Feb 6, 2010

By | 15 Comments | Print Print

F. Roger Devlin Discussed, TOQ mentioned in Weekly Standard Cover Story

F. Roger Devlin is discussed somewhat respectfully in Charlotte Allen’s cover story “The New Dating Game” in the February 15, 2010 issue of The Weekly Standard, a Jewish neo-conservative magazine. TOQ is also mentioned. See here and here. Congratulations Dr. Devlin, and thanks.

Share

Related Posts

  1. There are many interesting personalities in the media who talk about sex – Devlin, Roissy, Tucker Max.

    Roissy (who is heavily judaized in behavior, but allegedly not Jewish genetically) made waves recently because one of his online flame-partners – i.e. a person with whom he had entertaining verbal conflicts – revealed his actual name – James C. Weidmann. The controversy over whether he was a German Catholic or a Jew still lingers. This didn’t get anyone killed, and it made a publicity splash.

    However, do not forget that there are very important actors who rarely get mentioned.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3964208/Man-dressed-as-Santa-kills-nine-at-Christmas-Eve-party.html

    The evolution of sexual ethics will involve new tactics. Some men will emulate Bruce Jeffrey Pardo, and public order may be gravely challenged by these malcontents.

  2. Articles like this make it easier to understand why White guys (presumably the described beta-types) end up with Asian women. A LOT of really smart White guys (PhD level scientists and tech guys, in particular) are ending up with Asian women here on the West Coast. I don’t know too many accountants, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it were the same with them.

    I am really coming to the conclusion that the forces at work in society are too strong for White Nationalists to counter on a large scale. The PLE strategy seems the best route — internal self-separation.

    I’m sorry if women think the world is a better place for them today, but from what I can see, I would prefer the values and social norms of 60+ years ago.

  3. Public order, nay civilization itself, has already been destroyed by feminist malcontents and their Judeo-handlers, so it’s only to be expected that we will see more Pardos picking off the triumphalist survivors partying their asses off amidst the stinking wreckage. It’s going to happen. They reap what they sow, full stop.

  4. They described TOQ as a “paleoconservative” publication. Do the editors have any thoughts on why they did this?

    • avatar
      Greg Johnson said:

      I am not sure, since TOQ was founded precisely to deal with race differences and the Jewish Question, which are topics that Paleocons go out of their way to avoid. Perhaps it is the Samuel Francis connection, since Francis had one foot in the Paleocon camp (writing for Chronicles, for instance). If that is the case, then the author and her editor are just being superficial. I suspect that mentioning TOQ will not go unpunished.

  5. Aye, mentioning TOQ without the label ‘white supremacist’ should generate a few angry responses. Perhaps even from PC Paleos due to the mix-up!

  6. avatar
    Trainspotter said:

    Congratulations to Devlin, Johnson, and TOQ in general. This shows how putting out quality work on a consistent basis can in fact be noticed and treated with reasonable fairness. Of course, that alone doesn’t get us our nation. I think we all understand that. But it’s part of the process, part of spreading our ideas on many different fronts. Again, congratulations are certainly in order. The work here is beginning to percolate, and it’s a wonderful thing to behold.

  7. ‘They reap what they sow, full stop.’

    Of course, every person’s death diminishes my happiness, but some acts of outraged fathers are more grotesquely horrible than others. While Pardo was horrifying, Joshua Tabor recently waterboarded his daughter because she could not (at four years of age) recite the alphabet.

    http://www.sott.net/articles/show/202642-U-S-soldier-waterboarded-his-own-daughter-4-because-she-couldn-t-recite-alphabet-

    I have noted albums of Jewish music produced by musicians with the surname “Tabor,” but I do not know Joshua Tabor’s ethnicity.

  8. In fact, Charlotte Allen did not go unpunished for an earlier piece on the subject of women, either. I didn’t see praise from Devlin among the Comments; he must not have read her self-deprecating remarks; he would have found them most appropriate:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022902992_Comments.html

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022902992_pf.html

    http://www.rightcelebrity.com/?p=3284

    MOB

  9. Always glad to see Devil’s named mentioned anywhere. He is one of the rare authors that understands the true enemy of the white race . . . Namely feminism.

    Roissy knows it but can’t see past the panty dropping stage yet.

    It was a pretty good article all around though would have been better if they had agreed more and printed more of Devlin’s thoughts.

  10. avatar
    Andrew Hamilton said:

    Charlotte Allen wrote, “. . . the Occidental Quarterly, a paleoconservative publication whose other contributors tend to focus obsessively on the question of which ethnic groups belong to which race.”

    Yeah, as in: Jews Don’t Belong to the White Race.

    But not many contributors do so. There’s more philosophy, politics, pop culture analysis, book reviews, and dating advice than biology.

  11. Would like to see more social conservatism.

  12. avatar

    This respectful citation buttresses the point I have made previously, that there is a qualitative difference between Jewish neoconservativism and Jewish liberalism. You would never see an article like this in The New Republic or The Nation.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: Abusive, irrelevant, spammy, or trollish comments are prohibited. Repeat violations of this policy will result in a permanent ban.

Back to Top