By Christopher Donovan | 13 Comments | 
Print
Note to Whites:
Animals Aren’t Children, May Actually Kill You
Dawn Brancheau, the 40-year-old White woman killed by a (surprise) killer whale, was married and had no children. But “she loved the animals like they were her own children,” a family member says.
Allow for a moment my angle on this, which I realize isn’t shared by some White advocates: Dawn Brancheau represents a disturbing trend among Whites whereby puppies, kittens, dogs, cats, horses, orangutans and other beasts are considered their “children.” They collect them, work with them, hoard them, fawn over them and spend absurd amounts of money on them. Meanwhile, they have no actual children — and I’m betting it’s not often because they’re biologically unable.
My unclinical opinion is that this is a form of obsessive compulsive disorder, though possibly with a historical root in an evolutionarily-developed survival affinity for animals (unique to Whites) that can provide food and protection. The latter is understandable, but the former is a problem.
White women seem to be able to think of pretty much anything as their children — except natural children from their own wombs: adopted children from Africa, expensive houses, dogs, even killer whales. It has to stop. Dawn Brancheu was fit and attractive and probably would have borne great White children. Instead, she walked in front of nature’s moving train and got crushed. Can you hear the Black comedians joking about this one? (”Da lady got in the tank with killer whales. And guess what happened?”)
I’ll have to give them this one. Talk about survival of the fittest.
The Occidental Observer Blog, February 25, 2010
Christopher Donovan
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist whose writing has appeared in the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is the media critic for The Occidental Observer (www.theoccidentalobserver.net).
Though I get the point, vis-a-vis White women and their child substitutes, this is a variation of the White man befriends lions/grizzlies/wolves/, only for them to turn upon and kill/eat him, story.
Befriending wild animals, like befriending violent negroes, is the SUREST way to be attacked by them, for their TRUE nature is always there, just below the surface, waiting to be released.
Watch Werner Herzog’s “The Grizzly Man” for that matter.
Evolution has not stopped nor will it ever stop. Not even liberals can stop Evolution.
I really liked this piece for a reason besides its well-written content, and that is that it was a perfect example of using the “white voice” consistently throughout, and an almost perfect example of being “white-centric” except for a reference to black comedians.
This is an extraordinary essay as a demonstration about how to write about white problems (mostly without reference to others) and how to write in the author’s white voice from title to text.
This really is the skill set we need to be modeling for the diverse white American peoples.
It could even be taken farther, and could advocate liberty for killer whales to save thoughtlessly self-sacrificing white lives in public advocacy channels. That would be like advocating for an end to American boots on the ground in Asia, Europe, and Africa on the ground that it would save diverse white American lives, currently sacrificed for no reason.
Let the other groups take care of themselves.
I couldn’t agree with this article more. I am absolutely sick and tired of seeing white women treat their pets as “children.” I just don’t get it — a dog is a dog; a whale is a whale. I think these people have some sort of emotional problem. Maybe they cling to animals and treat them as children because they have difficulties forming human relationships? Why would anyone want to devote their money and attention to an animal? When they die, they will leave nothing to this world.
I’m sorry if this offends anyone, but, with the exception of women who are physically incapable of reproduction, any white woman who doesn’t give birth to at least two children in her lifetime is worthless and should be condemned. While black and Hispanic women are pumping out 4 or 5 kids each, our women are taking their dogs to the playground and complaining about how they can’t fit a child into their busy work schedule. It’s no wonder our race is dying.
Excellent point. I have several extremely beautiful and talented female European friends who have pets and no children. It is a major tragedy just from the standpoint that their beauty is snuffed out forever when their genetic line ends — not to mention their beautiful and compassionate personalities. They talk about their pets as if they were children.
We have a higher devotion and fierce love of children and also animals — especially baby animals. I definitely have this. Even as a male, I go absolutely crazy over everything cute like kittens, children, seals, even baby sharks… We are the most charitable people on Earth too, and I think it is no accident that we Europeans are the first people to pass anti-cruelty laws for animals. This is a big difference between us and other races. Especially blacks. That fits the R-K strategy system from Dr. Rushton in Canada, but I think it is more than that. Maybe it is that we were the first peoples to care for and milk animals, to live with them. I think it is more than that. I think we needed to invest in and love our children more than any other race — even ones with the same fecundity and R-K status. We have more compassion as a race than any other I think (We definitely need more research here).
So think about what we are losing when we become extinct — the beauty yes, but also the intelligence and caring and compassion…. I don’t want to live in a world where these kind of women, and the kind of people they sire, do not exist. We need to be careful because even the cute animals we keep as pets might kill you off if you allow them to substitute emotinally for children and maternal instincts. In that way a kitten can be just as deadly as a killer whale in the long run — deadly to just the type of people we need more of.
Larry, just what form would this ‘condemnation’ of childless women take? I’m sure glad I’ve done my share for the race, with the likes of you running around these parts. By the way, just what would you do with the white men who drop their sperm and then scurry out of the picture like the rodents that they are?
I would suggest that lots of women are not having children because of the brutal birthing procedures that they are rightly afraid of facing. Certainly, I have heard this. In the past, there was a powerful social pressure for women to have babies, so they gritted their teeth and went through with the white-dominated medical industry’s horror show that constitutes bringing a child into the world. After one such experience, lots of women will use any excuse to not revisit the nightmare.
As to the Mexicans, Blacks, etc., I guess that they are somehow tougher or else their culture helps them to overlook the ugliness of the modern way of birth.
Looks like keeping a bull as a pet can be just as fatal as schmoozing with orcas.
The way I see it there have always been spinster types like this, there is no reason to over react to this story and once again hear these strange calls for white women to become “baby factories.” There are more whites now than one hundred years ago, the true problem is the exponential explosion of low IQ brown races now that we’ve given them modern medicine. Our numbers are sustainable considering the limited sources of energy available. It’s the reckless growth in the 3rd world that is unsustainable and the solution is not for us to breed like them, but rather let them lower their birthrates(and stay in their own countries) or face the natural consequences of overpopulation like we saw in Eithiopia in the 80′s.
Stronza
Posted March 1, 2010 at 11:49 am | Permalink
Larry, just what form would this ‘condemnation’ of childless women take? I’m sure glad I’ve done my share for the race, with the likes of you running around these parts. By the way, just what would you do with the white men who drop their sperm and then scurry out of the picture like the rodents that they are?
I don’t exactly understand your outrage at someone trying to make the valid point that white women are shirking their responsibility of producing the next generation of white children, but I’ll answer your questions. What form of “condemnation” am I talking about? I simply mean saying that they are a detriment to our race on sites like this. Did you think I meant they should be stoned or something? As to your question about irresponsible white males, I think they are just as big of a problem and should also be condemned, which is why I chose to marry the mother of my children and always be there for them. Why do you feminist types always get your panties in a bunch when someone simply points out the obvious?
Thanks for your comments & explanations, Larry. Mind you, I could just as soon ask you why you are so quick to declare a woman a “feminist type” because she takes issue with the phrase “worthless and should be condemned.” Your expression holds horrible connotations. But bunched-up knickers or not, I’ll be sticking around here for a bit. As long as Greg will have me, of course.
Not criticizing you, but it is a sad day when men have to congratulate themselves for marrying the mother of their children and “be there” for the children. I am old enough to remember when this went without saying.
Now we know why our ancestors named them killer whales.