By Andrew Hamilton | 15 Comments | 
Print
Iranians and the West Iranians—A Threat to Whites?
The United States and other ex-European nations appear to be preparing a war against Iran.
Some military analysts innocently believe the United States will not attack Iran until it has first subdued the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, because to do so seems irrational. Such observers have not studied the Jewish mind.
But do racialists believe Iranians are a threat to whites? Two interesting objections along these lines were raised in comments to a previous TOQ article about Iran.
An Iranian Invasion?
One expressed the perception that Iranians pose a threat to whites, and by implication are our racial enemies, because of immigration into white homelands.
TOQ editor Greg Johnson’s comment in reply is worth quoting in full:
Iranians, to my knowledge, are not prominent among the Muslims invading the West. A good number of Iranians came to the US after the fall of the Shah, half of them Jews, but I do not think that large numbers of Iranians are currently settling in the West. If we were to attack Iran and set up a puppet regime, then suddenly the West would be flooded with Iranians, just as we are now being flooded with Iraqis. They send Americans to destroy Iraq, then bring in Iraqi refugees to destroy America and other white nations.
The largest Persian Jewish populations in the world are concentrated (in order of size) in Israel, the United States, and Iran. In the US the expatriates are concentrated in Beverly Hills, the exclusive Westside suburbs of Los Angeles, and in Great Neck (Long Island), New York. Kings Point, a village near Great Neck, boasts the largest percentage of Persian Jews per capita in the United States. In Beverly Hills, where Iranian Jewish wealth is ostentatiously displayed (see here [article], here [photo slideshow], and here [brief commentary]), they comprise an estimated 25-50% of the population.
Persian Jews outside Iran are opponents of the Iranian government (they side with the “protesters”) and fervent supporters of Israel. They raise millions of dollars for Israel, which they regard as their spiritual homeland. Though Persian Jews practice rites similar to or identical with traditional Sephardic Judaism, they are not Sephardim (Jews of Iberian—Spanish or Portuguese—descent). Nor are they Ashkenazim. They belong to a third population group—Mizrahi, or Oriental, Jews.
Immigration of non-whites into the US is not automatic. It requires the formal or informal consent—indeed, participation—of government. It requires the existence of a vast, unpublicized financial and logistical infrastructure to import the foreign populations, and discriminatory laws and wealth transfers to maintain and advance them once they are here. Only Jews are capable of doing this for their own people. All other groups are dependent upon Jews and upon Gentiles in the Jewish establishment to establish, maintain, and operate the necessary social mechanisms to make large-scale immigration possible.
It is necessary to distinguish between the symptom (non-whites in white homelands) and the disease (a hostile ruling elite).
Iran and the Bomb
A second objection to the Iran article, raised by TOQ contributor Michael O’Meara, is that “a nuclear-armed Iran will unquestionably pose a threat to our European homeland.”
This thesis is reinforced by a “Pentagon adviser” (Jew or Gentile not specified) who told Jewish reporter Seymour Hersh:
Allowing Iran to have the bomb is not on the table. We cannot have nukes being sent downstream to a terror network. The bottom line is that Iran cannot become a nuclear-weapons state. [I.e., Israel and the US, aggressive nuclear powers, will not permit it under any circumstances.] The problem is that the Iranians realize that only by becoming a nuclear state can they defend themselves against the US. Something bad is going to happen.
Here, differing perceptions of factual reality come into play. There are no hard and fast rules, because we lack trustworthy information. As so often happens, a subjective probability calculus must substitute for reliable facts. Different people will therefore come to different conclusions.
But isn’t it imperative to take gross disparity of power into account? An Iran with one or a few rudimentary bombs is no match for Israel and the Jewish-aligned states (including the US and UK) that would retaliate against it or launch a preemptive strike. A formidable set of allies is arrayed against an aspiring nuclear Iran: the governments and secret police agencies of Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China—indeed, all of the great enemies of the white race.
“The Iranians don’t have friends,” a “former high-level Defense Department official” told Hersh. “If necessary, we’ll keep knocking back their infrastructure [with stealth bombers and standoff missiles]. Put bad stuff in ventilator shafts [of the alleged underground nuclear facilities] and put them to sleep [kill them].”
While it would be desirable to put the nuclear genie back in the bottle, that is not going to happen. Of the two remaining alternatives—a monopoly of nuclear weapons by Jews and states servile to them or a more equitable distribution of power—which is preferable? The Jewish-aligned states pose a deadly threat to the survival of the white race.
Fool Me Twice
Finally, do Iranians really have, or will they soon develop, nuclear weapons? The 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) concluded that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Mossad says Iran will have a bomb by 2014 at the earliest. Others estimate later.
Tehran says its nuclear program is peaceful and Western spies are lying when they say Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons.
Jews claim there are “two parallel nuclear programs in Iran”—the one declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is legal, and a secret operation run by the military and the Revolutionary Guards. But Zionists offer no evidence to substantiate the claim.
Even neoconservative Richard Armitage, an extremist who embodies everything wrong with the United States, hedges: “I think Iran has a secret nuclear-weapons program—I believe it, but I don’t know it.” This despite Israeli, US, and God knows how many other foreign spies and internal turncoats swarming over the Iranians like insects (HUMINT), and ultra-sophisticated electronic and satellite surveillance (SIGINT) eavesdropping on every move they make.
The brazen lies previously deployed by officials to invade and overthrow Iraq undermine the faith of some in the apocalyptic Jewish and American accusations. Indeed, one of the justifications for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was the lie propagated by the US and Britain that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein had revived his clandestine nuclear weapons program.
Perhaps it is time to set a limit on our gullibility, or malleability. Jews and governments have cried “Wolf!” once too often.
Whites, of all people, should be wary of such accusations, having been victimized by the same tactic numerous times. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the ADL, both tightly interwoven with the US security apparatus, blatantly promote the lie that white “racists” pose a dire threat to the government and citizenry of the United States. The government and mass media not only parrot this Big Lie, but behave exactly as if it were true.
Judging from the rhetoric of Jewish groups, the media, and even some government statements and publications, it appears that white freedom of speech and assembly have been classified, de facto, as criminal “hate,” or even “domestic terrorism.” The de jure change needed to reflect this, a mere formality, will eventually follow.
There have been far too many victims of this crass assault upon liberty to enumerate, but Ernst Zündel’s case is representative. Zündel, a German Canadian writer and publisher, was persecuted for decades by the government of Canada and by free-roaming thugs. The authorities permitted domestic terrorists to threaten his life numerous times, including multiple assassination attempts, without punishment.
Finally, three nations—Canada, the United States and Germany—conspired to violate his human rights by jailing him for seven years. Canada kept the poor man caged in solitary confinement for two years under anti-terrorism legislation. The disgraceful Canadian Justice Pierre Blais, according to the Associated Press, “ruled that Zündel’s activities were not only a threat to national security, but ‘the international community of nations‘ as well” (emphasis added).
These people label anyone a “terrorist,” no matter how false the charge, if it suits their purpose. Governments, the media, and academia fall into line. Look at Iraq. Why should anyone believe them about Iran?
On Their Own
They
have lied too much, for too long.
They have hated too intensely and indiscriminately.
They have destroyed everything worthwhile.
Blood drips from their hands. They have murdered, bombed, tortured, beaten, jailed, destroyed, and defamed too many human beings—including tens of millions of whites—with utter impunity.
They are not our demigods.
We should refuse to trust them, or believe in them, anymore.
If Zionists and neoconservatives want to crush Iran, let them do so using their own blood, and their own silver.
Andrew Hamilton
Andrew Hamilton is the pen name of a widely-published author on the science and politics of race.
Well written! The situation is outrageous, to say the least. Are these thugs going to get away with it once more? Are we going to take Grima Wormtongue on his word again? Nay, this time I hope we’ll take inspiration from the The Lord of the Rings and join hands with all who are interested in life, justice, honor, order and beauty and finally terminate the Ring and its deadly influence. After the great battle the various races of the world go back to their respective places to co-exist in peace and seek a path of life suitable for each.
The analogy is quite clear and the solution is there, has been there, for quite some time. 0% Racism, 0% Hate — the ideal is peaceful co-existence and, hence no Ring.
You state in your article that Russia is an enemy of the white race. Is Modern Russia really our enemy? Putin seems to have somewhat followed the same path that earlier took place in Belarus. I suspect Russia was bought off over this Iran situation. But I am not sure that Russia isn’t fighting the Jews on their own turf and could easily become the bulwark against the ex-West.
Mr. Hamilton’s cogent arguments and reasoning are irrelevant. If the United States or Israel launched a war of aggression against Iran, the vast majority of European-Americans would enthusiastically support the war-crime. We are our own worst enemy. A significant segment of white Americans are morons and easily manipulated by the Jewish dominated political and media establishment.
The best foreign policy for the US would be “war on Al-Qaida, peace with everyone else”.
Andrew,
You and I have no power over what happens. The question is largely an academic one for us.
Academically, then, I believe that we have no interest in defending Iran’s nuclear potential — whatever the Jews and their hirelings say.
Reason number one: Russia opposes a nuclear armed Iran. That should be reason enough, for Russia is the one white nation that is concerned about the survival of its people. (It’s also the single white nation to have thrown off its Jewish yoke).
Reason number two: Islam has posed an on-going threat to the West for the last 1400 years. We don’t want our historic enemies to acquire nukes.
Reason number three, the most important: Any Muslin nation with nuclear arms would threaten the possibility of our future liberation. How? Imagine a situation in which a European nation experienced a national revolution and then sought to repatriate the Muslim hordes occupying their lands. (Such a revolution, I might add, is a hundred times more likely to occur in Europe than in the US). In such a situation, Iran or any other nuclear-armed Muslim nation would LIKELY threaten retaliation. Our liberation would then become our annihilation.
White nations may, at present, be subservient to the Jews. But one day, if the gods should ever return, we might regain control of our destiny. At that point, the near monopoly of nukes by whites will be to our definite advantage.
Why, then, create problems for ourselves down the line just in order to frustrate the Jews at this present point? Besides, another US military adventure might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The Jews are eventually going to destroy us — so why not let them ruin the source of their world power by encouraging the stupid Yankees to over-extend themselves by opening another front in Iran?
Hamilton is right again. I’d add only that people should take a look at Mearsheimer’s previous book (the Tragedy of Great Power Politics), which shows how little nukes actually matter in practice. They didn’t help the US in Vietnam, nor have they decided the ongoing serious India-Pakistan conflict. The only thing an Iranian bomb would do is deter the US from invading and changing the regime as it did in Iraq, which is exactly what the Hersh quote suggests. So it’s not really about nukes, it’s about who has a problem with an Islamic regime governing a sovereign Islamic country. Jews do, WNs shouldn’t.
In fact, the last time Iran (Persia) attacked Europe was c. 470 BC, or thereabouts, when they had a disagreement with the Greeks. Since then Iran has been repeatedly attacked and harrowed by external powers. In the 20th century alone, 1941: attacked, occupied, and partitioned by Brits and Russians; 1951: government overthrown by US and Brit intelligence services, puppet Shah put in power; mid-1980s: US and Israel sponsor bloody aggression by Sadaam Hussein Iraq that kills 1,000,000 Iranian soldiers and civilians. All this, and Iran has yet to strike back. Will they ever? Maybe. And that’s the problem, the Jewish Problem: the Jews who rule Palestine and America insist on absolute security for their twin occupation regimes, and this “requires,” sooner or later, a pre-emptive strike on Iran. Our hope must be that, finally, the ZOG will have bitten off more than it can chew. Though the Iranian military is not much of an opponent, they should be able to shut down most of the oil coming out of the Persian gulf region. That will make Japan and China very angry at the U.S. and its rulers, and they in turn will begin shedding dollars to buy oil elsewhere. Not only will we see $200/barrel oil, we may also see the collapse of the dollar itself, and subsequent collapses of the debt-saturated US economy and the ZOG. Then: for us hard rightists, WNs, patriots, and other anti-Jews . . . payback time.
As a second thought: I prefer to look for openings that might set off a chain of events that work to white advantage. I’m less interested in arguing about the Jews’ morality — which I automatically assume is something that wishes us harm.
But I could also be postmodern and accept the relativity of views. Two honorable sides of white intelligence — and we want as many sides as we can organically incorporate into our emerging intellectual assertion of a racially conscious public sphere.
Yes, you could “be postmodern” and accept “relativity” – more O’Meara thrust and parry. In fact I see no advantage at all in incorporating many sides, organically or otherwise, into some “intellectual assertion.” That’s because I think a corollary to “Don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes” applies: “Don’t see the whites of their eyes if you don’t want to shoot.”
Whatever the motivation behind it, keeping the focus blurred is a means to avoid acting.
Thanks to everyone for their comments. I’ll try to respond to some of Michael’s points, hopefully later today or this evening. I agree with him that “we want as many sides as we can organically incorporate into our emerging intellectual assertion of a racially conscious public sphere.”
Let me thank Wodinaz for his remarks. I, too, feel the ethical dimension is important. Are you familiar with Richard McCulloch’s website (and book) The Racial Compact? http://www.racialcompact.com/ McCulloch outlines a vision of peaceful coexistence much like the one you describe.
Stephen:
You raise an important point (one that Michael touches upon as well—so this doubles as a reply to his “reason number one”). Again there is the problem of imperfect information—the norm for most things we deal with in life. However, I am not as optimistic as Michael about Russia, for a variety of reasons. In part this is because he and I have different perspectives about the significance of the Jewish role in contemporary society, and in part because I view the white-Jewish relationship as dominant (Jews) v. subservient (whites). Thus, if I see certain hints (or more) of Jewish influence, I extrapolate in a specific direction from them.
The situation in Russia remains fluid, and crosscurrents in both directions exist. Power is fractured.
Negative signs for me include external Jewish meddling in Russia, the pervasiveness of Jewish organized crime—which no doubt explains the massive sex slave traffic in Eastern European girls and their widespread exploitation in pornographic films and publications—Putin’s close ties to Orthodox Jewry (he also has one or more Jewish billionaire cronies, I believe), public statements by President Dmitry Medvedev in Israel that victory over the Nazis was a “joint victory” and implying that speech about Jews and the Holocaust should be suppressed. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-15/medvedev-netanyahu-call-for-combatting-falsification-of-history.html Indeed, the purpose of Medvedev’s February trip to Israel was to discuss cooperation against Iran.
The upshot: it is my sense that opposition to Jewish power in Russia at the present time is more prevalent among powerless whites than among powerful ones. However, a minority within the elite probably does oppose it.
John Taldone wrote, “If the United States or Israel launched a war of aggression against Iran, the vast majority of European-Americans would enthusiastically support the war-crime.”
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I see American flag and yellow ribbon “Support Our Troops” sticker decals every day, and am thoroughly familiar with the mentality you describe. It is real and pervasive.
Finally I can’t resist simply quoting seadragonconqueror’s observation:
“In fact, the last time Iran (Persia) attacked Europe was c. 470 BC, or thereabouts, when they had a disagreement with the Greeks. Since then Iran has been repeatedly attacked and harrowed by external powers. In the 20th century alone, 1941: attacked, occupied, and partitioned by Brits and Russians; 1951: government overthrown by US and Brit intelligence services, puppet Shah put in power; mid-1980s: US and Israel sponsor bloody aggression by Sadaam Hussein Iraq that kills 1,000,000 Iranian soldiers and civilians. All this, and Iran has yet to strike back.”
If Iran stays an independent country, it will pursue and eventually get its nuclear deterrent to be on a par with its adversaries in the region. But Iran staying independent is a big if. At this point it might be more apt to ask not if there is a chance that the U.S. and Israel will attack Iran, but is there a chance that they won’t attack? Israel wants it in the worst way and when was the last time Israel didn’t get what it wanted from the U.S. Congress? It’s not even about nuclear weapons as much as it is about regime change – Iran doesn’t accept Israel’s legitimacy and that won’t do. Israel will keep pushing – maybe Obama would like to wait until closer to the end of his term in case the economy is still in the tank. An attack then might salvage his reelection. I’m sure Israel will wait as long as they are assured of the end result. Probably the biggest brake on an attack is the U.S. military itself. The Jews hate Ahmadinejad for his impudence but like the fact that the president of the Iranian theocracy has committed heresy against their secular Holocaust religion. He must be insane to question the received history, right? We can kill him then, right?
Michael,
I do not view Islam as the historic enemy of the West. Some Muslims have been enemies at different times in the past, and many are today as well—in the latter case, either with faultless good reason (European servility to Jewish behavior in derogation of legitimate Muslim interests), or absolute predictability (by being spoon-fed institutionally encouraged and nurtured hatred by an intensely anti-white, anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-European Jewish-Gentile elite that coincidentally imported them).
Characterizing Islam as a monolithic enemy of the West for 1,400 years is too sweeping for me. Indeed, reading some of the statements of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad offers momentary surcease from the Orwellian insanity of contemporary discourse.
Muslims imported into our lands must politely be shown the door, or, barring that, separated out.
The true historic enemies of the West already have nukes. They murdered tens of millions of our people, not in the remote past, but now (historically speaking), and their hatred for us burns as fiercely as ever. Is it mere coincidence that precisely during that span of time—from the Bolshevik Revolution to the present—our civilization disintegrated and our population imploded? We now teeter on the brink of biological extinction.
While they occupy the seats of power as never before in the long history of our people, whites lie prostrate.
Absolute power is always undesirable, but absolute nuclear power in the hands of genocidal maniacs is intolerable. Talk of employing tactical nuclear weapons against a weak, isolated Iran is now commonplace.
Looking for openings that might set off a chain of events advantageous to the white race is commendable. Jews can destroy, but cannot build or maintain, a civilization. That is why ours is falling apart.
For whites, exploitable opportunities to date have been far fewer than they logically should have been due to the phenomenon of anarcho-tyranny identified by Samuel Francis. Possibly a break in the nuclear monopoly would be more beneficial in that regard than would its continuance.
Andrew,
I sensed that you were ‘soft’ on Islam. Thank you for making it explicit.
This ‘softness’ is common to a great many racially conscious whites, whose obsession with the Jews prevents them from seeing beyond the danger they pose.
Historically, Islam, as a civilization, has been a greater enemy than the Jews. (Its hostility, moreover, had nothing to do with the Jews — whose influence on the West is a relatively recent occurrence, of the last half century or so).
Europeans were always able to handle their Jewish problem – that is until the post-WWII era, when they were occupied by the Judeo-capitalist forces controlling the US. Then, the entire white world, with the exception of Russia, fell subject to Washington’s ethnocidal reign.
Our present Jewish problem – and this problem has now become the principal one threatening our people – is very much a self-afflicted one. For if we, as a people, hadn’t abandoned our blood and heritage and adopted values reflective of the Jews’ low-minded materialist ones, the latter would never have acquired their present supremacy.
I might add that our Judeo-capitalist elites, despite their idiotic talk of ‘Islamofascism’, have, in the last 30 years, repeatedly mobilized Islamic militants in their covert wars against Russia and Europe.
To avoid a long discourse, let me simply say that the Judeo-capitalist elites ruling the US have not only made us vulnerable to the ‘rising tide of color’, they’ve played a major role in heightening the destructive impact of this tide.
The Jews may be our principal inner enemy, but that does nothing to diminish the outer threat posed by Islam and the rest of the colored world. In resisting the inner enemy, then, we ought not to open the door to the outer enemy – which, I think, your position implies.
Here’s some more information about the Iranian Jews of Beverly Hills and Los Angeles.
The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles published an article last month ( http://www.jewishjournal.com/articles/print/business_fraud_scandals_devastate_las_iranian_jews_20100216/) about three alleged financial swindlers in the Iranian Jewish community accused of cheating hundreds of their fellow Persian Jews of their savings and investments.
The three men are:
Ezri Namvar of Brentwood, a banker, moneylender and real estate investor whose family enjoyed a high business reputation in Iran. Namvar was a large donor to Jewish organizations and to Israel.
John Farahi of Beverly Hills, an investment adviser, stockbroker, and radio talk show host. According to the report, “Both Farahi and his wife moved in high-end social circles within the local Iranian Jewish community and were involved in organizing fundraising events at the West Hollywood-based Temple Beth El, which is owned and operated by the Iranian American Jewish Federation (IAJF). Farahi’s wife, a former IAJF board member, also helped organize high-profile fundraising events in the community for Hilary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid.”
Joseph Boodaie of Beverly Hills, a bookkeeper, businessman, and moneylender.
The three cases are unrelated, and as of last month none of the men faced criminal charges. However, numerous lawsuits by Iranian Jewish investors and the Securities and Exchange Commission have been filed against the defendants. Texas-based Comerica Bank also lost money.
The article mentions a couple of interesting contrasts with former business practices in Iran.
According to one man who lost money, “In Iran when these things happened, the community’s leadership, key businessmen and elders would get together all parties involved and help out those who had suffered the economic loss. Today, unfortunately, we don’t have that here.”
But the reporter also informs us, “The current problems of deceptions in business dealings were rare in Iran prior to the 1979 revolution, elders in the Jewish community say. This is because people who attempted to pass bad checks or failed to repay large debts were put in prison by the government until their families could raise the funds to repay their creditors.”
The Jewish Journal publishes an “Iranian American Jews” blog by the reporter of the article, Karmel Melamed. http://www.jewishjournal.com/iranianamericanjews
Recent entries include: “Obama’s low profile approach to Iran’s human rights violations are shameful,” “Webcast: New Shoah film from Sepher makes a splash!,” “L.A.‘s Iranian Jews join Westwood demonstrations supporting Israel,” and “Jimmy Carter…I don’t accept his bogus apology!”
Let’s not confuse ourselves into thinking that Iranians are friends. They sent millions of dollars and fighters to Kosovo and supported the Kosovo Liberation Army that helped steal one of the most sacred lands of our race from us. I don’t support war with Iran seeing as how that will just prove we are slaves to our jewish masters, but I can’t say I would be too sad if they ended up in a war over there with israel or iraq or whoever else.