder shared similar themes and outlooks. In any case, I don’t see how Ginsberg is responsible for the low white fertility (as Savage implies) or the ongoing genocide by immigration. If anything, his irresponsible, libertine, hedonistic views should lead to more reproduction. The problem with whites is our provident behavior. For whites, an average house cost of $500,000 is a powerful contraceptive. Blacks and Hispanics have less inhibitions.

The left forgets that virtue matters. You forget the role that habituation and education play in the formation of virtue, both personal and civic.

Intellectual argument is fine but it doesn’t mean anything if there is no one left to hear it.