Consumerism in Atrophy

Excellent news from the economic/cultural front!

Recession? Teenagers Get It, and Are Cutting Back
By STEPHANIE ROSENBLOOM
Published: December 25, 2009

After a year of observing their parents pinch pennies and fret about the economy, the nation’s teenagers may be coming to grips with reality.
Sales are down sharply in recent months at nearly every major retail chain catering to teenagers, and interviews with teenagers suggest that the reasons go beyond their own difficulty finding part-time jobs.

“I think my sister and I, throughout this year we’ve kind of lost an interest in getting gifts and things like that,” said Morgan Porpora, 16, who in the past had a list of things she wanted for Christmas. “I guess we’ve noticed the economy and we just kind of even feel bad I guess asking for a lot.”

Last month, stores that specialize in clothing and accessories for teenagers were the worst-performing sector in all of retailing, posting a 7.8 percent year-over-year sales decline, according to Thomson Reuters.

Consumerism has caused cultural development to go backwards; it has made mental children of grown men and women. Any setback of consumerism will force deeper, more mature thinking, which will lead to more local cooperation and more of a concept of a collective interest or a public interest.

This is the trend we’ve been waiting for. It’s our wave to surf, because our appeals have always been to practical matters and common sense. Consumerism encourages an atrophy of common sense and practical thinking; the waning of consumerism will see a waxing of common sense and practical thinking.

Multiculturalism and diversity has taken advantage of child-like adults, of cargo cult consumerists. The Multicult won’t go away over night, but the waning of consumerism and the waxing of practical thinking will create better conditions for us, and worse conditions for the Multicult.

A gardener doesn’t think only about the pest insects. It’s actually more important to think about the conditions that help pests thrive. White Nationalism 2.0 must focus more on the conditions, and less on the “pests” themselves. In a healthy garden, there are “pest insects” present, but their damage is only cosmetic. They don’t have a noticeable effect on yields.

I’m betting on society moving in a healthier direction. I recognize it’s a gamble, but any time you make a plan for the future, you are gambling. Things could turn out differently.

Just as many Whites helped Jews undermine society, there will be Jews that will jump on the bandwagon of anti-consumerism/economic relocalization, despite the fact that such a thing will ultimately be bad for the agenda of Organized Jewry.

Only a small percentage of society understands the concept of economic/cultural conditions being favorable to certain ethnic groups. Consumerism good for O.J., decentralized and relocalized, steady state economies which devolve power to localities are good for YT.

Why is devolved, decentralized power better for us and worse for Organized Jewry? Real simple — there’s more of us! A LOT MORE. Six million them, at least 150 million us. 25x more of us.

They depend on centralized control; on pushbutton power; on one phone call from Ehud Barak to George W. Bush causing the latter to interrupt a speech, take the call, and then call Condi Rice and order her to do Ehud’s bidding. It’s like magic, but it’s highly leveraged. I have read both of Victor Ostrovsky’s Mossad exposes, “By Way of Deception” and “The Other Side of Deception.” Israelis in the government, military and Mossad understand quite well how much Jewish power depends on leverage, in a way that American Jews do not. The second book talks about how Israel has wanted to get the US to attack Saddam Hussein and finish him off way back in the 1980’s despite the common view that Saddam was a stable ally of the US and not particularly hostile to Israel. Ostrovsky thought this was a crazy idea and part of his work in trying to undermine the Mossad was to stop them from using the US to fight proxy wars. This was 1986!

Back in 2002, myself and a friend attended a lecture by Daniel Pipes at my alma mater. We handed out a leaflet to the audience with a graphic of Daniel Pipes’ head on a vulture. The vulture’s “right wing” said, “neoconservatism, rapture religion, Wars for Israel” and the “left wing” said, “Communism, race mixing, open borders” and the caption was “Right wing? Left wing? It’s all the Jew-wing of America!” The American Jews at the lecture were extremely hostile and threatening and raging at us. Pipes did say during the lecture, and I quote, “The United States will have to do the heavy lifting, militarily speaking, in the Middle East.” This was 6 months before the invasion of Iraq.

A group of American college students, including a couple of Jewish college students, and one well known, outspoken militant Likudist Israeli college student, sat with us. The American kids took seats in a row in front of myself and my friend and were very hostile and threatening, but the Israeli kid took a seat right next to us, told his friends to shut up, and politely asked us several questions. He seemed extremely concerned with ordinary Americans being angry about Israeli influence on Middle East policy. Several times he had to shush his friends who wanted to demonstrate their righteous hatred of myself and my friend. The Israeli tried to ask a question of Pipes but was ignored, and jokingly blamed it on us, as he was sitting next to us. When I read Ostrovsky’s books, the Israeli’s attitude made sense to me.

Ostrovsky is one of the sensible Israelis, who understands that they have it good and don’t want to upset the apple cart. But his faction was overthrown by the hard core Likudists, who want to keep Israel in a constant state of tension with the Middle Eastern neighbors. Likudists apparently fear peace, because the Israelis will go soft and maybe even start mixing with Arabs. They know that modern Muslim Palestinians were probably the original Jewish Israelites, and don’t want to end up like them.

So however bad you think we have it, and however powerful you think the Jews are, remember that all their power is leveraged. If you don’t believe me, read Ostrovsky’s books. You will learn things that O.J. most certainly does not want you to know.

To recapitulate:

A decentralization of the economy and devolution of power, will be a deleveraging of the power of O.J. Socio-economic conditions will be better for us, and worse for them. The best thing we can do is meet the coming challenges head on, and do our best to thrive and amplify all healthy, life-affirming trends.