Jun 5, 2009

By | 24 Comments

Race-Mixing: Not Just for Losers Anymore?

Television's first interracial kiss

Boldly going where no man has gone before: television's first interracial kiss on "Star Trek"

When most people see whites dating non-whites, the immediate assumption is that there is something wrong with the white. Usually the defects are obvious. We know why a homely or obese white woman is sleeping with blacks or Mexicans: they are willing to overlook her faults because she is white. We know why a geeky, acne-scarred white man gravitates towards Asians: they are willing to overlook his faults because he is white (and of course the aliens are angling for green cards and money as well).

And what about attractive whites who date non-whites? In recent years, more and more white men who are not obvious losers are dating Asians. But according to the conventional wisdom, they probably have hidden physical or psychological defects, such as a self-esteem problem. (Seems pretty reasonable to me.)

Race-mixing is sold as an expression of progress in racial equality: fair Romeos will no longer be separated from their dusky Juliets by the antiquated prejudices of their parents’ generation. But the ugly truth is that race-mixing usually presupposes racism and racial hierarchies. The whites feel that they are dating or marrying down, and the non-whites feel that they are dating or marrying up.

Chris Pine, the new Captain Kirk

Chris Pine, the new Captain Kirk

White losers are attracted to marrying down, because they feel that their grateful partners will overlook their flaws for the privilege of marrying into a superior race, and their non-white partners think the same thing: they could never get a normal white, but they are willing to take up with a subnormal one, because they want to marry into a superior race.

An allied attitude is that non-whites can’t be blamed for wanting to date or marry whites. Their racial betrayal is seen as a completely healthy impulse. The attitude is: “Who could blame black men for pursuing white women? Have you seen black women?” “Who could blame Asian women for wanting to date white men? Just look at Asian men!” (Everybody also knows that Asian men and black women are the big losers in the inter-racial dating game.)

Alan Tudyk & Gina Torres in "Firefly"

Alan Tudyk & Gina Torres in "Firefly"

These are not, moreover, the attitudes of hardcore racists alone. Virtually everyone believes this, white and non-white, race-mixers included. I hold these views, even though I know that there are obviously some cases in which they are not true. (There is enough interaction between the races now that perfectly normal people can form friendships that turn into romances.) But the attitudes persist, because they are what Burke calls “wise prejudices”–based on past experience, repeatedly confirmed by new experiences, and therefore handy heuristic assumptions to maintain when visiting the Bay Area.

But even though everyone believes that white race-mixers are defective, nobody really talks about it. Even the diversity police who obsessively try to expose every other instance of hidden racism, real or imagined, remain silent. I suspect they are silent because they know that a widespread discussion of this attitude would inhibit race-mixing, and they don’t want to do that.

Nathan Fillion in "Firefly"

Nathan Fillion in "Firefly"

White race-mixers may know they are defective, but they think that others do not divine this fact when they parade their non-white paramours in public . If they knew that others saw them as defective, they might not be so enthusiastic about race-mixing. This is especially true of otherwise attractive and normal-looking white race-mixers, who would not be suspected of having hidden flaws if they did not advertise them by pursuing non-white sexual partners.

There has been a certain normalization of white men dating Asians. Because feminism has made so many otherwise attractive white women into bitches, it is easy to understand why perfectly normal white men are tempted to settle for Asian women, as they seem to be more feminine, submissive, and oriented toward home and family.

But even those who defend whites dating Asians as a normal and healthy reaction to a sick society, will immediately assume that there must be something wrong with a white man who dates a black woman. Even the most delirious Yellow Fever victims balk at that.

Hence the normalization of white male/black female pairings has emerged as an identifiable action item on the agenda for white genocide.

Kandyse McClure & Jamie Bamber in "Battlestar Galactica"

Kandyse McClure & Jamie Bamber in "Battlestar Galactica"

For a long time, such parings were quite rare in television and the movies. It seemed easier to sell images of black men as wise mentors, crime fighters, scientific geniuses, US Presidents, and God, than black women as attractive sexual partners for normal, non-defective white men.

Yes, there was the famous kiss between Captain Kirk (William Shatner) and Lt. Uhuru (Nichelle Nichols) in the original Star Trek series, but Kirk was under alien influence. Yes, there was race-mixing in Mandingo (the Marquis de Sade meets Uncle Tom’s Cabin), but the white race-mixers were explicitly shown to be physically and psychologically defective. The same is true in Roots. Yes, there was the neighbor across the hall in The Jeffersons. But he was a dweeb. James Bond, of course, is one of the earliest white miscegenators on the big screen, but we assume he is closing his eyes, holding his nose, and thinking about England. And when Bond marries, he marries a white woman.

But in recent years, there has been a trend towards pairing white Alpha males with black women. Not just normal white males, but superior white males. Heroic white males. Winners, not losers.

Rosario Dawson as Alexander's queen Roxane

Rosario Dawson as Alexander's queen Roxane

The first time this struck me was in Oliver Stone’s 2004 film Alexander, in which Alexander the Great (you can’t get more Alpha than Alexander the Great), played by Colin Farrell, is paired with the mulatto Rosario Dawson, who is cast as Roxane, Alexander’s queen. (The historical Roxane was the daughter of a Persian aristocrat. She was reputed to be one of the most beautiful women in the Empire. She was probably as Aryan as Alexander himself.)

Then there is Joss Whedon’s superb but short-lived 2002 science fiction series Firefly, in which starship pilot Hoban Washburne, played by the very Nordic Alan Tudyk, is married to Zoë, a black Amazon with grotesquely large lips played by Gina Torres. The character of “Wash” is something of a dork, and he is not the captain of the ship, so he is not the real Alpha. The captain, Malcolm Reynolds (played by Nathan Fillion) is a true Alpha male, and his romantic interest is a white woman, Inara (played by the beautiful Morena Baccarin). But in one episode he is shown lusting after Zoë as well.

In another science fiction series, the new Battlestar Galactica, Alpha male Lee Adama, played by the Nordic Jamie Bamber, marries green-eyed mulatto Dualla, played by Kandyse McClure. (Admittedly, the character is punishing himself and the white woman woman he really wants to marry. But he could have punished himself with another white woman.)

Jamie Bamber with his real family

Jamie Bamber with his real family

Finally, in the new Star Trek movie, the Alpha male, Captain Kirk, played by the Nordic Chris Pine, is shown lusting after a black woman and even a green woman–but never a white woman. (This essay originally began as a review of Star Trek, but I have nothing to add to Jonathan Pyle’s superb Occidental Observer essay “Star Trek and the Multiracial Future.”)

I am sure that many other examples can be provided.

Why is Hollywood portraying white Alpha males pursuing and even marrying black women? Because they want the Beta males, the Gamma males, and everybody else down to the Omega males, to follow them down the path to white racial extinction.

The people who create these movies–the directors, the writers, the producers, the casting directors–are not artists. They are abortionists. They are aborting the whole future of the white race. And they are not doing it by accident. We know this, because so many of them are Jews, who are constantly reminded from birth that marrying out leads to extinction for them, and they know that goes for us too. (The fact that many of these Jews marry out make them even worse. It means that they are committing genocide against their own people as well as ours.)

When the white nationalist movement can mobilize the numbers, the idealism, and the physical courage evoked by the anti-abortion movement, then I will stop fearing for the future of my race. And even then, it will take a full-blown revolution, not merely a constitutional amendment, to save us.

Share

  1. Observer said:

    Interesting article, but the description of Alan Tudyk as being “Nordic” surprised me a bit, given he’s of Polish descent.

  2. “We know this, because so many of them are Jews, who are constantly reminded from birth that marrying out leads to extinction for them, and they know that goes for us too. (The fact that many of these Jews marry out make them even worse. . . .)”

    Speaking of God’s Chosen, here’s a video featuring them that you might like to post here – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxt9HwfPwPo

  3. Trevor Lynch said:

    I thought Tudyk was Dutch, but that is beside the point. Nordic Slavs are Nordics too. Nordic is a racial type. It does not map out neatly on particular nationalities, religions, or language groups.

  4. Truly blatant was Something New, about the romance of a stuck-up, ambitious black professional woman and a white man who’s a bit of a slacker. They’re set up by her Jewish woman friend, who in the course of the film has her own wedding, which appears to be a traditional Jewish one. I didn’t sense a trace of irony, that the Jewess is encouraging her Gentile friends to race-mix, while she mates with her own kind.

  5. Trevor Lynch said:

    Something New sounds like it was made to illustrate my thesis: the defective white man (the slacker) knows he could never date a white professional woman, so he dates a black. The black feels she could never date a normal white man, so she is willing to put up with laziness and lack of focus because she wants someone from a superior race.

    As for portraying the Jewish woman encouraging miscegenation for Gentiles but marrying her own kind, and doing so without commenting on the double standard involved: this is, pardon my French, manna from heaven.

    In the past, Jews would instinctively know that this is not something to show the Goyim. Today, however, more and more Jews seem so confident of their power that they are dropping the mask. This is another recent trend in the propasphere about which I plan to write.

    • ‘Something New’ was written and directed by a Black woman, not a Jew.

      Depicting Black women as sexual partners for White men is not rare at all. Pairing Black female singers with Whites is especially popular. What’s rare, however, is depicting Black *men* as sexual partners for White women.

      Some other examples:

      – The Bodyguard (singerWhitney Houston and Kevin Costner)
      – A Bronx Tale (young Italian boy with a Black girl, directed by Robert De Niro who is always with Black women)
      – Boy Meets World (Shawn Hunter’s girlfriend)
      – 21 Jump Street (Nearly all of Holly Robinson’s love interests are White, including the two leads Peter DeLuise and Johnny Depp)

      How could you forget the graphic sex scene with Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thorton in Monster’s Ball is beyond me. And Thorton’s character is a racist (how ironic). In fact, it is not uncommon for bigots to participate in miscegenation with Black women; they’ve been doing so since the Atlantic Slave Trade.

      Today’s African American’s have White blood, and it is guaranteed it always comes from the father’s side. They showed a white family on the news who had met their black cousins, after tracing back their ancestry to a great-grandfather. The man had children with his white wife as well as children with his (presumably ex-slave) black mistress.

      No one cares if a White man is partnered with a Black or a Non-White female in the media. It is acceptable because the White man is seen as the most desirable, and can (and should) have any other man’s woman he wants. It is when a Non-White male is with a White female, especially Black, is when something becomes highly controversial and forbidden.

  6. Chris Pine has Jewish ancestry.

    From http://www.answers.com/topic/chris-pine

    “Pine was born in Los Angeles, California to Robert Pine and Gwynne Gilford; he also has an older sister, Katherine. His father was an actor who had a contract with Universal, while his mother was an actress and is now a practicing psychotherapist. His maternal grandparents were Anne Gwynne, a Hollywood actress, and Max M. Gilford, a Hollywood attorney. Pine is of Welsh and Jewish descent on his mother’s side.”

  7. great article.. best quote would be” Because feminism has made so many otherwise attractive white women into bitches”

  8. Taylor:”Chris Pine has Jewish ancestry.”

    Chris Pine is likely no more than 1/8 Jewish, meaning he really isn’t Jewish at all aside from a tiny bit of distant ancestry. Very many millions of people have similarly small amounts of distant Jewish ancestry nowadays in many White nations worldwide. Distant and/or small amounts (1/4 or less) of Jewish ancestry is no big deal unless that person also has your typically Jewish subversive/destructive anti-White mentality.

    Even the German National Socialists (“Nazis”), who were of course very anti-Jewish, allowed the German “mischlinge” (“crossbreeds”) who were 1/4 Jewish or less to remain classified as German citizens and as such didn’t persecute them unless they were also Soviet sympathizers/communists, hypercapitalistic plutocrats, degenerate artists, lying journalists, criminals, or other social subversives.

  9. It seems to me that the propaganda of putting White men with black and mulatto women in the media has failed. The men have more sense to resist that propaganda. They’re not seeking Oprahs, Halles, and the Mariahs. Vast majority of White men are dating/marrying/having families with White women and that’s the way it should be. Why would he trade 200,000 years of evolution with a race that haven’t found a way to harness natural resources, let alone manufactured anything beyond the basics or invent a written word/math etc? Think about it.

    Belle

  10. Occam's Meataxe said:

    And yet there’s more race-mixing every year. It’s up to 1 in 5 new marriages in the US these days. Black men and White women is still the most popular – and it does tend to be the most successful Black men. Next is Asian women and pretty much anyone who’s not an Asian man, and that’s just as true when the women are US citizens.

    It’s an established scientific fact that there are genetic advantages to race-mixing from better oxygen transport to greater resistance to disease. And there’s a natural human tendency, once again measurable, to look for partners who are exotic, not closely related to you.

    The same Jews you praise for recognizing that marrying out means “extinction” pay a heavy price for their (measurably) higher intelligence. Marriages are cancelled because of the risk of Tay-Sachs disease and other artifacts of severe inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity.

    I’ve seen the future. It’s beige. All White, all Black, all on their way out.

  11. Zalmoxis said:

    The kind of barbaric and unintelligent posts made by “simon humphries”, “lilo”, and “janecole” should show a cultured man everything he needs to know about those promoting race-mixing.

    As for “Occam’s Meataxe”, he’s a propagandist trying to use Liberal pseudoscience (Liberal-Jewish “science” has been proven by researchers like Kevin MacDonald to be pseudoscientific) to justify the destruction of races by race-mixing. William G. Simpson scientifically proves that any race-mixing is ultimately destructive in Chapter 18 of his book Which Way Western Man?.

    But furthermore, even if there are some “advantages” to race-mixing, regardless of those the immense damage done by mixing outweighs any supposed physical advantages. Still more, any genetic issues we have can be cleaned out through humanitarian Eugenic practices, so miscegenation would be unnecessary as well as destructive.

    Also, history and science proves that people do not look for “exotic” mates, but want to breed with their own type (I could cite Simpson again, or many other sources). Some of us probably even remember that as children we instinctually felt that races were different and that there was something wrong about multiculturalism and mixing. Nature and history proves that miscegenation is against instinct and natural development, not the other way around as Liberal liars who lack education assert.

    We naturally value our own White European racial type, which our great history proves to be valuable, and want to preserve it from fools and manipulators who seek to destroy it.

    And further still, we must view race as more than just biology. Scientific materialism does not help us understand what race truly is. We need the deeper spiritual-cultural-historical understanding that Julius Evola, Alfred Rosenberg, Frank L. DeSilva, etc. attempted to give us. As Alfred Rosenberg wrote in The Myth of the Twentieth Century:

    “Race is the image of soul. The entire racial property is an intrinsic value without relationship to material worshippers who apprehend only discrete events in time and space, without experiencing these events as the greatest and most profound of all secrets … Racial history is therefore simultaneously natural history and soul mysticism.”

    Someday in the future (regardless of how far or near) we will rise again, and woe unto those who foolishly continue to attack European people and attempt to destroy it through mixing and deception. It may appear that we cannot rise again, that Jews with their media control can continue slandering us and brushing us aside, but as Corneliu Z. Codreanu wrote in For My Legionaries (although in a different situation from us because of his time and place):

    “They will have only one effect: that of amassing in our souls injustice after injustice, calumny after calumny, blow after blow, pain after pain. Our youth has stood them all, burying them in its soul. Now, so many years later, if I wanted to give the world advice, I would shout: Beware of those who endure it for too long!”

  12. Noble Wolf said:

    I would also like to comment on the pro-race-mixing on this article, by providing a quote which puts into perspective not only the hypocrisy of Liberals, but also the danger of their actions and views.

    “They fail to see that the so-called “cultural diversity” they claim to admire would vanish in a One World system. No, true “cultural diversity” values the different material and spiritual achievements of a people uniquely different from all others on the planet. Therefore it cannot exist without the barriers which separate and identify culture from culture.”
    — Tenzin Gyatso (14th Dalai Lama) From 1993 Chicago Conference on World Religions

  13. Krystal said:

    Behind the high-sounding slogans portraying miscegenation as morally imperative and beneficial, the motivation of its proponents is clear: the intention is not to “save” or “redeem” Whites, but to destroy them completely. What such “morality” really derives from is a totally subjective, alien mind-set which seeks the biological extinction of the White race, and which, from its own perspective, sees such an extinction as a good and righteous thing.

    • Kathiravan Isak Arulampalam said:

      Yes, but why would miscegenation be such a bad thing? The very notion has no actual biological backing, as all humans are, when it comes down to it, on average the same. Really, look at Brazil. After a couple of generations of inbreeding, one comes down to no previous races existing, but instead an ever more complex and intermingling genetic web of relations and abilities. All races would be razed under total genetic intermingling, and a thousand new ones would replace them, and so on, as humanity reinvents itself genetically by constant mingling between different races. Morally imperative I would hesitate to call it, simply for the fact of it being every person’s individual choice who they would like to be parent to their offspring, but I would call it genetically beneficial, or at least not harmful on average.
      Humanity is not truly divided into races, even though I have used that particular wording here, but is instead divided into people of recently shared heritage who look fairly alike and sometimes share cultural denominators. Most humans are related just a thousand years back, if interracial breeding becomes the norm, it will not eradicate a human race, but simply change it, spread different characteristics in different directions, and new human races will come of it, sharing the same genetic heritage, just looking slightly different.

  14. Asian chick said:

    White men who go after Asian women are mostly losers.

    Asian men are NOT losers, its just they normally don’t prefer white women, thats why AM/WF couples are far less than WM/AW couples.

    In fact 99% of those Asian women who go out with white men are not considered pretty or attractive, who obviously can’t get a normal Asian partner at home. So no Asian men would feel jealous as what white men think, because white men are taking their junks in mouth.

    As a normal East Asian(Japanese) woman I can clarify that mostly of East Asian women prefer our own type and not interest in any white men, just look at how they look(from our standard Asian men are better)! So your arrogancy of being white have no room in East Asia

  15. I thought I was the only one who assumed there was something wrong with the white male if he was dating a non-white. This article touches on a lot of my own personal beliefs especially when an asian female acquaintance was talking about how much she would want a half white half asian baby.

  16. Sarah Yoshida said:

    Someone sounds bitter? Why do you even care if races are mixing? It’s going to happen whether your pathetic racist ass likes it or not. People have different ideas of what’s attractive, some people like girls with tan skin, some girls like boys with blue eyes….some people think asian, black, or white features are just more attractive, it has nothing to do with social classes. I’m not an ugly white female, i’ve had many offers of football players and such wanting to date me, I just didn’t like them, they were arrogant, and I didn’t find them attractive in any way. When I met my (japanese) husband, I thought he was the cutest boy on the planet, and his deep brown eyes had me from the first minute. Never once did a racist/social status kind of thought pass my mind, or on his either, he was kind and handsome, and he thought I was nice and pretty. Since when do you dissect the relationships or crushes you have? In your life, have you always done “Look at her white skin, I can date her so my race can be preserved.” I think that is the worst scenario, for god’s sake, why would you date anyone JUST because you can preserve your race? Your going to miss out on meeting a lot of nice people. You remind me of a white guy I once had a crush on, he took me to a dance in high school, until I found out he was a flaming racist, he starting saying all sorts of filthy violent things, what poor company! A nice black boy asked me to dance, and you know what? He treated me BETTER than anyone else ever has on a date! Never once did he make a move on me, he was polite and a gentleman, which is more than I can say for the racist guy. Racial supremacy? It’s nothing but a terrible joke.

  17. Yeah, sure there are no differences between races, maybe thats why germany has all the technological and artistic advaces as you can see in burundi or filipinas. When the white race dissapears of earth there will be no more scientific progress and people will get back to the jungle as monkeys

  18. Always a Lady said:

    This whole article is pathetic and I totally agree with Carmen. The God that I serve is in no way inferior therefore, HE can not create anything inferior. The belief that the “white race” or any other race for that matter is superior over others is plain stupid. I am an African American Woman and I am not superior over anyone. However, NO ONE is superior over me either; if I fall in love with a white man that is my business, but I will never think that he is in anyway better than me and vice versa. I do not consider marrying a white moving up any more than I consider marrying a black man marrying down. I know my worth and because I AM A BLACK WOMAN DOES NOT mean that I am less attractive, articulate, nor less moral than ANY other woman from a different race. Get educated and Stop generalizing everybody. As once stated people can only make you feel inferior only if you give them permission so in other words, I do not accept the negative opinions of people with closed minds concerning me or my race because they do not keep me breathing and they do not make nor break me!

  19. golden dawn said:

    ‘carmen’ u are a stupid woman lol just keep parroting what your joo masters tell u, there is no such thing as the ‘human race’ moron we are ‘human species’ eg dog and cats both animals but different understand?? oh god I HATE COMMIES! 1488

  20. That Chick said:

    Tell me where it says that in the Bible. Can’t? That’s cause it doesn’t. Stop spreading bullshit. It makes you look stupider.

    Thankfully, someone did the research for me and all I have to do is shove it in your uneducated face:

    There are a few incidental mentions of race in the Bible (e.g., that Ethiopian’s skin was different, Jeremiah 13:23), but there is nothing saying one race is superior to another. Moses was married to a Cushite (Ethiopian) woman (Numbers 12:1-16), and God was angry with Aaron and Miriam for criticizing that marriage.

    The Hebrews were forbidden to marry Canaanites (Exodus 34:10-17; Deuteronomy 7:3-4). The reason was because the Canaanites worshipped idols, not because of race; the Hebrews and Canaanites were racially similar.

    The apostle Paul encouraged Christians not to marry unbelievers (2 Corinthians 6:14), but here again, the reason was religious, not racial.

    Jesus and His apostles taught that we must respect and show compassion for all people of God’s creation without regard to artificial distinctions like race and nationality. In His Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), Jesus told of a Samaritan man who was kind to a Jewish man even thought they were enemies of different religions, nationalities and ethnic backgrounds. At the end, Jesus tells us, “Go and do likewise.”

    The Apostle Paul banned all discrimination based on race, social status, etc. among Christians:

    You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (NIV, Galatians 3:26-28)

    -BAM!

    All mainstream Christian churches fully approve of interracial dating and interracial marriage.

  21. Yeah, but God also created diversity !! The race mixing destroys that. Yes race-mixing is just good for non-whites. They know we have recessive genes so its easy to mix us, easy mainly for blacks. Mullatos look generally look like blacks and take their identity. I hate when I see “beatiful black women” ( as I read articles) a definitly in their features is evident they are half white. I would see If non-whites mix with us when mutual kids look white and take caucasian identity.

Back to Top