May 23, 2011

By | 24 Comments | Print Print

Cat Lady Logic

Cat Lady Logic

Obama's speech in El Paso a few weeks ago began with a feel-good story about a graduation ceremony in Miami in which over 180 flags were marched across the stage – one for every nation that at least one student in the graduating class had invaded from. As each flag crossed the podium, that nation's invaders cheered. “But then, the last flag, the American flag, came into view, and everyone in the room erupted in applause. Everybody cheered.”

This is, in a sentimental chestnut, the vision for America's future which has replaced the traditional vision upheld by our forefathers. It's an inversion of it, one in which America is not only something other than a great nation – it's the anti-nation. The flag no longer symbolizes the founding values, values by and for a specific nation of people from throughout Europe who were integrating into a shared Anglo-American identity. The flag symbolizes the singular vision of the tens of millions of foreigners of varying legal statuses stampeding in: a free lunch at our expense.

Obama assures us that they've embraced our ideals and precepts. While most who parrot the recent idea that America is a “notional nation” shy away from explicitly defining the national notion, he came right out and admitted it: “opportunity”. “Pursuit of opportunity” is a euphemistic way of saying “pursuit of self-interest”. They're here to get stuff, not to embody Enlightenment ideals, practice the Protestant work ethic, and watch the big game alongside the buffoons they're replacing. They're doing what's in their interests by coming here, just as our hostile elites are doing what's in their interests by inviting them here.

What's curious is why so many ordinary White Americans are inviting them here. By what logic would we knowingly and willingly give up our inheritance, our infrastructure, our power, and our very future to an ever-growing horde of intruders who no longer even pretend to take assimilation seriously? America's media and academia encourage and promote this madness, but there's a method to the madness beyond the influence of our enemies. It's a mindset ripe for this sort of manipulation.

It's the mindset of a cat lady.

America has become the world's cat lady, throwing its door wide open to whoever wants in. Cat ladies are motivated by an unthinking sentimentality that does the cats more harm than good in the long run. The cats don't care if it's sustainable or even tolerable for the lady, they just want in from the cold and in on the free lunch. The promoters of amnesty and open borders can't define a point at which America's charity would stop – because there isn't one. Expecting the illegal immigrant to consider the welfare of his host country is as absurd as expecting a cat to consider the welfare of the old woman.

Ultimately the act which feels like charity becomes intolerable for all involved, including the parasites. Before you know it, they've taken the place over, refuse to be domesticated, and even threaten and attack their hosts. Obama openly mocked the growing number of Americans who are concerned about border security with jokes about “moats with alligators”, he spoke to the largely Hispanic crowd as a cat among the cats which have taken over the house, offering  up citizenship to the untold tens of millions here and the untold tens of millions on their way here.

We're right, both logically and morally. We can't, however, walk into the trap our enemies have set for us of being the heartless villains intent on being cruel toward immigrants. It's both impossible and wrong to strip our fellow White Americans of the spirit of charity and sacrifice. White folks, especially the well-fed ones in their suburban subdivisions, can't think the way the rest of the world thinks: in simple and stark selfish interests. Even if one could beat the Christianity out of us, the Christian themes and attitudes carry on in the mind long after God dies. It's probably innate, as our pagan forefathers were already abstract, idealistic, and altruistic long before those impulses found expression i

for women”>relationship advice for womenn Christ's message. The problem isn't with charity, per se, but with the unthinking and unsustainable charity typified by the neighborhood cat lady.

If foreigners have a natural disaster, we'll chip in. If their people are starving and we aren't, we'll do our share to help alleviate their suffering. But the solution these non-Whites want is to move over here, and that's no solution at all. They aren't escaping the problems in their home country. They're bringing them here. The Mexican drug cartels are also spilling across our border, and you are guaranteed that they'll bring their turf wars, their street gangs, their grisly murders, and their kidnappings for ransom with them. The legal ones will bring along the illegal ones, and the law-abiding ones will harbor the fugitives.

They obviously don't respect our laws, or they wouldn't be over there defying them and mocking us for trying to enforce them. They obviously don't plan to integrate, or there wouldn't be entire regions in America where the signs, businesses, and conversations are all in Spanish. If they're sincerely loyal to this country, then why do they send tens of billions of dollars “back home” every year? Why do they wave Mexican flags, have Mexican flag bumper stickers, and show up in force at rallies to promote the interests of a foreign country in broad daylight?

Obama won't seriously answer our objections to open borders. Sure, he'll call us some names and try to guilt trip us with sob stories. But he won't answer our objections. He won't answer our objections because he can't.

Our hostile elites will not allow an open debate on open borders because it's an open and shut case of them working against the interests of ordinary White Americans. They're hoping you'll see their little signs depicting pathetic children begging not to be deported and take pity on them. They're hoping you'll be like the cat lady, and just keep letting a few more of them in until our entire home, our entire homeland, is completely overrun. That’s not hyperbole, that’s an official Census Bureau projection.

Mexico's Southern border is guarded by armed soldiers who shoot to kill. This is how fiercely Obama's adoring fans in El Paso protect their own border. Now, I'm not suggesting we stoop to their level. We should be guided by Christian charity in our actions. And when I say charity, I mean true charity, not the unexamined and self-destructive charity of the cat lady. I mean deporting them humanely, each and every last one of them. To do less would be to treat our own children and our children's children inhumanely, because a nation that fails to define and defend its borders (especially a nation as bountiful and beautiful as this great nation of ours) is bound to fall.

We must not become refugees in a crowded third world madhouse dominated by the very people we once gave refuge. I'm proud to say that our advocacy group here in Indiana, Hoosier Nation, helped pass some of the toughest illegal immigration legislation in America. We can’t afford to wait for the federal government to do its job. We have to engage the political process and set an example for our White American peers of a morally confident and tactically competent resistance to the anti-White biases and anti-White policies that are designed to make us unwelcome and uncomfortable strangers in the land our forefathers fought for.

Our victory certainly wasn't enough, and “politics as usual” aren't enough to get us out from under this boot. All Indiana, Arizona, and the handful of other states passing these laws have done is decrease the force and frequency of the boot stomping us into oblivion. What we really need is a radical restoration propelled by a moral and spiritual vision capable of inspiring a true crusade. What we need is to redirect that boundless spirit of sacrifice of so many White Americans from feeding and supporting these ungrateful and undeserving intruders toward a cause and a nation worth sacrificing for.

zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq

Share

Related Posts

  1. avatar
    Greying Wanderer said:

    Quite

  2. Knocked it out of the park!

  3. avatar
    Alexander said:

    Nice one Matt. Having volunteered at a local cat shelter for the last twenty years I know a little about cat ladies and it always ends badly. Either the local environment or the cat lady herself collapses and the cats are always whisked off to who knows where. Sad really. I have six cats myself – down from double that number and I have a mental picture of myself with perhaps two cats at most. It is so easy to allow yourself to be the saviour (interesting choice of words that) of a homeless or destitute cat. Sometimes they just turn up and other times you are asked to look after one for a day or two while the owner relocates and the rest is history. The third position, of course, is to get the numbers under control before we all sink.

  4. Our “Immigration Cat Lady” is not motivated only by mindless charity. Another motivation is fear of the Rats who plan to control the horde of immigrant cats. (Metaphors are never perfect, I know, but the RAT badge must be appended in our immigration narrative.)

  5. Very good analysis of the current immigration situation in the States.

    However, I believe that regardless of the legislation that is passed, the situation has gone too far and it’s time to cut our losses. Whites, who are proud to be
    White need to work for a homeland of our own in the Pacific Northwest.

    I’m not trying to start a ‘flame war’ and yes, I know that there are other articles on this site where this post could have gone but let’s face facts – we have lost and no amount of legislation is going to change the fact that we have millions of illegals on our land that we can’t do anything about. How can anyone expect the idiots in Congress to pass legislation barring future immigration, when they don’t enforce the laws already on the books? The PC commisars and their big money interests have deluded the White American population into believing their lies and the sheeple keep bleating along to the tune of ‘We are all Americans.’ The current educational and social climate in the States is anthetical to any kind of rational debate on immigration and any mention of such gets one labelled as ‘racist’, whatever that means.

    The battle over immigration started to be lost by our fathers back in the 1960s when they allowed the leftie liberals to control the social climate at universities and did nothing to support the right of Whites to say ‘NO’ to integration and various other forms of social engineering, of which PC and the massive waves of immigration are current aspects of.

    It’s time to face facts, my friends – we have lost our country and it’s time to escape the sinking ship and swim to a land where we can build a new future for our children and our grandchildren. [Sorry for the hyperbolic metaphors but I deem them quite appropriate to the current debate].

  6. Being a first generation Canadian, I’ve seen similar things happen over here. A bunch of immigrants move over here, and pretty much become the biggest population within whatever area they decide to inhabit. They have no desire to integrate with the rest of Canada, or even really learn English unless it’s absolutely essential to them.

    All they’ve really done is create a country within a country.

    I don’t see any reason why immigrants should continue to be allowed in when a country is struggling with unemployment rates and has it’s own issues. Instead of then being forced to perhaps up the wages of already existing jobs, the value of labor never goes up cause they always can get immigrants who’ll be happy to do it for minimum.

    Of course I get looked at as a traitor for saying this to any immigrant, or most children of immigrants, but I only bring it up when they start bad-mouthing other races anyway.

  7. Mexico’s Southern border is guarded by armed soldiers who shoot to kill. This is how fiercely Obama’s adoring fans in El Paso protect their own border. Now, I’m not suggesting we stoop to their level.

    On the contrary – we should stoop to that level. We won’t, at least under the present ruling powers. I hold no illusions in that regard. However, taking decisive action to stop illegal aliens with the use of firearms is no different than conducting a police operation – for that is the nature of the brown invasion – a criminal act that violates our laws. That established, we have the right to stop such crimes, up to and including the use of deadly force.

    Ward Kendall
    author of “Hold Back This Day”
    amazon.com

    • Proposing that we shoot to kill impoverished women and children is a poor way to construct a moral argument – which is what our people need. We as a people don’t need to be stripped of our abstract idealism in favor of the cold hard Redbeardian worldview. We need to be persuaded to embrace a new abstract ideal, one which inspires, invigorates, and emboldens us. Only a marginal subset of Whites are even capable of thinking in vulgar self-interest, so it would be a fool’s errand even if it were necessary.

      I’m not saying that lethal force in a lawful context ought to be off the table, but the eagerness some folks have for dwelling on the hypothetical potential for it is off-putting to persuadables and tactically misguided. It’s useful in our opponents’ efforts to characterize us as morally bankrupt and potentially dangerous “haters”. Efforts to preserve our sovereignty and the ethnic integrity of our traditional communities ought to be as humane as practically possible, both to rob our opponents of moral arguments against us and because we’re not the bad guys.

      • avatar
        The Awakened White Man said:

        Moral Schmoral. Nobody ever won a war by being moral. That is what this is a war. A war for our very survival as a people. The way you win a war is not to die for your grand high ideals or country, but to make the other poor dumb bastard die for his. Or something to that regard as a great man might have once said. That’s what we are doing, dying for our ideals. I don’t know about you but I’m tired of dying. I want to win and morals be damned. We can think of something to be moral and high minded about after that. Like how proud of ourselves we are that we whipped those commie pinko sumbitches at the battle of Washington D.C and drug their leader out of his hiding place in chains. Now that’d be something to be proud of in my book.

  8. Matt, I think your analogy of America being a cat lady is surprisingly spot on. I think there are still some issues to be flushed out a bit more, but for the most part, you new approach was in its own way pretty liberating.

  9. very apt analogy and well writted article.

    i think that 85% of americans – at least those who are not married to a illegal – agree with you.

    the problem is that our national media is filled with CFR members, and our elected officials are also all CFR globalists with a charade of a left/right – liberal/conservative divide that is little more than sock-puppetry now.

    they both are globalists who need some theme to keep the peasants busy fighting one another. that is the underlying problem.

    the populist dem base and populist repub base are all agreed that adopting unskilled economic migrants is not done in any other country anymore, and its not done in any of the countries the economic migrants come from.

    even using a ‘free-trade’ logic, the labor (including USA citizens) would need the ability to go wherever they choose to seek the best opportunity, but Mexican law specifically outlaws USA economic migrants.. you must have a pension and income to move to mexico..

    its a no-brainer to the avg person, but to the CFR paid hacks and elite, there brain is already bought and sold to chant the party line nonsense.

  10. avatar
    Mark Hess said:

    Mr. Parrott,

    This article is excellent. Thank you for writing it.

    “They’re here to get stuff, not to embody Enlightenment ideals…”

    I very much appreciate your mentioning Enlightenment ideals for two main reasons: 1. We and European countries have learned the hard way that those Enlightenment ideals get exploited and trashed on an alarming scale by non-European immigrants (most brazenly by Muslims in Germany, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands and Denmark). 2. Unfortunately, those Enlightenment ideals often seem to be forgotten and even spat upon by many in this “movement,” as displayed by the off-putting prevalence of misogyny and anti-human/anti-reason strains of religiosity.

    Also, for me, one of the most important parts of your article was the way you clearly showed that embracing nationalism (protecting one’s own, and protecting the borders of one’s country) does not naturally lead to a lack of concern and care for other peoples and other countries, and it does not mean that one magically turns into an ogre who abandons all that is humane and/or psychologically Christian. I believe many of us, especially our friends on “The Left,” for lack of a better term, need to be reminded of that.

    Thanks again.

    Sincerely,
    Mark

  11. I’ll parrot what others have said – that your analogy is a very good one. Even my cat agrees with you!

    At some point, however, whites will have to compromise their charitable disposition and resort to brute force to ensure their very survival. Occupying the moral high ground is important but there comes a time when one has no choice but to fight fire with fire.

  12. avatar
    The Awakened White Man said:

    Call to leaders: We’ve talked about cat ladies, we’ve talked about everything possible really with no action or course of correction.
    What we need is someone to beat the misplaced sense of altruism out of the cat ladies. That is how you handle cat ladies, so that a real and healthy sense of charity is not overshadowed by madness. Cat ladies have their cats taken away and the hoarder generally wind up in a nursing home setting or mental institutions as wards of the state, or even on the wrong side of the law if the offenses are serious enough and the offenders repeat. Nobody ever reasoned a cat lady out of being insane, because it doesn’t work that way. I’m ready to do what is necessary to the cat ladies not for their own good, for the good of the cats, but for the good of Western Civilization as a whole. Send me forth. We eagerly await your call should you arise.

    Signed, The Common Man

  13. avatar
    john thames said:

    I have no problem with saving cats because they are adorable creatures who deserve to live. As for the Mexicans, they should be bayoneted San Jacinto style, while kneeling and begging for their lives. We did it at san Jacinto; weshould do it again.

  14. avatar
    john thames said:

    The renunciation of violence by Mr. Parrott is a little naive. Deporting aliens gives them the incentive to try again. Crucifixes by the thousands along the border send the right message.

    As a historian, I like to refer to the past for guidance. Let us take the Roman wars with Carthage as a pertinent illustration. The Romans fought three bloody wars with Carthage before prevailing. The second war cost the total extermination of their manpower at Cannae. When Roman two legged cows grew back the dead, the Romans prevailed at Zama. The Romans then provoked a third war upon Carthage, knowing that it was only a matter of time before Carthage regained its strength. They did the right thing. The Romans killed the Carthaginian males, broke up the remaing families and sold the women and children into slavery. It was brutally inhumane but spectacularly successful. The Romans did the same thing with Spartacus when they finally prevailed after six humiliating defeats. They butchered 100-200,000 in a single day on the battlefield – and then crucified the pitiful survivors.

    This is the mentality we need- not humane methods that shall deter no one. As the Romans sagely put it: “Let them hate, so long as they fear”.

  15. avatar
    Mr. Issippi said:

    Talk about ‘sleeping with the enemy’….

    The Cat Lady analogy is appropriate in another way in that we’ve become a feminized nation. To be a bit more specific, the once patriarchal, white middle/lower class has morphed into a matriarchy over the span of a mere 2 generations to the extent we are now drowning in estrogen in a country that feminists still falsely claim to be suppressed by testosteron. Simply, white women dominate the direction of our white future, with white men having pathetic little influence, having less say in the equation than do 15 year old girls.

    Nationalistic white males are afraid to dare mention the WF problem–our white female problem–which I believe to be much more damaging to the health of the white race than all our other problems combined, as WFs have become the #1 ally of our anti-white enemies.

    Of course, as I had to explain at Stormfront each time I mentioned the WF problem, I’m not talking about the 2 to 5% of WFs who may be racially aware and pro-white. I’m talking about the other 95+% who are all Cat Ladies to varying degrees, including the 70% of single white female voters who voted for Obama in ’08.

    Just one example: A few years ago, my own mother gave her take on the Latino immigration problem , by stating, ”Well, if white men won’t do the work, let’s bring in Mexicans!”

    Great idea, cat lady! LOL! Just bring in more cats!

    Given low (negative) birth rates, race mixing, white-male hating feminism, female chauvinism, a WF dominated educational system that openly discriminates against white boys, ‘our’ white females are killiing our nations, cultures and race !

    I consider the world-wide majority of white females to be the #1 enemy of the white race !

    • avatar
      Samuel Gray said:

      This is 100% correct. Our women have become our own enemy because we gave them the freedom they asked for, and the result is that they still hate us. We act kind and they still hate us. Women will always hate men, but they hate us more now because they don’t respect us. The very least we can do is have their respect. Then we can be ‘loved’ until children arrive. We must return to the old ways, because women’s equality results in our genocide.

      No amount of capitulation from men will ever make up for the ‘crimes’ of protecting and promoting our people that other men did in the past, because white men hating schools and media will not let women see it as a net positive. Every little action, no matter how natural or logical is inflated and demonized so it is seen as a terrible and murderous crime worthy of damnation both here and in the afterlife.

      Want to keep blacks out of your neighborhood? Who will object? Blacks, women and pussified men (this includes ‘religious’ men so self interested in their own afterlife, they will sacrifice you and everyone else, including their own children, on the bloody altar of diveristy to get to heaven.).

      It is white MEN against everyone, even our women. Very sad indeed.

  16. What’s wrong is our idea of what morality consists of. Self-sacrifice? Well, what more efficient way to sacrifice ourselves as a people than to throw the borders open to invaders and give away all that we have to them? You haven’t effectively made the case that it isn’t “moral”; all you’ve shown is that it isn’t prudent.

    You can’t combine altruism in the Ayn Rand sense (fanatical masochism) with self-protection. The following argument is weak: we protect ourselves prudentially while remaining altruistic self-sacrificers morally. Since morality trumps any prudence in contradiction to it (as far as inspiration is concerned), calls to reason and moderation in this matter will fail. They have failed. How did we get here to begin with?

    I suggest replacing the morality of altruism entirely with the morality of racial self-interest. That may feel repugnant, but it would be 100% more effective than anything else.

    • My goodness, finally, one sane comment here. Yes, WF is the big problem, but why? How about WM feverishly exterminating each other in the two world wars started in 1914 by the three quarrelling cousins, one of them, Wilhelm, knocking the other, Nickolas, out of the war by sponsoring a communist revolt behind the front lines.
      Women took over, and here’s the REAL problem. WM HAVE STOPPED BREEDING. Mexicans are merely the fillers for dying and non-reproducing whites, addicted to the government SS, Medicare and all that, which used to be provided by the couples’ 5-7-10 children.
      And the government is happy to buy their votes with freebies, no need to breed.
      You can’t stop the Mexicans, you can’t stop the business needing the Mexicans, you can’t have the Congress send the army to shoot the Mexicans, all you need to do is SOOO simple – breed and let your kids, not the government, take care of you when you are old.
      Can you do that? BTW, speaking about shooting, did Breivik have any kids? Or did he spend 10 years, like Karl Marx, writing his Manisfesto?
      Well, gents, here’s the sad reality for you. White guys willing to breed can’t have but immigrant non-bitchy women do the child bearing for them. There are tons of freeloaders among the whitest of the white – the unions. Just look at the super-white mob attacking the Wisconsin Capitol when asked to pay for their health insurance. Most of them – of Scandinavian descent bussed in by the white union bosses to attack governor Walker.
      And let me tell you – it’s MUCH MUCH worse in Europe. It’s what the very white Europeans have been dreaming of since the mid-1800s.
      So, either triple the output of your baby –making effort, or be happy about the Mexicans. At least they have the same holidays, unlike the Muslims, who breed like crazy and produce nothing.

  17. avatar
    Carpenter said:

    Well written:

    “All Indiana, Arizona, and the handful of other states passing these laws have done is decrease the force and frequency of the boot stomping us into oblivion. What we really need is a radical restoration propelled by a moral and spiritual vision capable of inspiring a true crusade. What we need is to redirect that boundless spirit of sacrifice of so many White Americans from feeding and supporting these ungrateful and undeserving intruders toward a cause and a nation worth sacrificing for.”

    This will come when White people are poor, which we will be. Third World immigration brings Third World poverty.

    Let’s not think Whites can’t fight. But as always in history, people rise to fight only when they have nothing left to lose.

    When we are poor, unemployed and hungry, we’ll fight. And at that time, it won’t matter if the enemy side is twice or three times bigger (which it won’t be, and it won’t be united either). We’ll easily win when there is no hijacked U.S. superpower attacking the forces of White freedom. Yes, when the U.S. itself is the battleground, the game will be entirely different.

    In the end we win. That’s not the question. The only question is how much suffering there will be on the way. And that is what we must fight to mitigate.

  18. Did you forget that the “founding forefathers” were at one time slaveholders who made decisions under a racist ideology, and that the ideas of freedom and liberty were only applicable to a select race and class? And now, in 2011, we have forgotten the racialized legacy of our country, to the detriment of social and economic well-being of our population, and moreover we preach a the values of a “meritocracy”, which obscures the fact that not all social groups in this society start off at the same level? I implore you to think about the social, economical, and historical context of the trends you analyze. We live in a racialized and gendered society, in which all people are NOT seen as equals. It is time that we stop fantasizing of a legacy of “forefathers,” when the ideals of America were just that, ideals…countries change, people move, people grow, societies adapt. Let’s take a step back and value the diversity of this country and fuel the hope that everyone, if given the equal opportunity, has something to offer.

  19. avatar
    john thames said:

    The white birth rate is too low – but the basic cause is mommy worship in divorce court that allows the female to walk off with automatic custody of the kids and rob the ex-husband blind. Automatic custody for daddy, as in the mid-nineteenth century, would put a stop to that. Jew-Among-You is right that there is a time to fight. He also graciously allowed my exposition on Holocaust Denial to stay posted on his blog, for which I thank him.

  20. Matt is right. Killing illegals is disgusting and talking about crucifixion is sick. Send them back to Mexico humanely. Retain your own human dignity.

Back to Top