By Christopher Donovan | 5 Comments | 
Print
Attention, NRA Members: It Isn’t Just “Liberals” Out For Your Guns
I receive “American Hunter”, a monthly publication of the NRA (along with “American Rifleman”, which is much of the same editorial material). Its political writer is one Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s lobbying arm. Cox does a pretty thorough job of reporting the details of anti-gun efforts in the United States, and his most recent target is Michael Bloomberg, mayor of New York City. I can’t seem to find a web version (send me an e-mail if you find a link), but the special report in the April 2010 issue is headlined “Bloomberg to Obama: Take ‘Federal Action’ on Guns”. He emphasizes that Bloomberg is putting his own enormous wealth behind the agenda for firearm restrictions. Nowhere, of course, does Cox mention that Bloomberg (or Frank Lautenberg, or Frank Luntz, or any of his allies) is Jewish. (Amusingly, the illustration in “American Rifleman” shows a puppetmaster Bloomberg pulling the strings on various federal officials — the puppetmaster is a recurring illustrative theme of Jewish power.) But the ethnic motivations here are too overwhelming not to mention. Bloomberg, like many Jews, views guns as the nasty tools wielded by potentially anti-Semitic whites, who must be divested of this irrational vestige of white power. That’s what makes him a “man possessed”, as Cox puts it. Meanwhile, I attribute much of the force behind the gun rights movement to implicit whiteness. Conservative, male and/or rural whites have had pretty much everything else stripped away from them, and hanging on to guns is a way for them to channel frustration and “make a last stand.” So far, it’s worked. A white man can be as full-throated as he wants on the gun issue, and nobody can call him a “racist.” I don’t really see any other explanation. The truth is that guns are inanimate objects, and I don’t see much danger of hunting rifles being banned. In an all-white society, some sort of restriction on firearms probably wouldn’t be seen as controversial. There would not, for instance, be the need for a handgun in case a black home invader broke in. It’s the race issue that motivates the gun issue. The racial and ethnic conflicts that we aren’t allowed to hash out directly are instead channeled into a proxy war: rich and powerful Jews on the one side, conservative whites on the other. We need more whites to understand this.
The Occidental Observer Blog, March 23, 2010
Christopher Donovan
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist whose writing has appeared in the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is the media critic for The Occidental Observer (www.theoccidentalobserver.net).
There are several dimensions to the gun issue.
1. Since blacks are physically stronger than whites, whites rely on the gun for protection. If a black guy broke into an average white house, the Willie Horton thing would occur, with the black guy beating up the white guy who would be unable to defend his wife and life.
Thus white male pride rests on the need for guns for defense.
2. Many on the White Right support unlimited gun ownership because it means more power among responsible whites while more mayhem and death among irresponsible blacks. Blacks in inner cities kill one another in huge numbers.
3. Jews support gun rights in Israel where they constitute the solid majority. But gun rights are no good for Jews in America where they are just a small minority. Even if every Jew owned a gun, they would make up only 2% of the population. 98% of gun owners would be non-Jews. Thus, it is in the interest of Jews to take guns away from most people–who are non-Jewish–and gain control over everyone by manipulating the law, the courts, the government(which has control over armed and law-and-order forces). Since Jews are smart and control the PEN, and since civilian authority controls armed authority of government, Jews get to control all of society–both the pen and the sword.
4. As PC grows more powerful and pervasive, it will have be enforced in many communities that rebel against federal authority. If people own fewer guns in those communities, it is easier for the Jewish elite to get things their way.
5. For there to be any real hope for rebellion, the great majority of cops and military men must become Oath Keepers who owe their allegiance to the Constitution and Western Heritage than to government authority and MSM controlled by liberal Jews and their appointed/anointed blacks like Obama, Van Jones, and Mark Lloyd.
6. Conservative whites may own a lot of guns but don’t control the pen because they tend to be anti-intellectual and thick-skulled. Thus, they will never control the media and academia, and most white people will come under the influence of the pen and camera controlled by more intellectual and creative liberals, many of them Jews.
I think the gun control issue is driven by unacknowledged racial motivations on both sides. Whites who are pro-gun see guns as necessary to defend against black criminals. Whites who support gun control falsely believe that gun control means less guns in the hands of black criminals, and, thus, they think this will make them safer.
Racial motivations also drive the non-white promoters of gun control. They know that black and Hispanic gangbangers will continue to own guns even if they are outlawed and that gun control is just a way of disarming whites. It is no coincidence that one of the biggest supporters of gun control in the House is Bobby Rush, the former and unrepetant Black Panther.
I agree that the gun rights movement is implicitly white and gives whites a way to safely funnel their racial/political views without fear of being called “racist.” We could learn a lot from the pro-gun lobby. Just a little over a decade ago, the majority of Americans supported gun control; today it is an extreme minority position. More Americans support the right to bear arms now than did even 40 or 50 years ago. I would be interested in seeing some sort of study as to why the gun lobby has been so successful despite a hostile media and despite the gun control lobby having the emotional appeal of “let’s do this for the children” on their side.
“Jews support gun rights in Israel where they constitute the solid majority. But gun rights are no good for Jews in America where they are just a small minority.”
Hence, never trust a Jew. Blunt but true.
So true bill, so true. Since Jews are historically behind gun control here (Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, etc.) they had to start such diversionary organizations as “Jews for the Preservation of Firearms ownership” (JPFO) rather than just say, contributing to the NRA as Jews…
I used to be a member of the JPFO back when I ran for congress as a libertarian in 1996. Later, when I began to realize that it was Jews behind all these attacks on our rights (power), I thought about what chutzpah it takes to make an organization like that. The JPFO is the organizational equivalent of a diversionary tactic in warfare. It definitely delayed my waking up to the Jewish issue in general and the Jewish machinations behind gun control. It is like they KNOW what is behind the desire for freedom and gun rights and seek to delay our waking up — again, all they need to do is delay, divert, and camoflage while they pass the laws and then of course it is too late. Same general pattern with immigration, diversity-mongering, and race-mixing. Delay and divert until it is too late. It is the invisible Jewish war run from undercover by natural spies and saboteurs based on race. By way of deception thou shalt wage war. Our people are asleep at the wheel.
At last! Someone who unedsrtndas! Thanks for posting!