By News Desk | 9 Comments | 
Print
Racial Integration Jumps the Shark
Perhaps they should adopt a sassy black child.
“No, We Can’t: The Impossibility of a Black British Head of State”
Peter Tatchell
The Huffington Post, January 20, 2010
As President Barack Obama celebrates his first year in the Oval Office, it is clear that the vast majority of the US public are relaxed and comfortable about having an African American head of state. Many dispute his policies but his race is no longer really an issue — which is how it should be.
In Britain, however, we can only dream of a black head of state. It isn’t going to happen any time soon because the UK system is rigged against a black leader. Black and Asian Britons are effectively barred by the system of hereditary monarchy.
For the foreseeable future, as in centuries past, no African, Asian, Arab, Caribbean or Latino Briton is eligible to assume role of British head of state.
Under Britain’s constitutional system, the head of state is the monarch – at present Queen Elizabeth II, head of the House of Windsor. The position of monarch and head of state is inherited through the Windsor family line. The Windsors are white and only their descendants are eligible to be monarch and British head of state. The result is a de facto race bar. . . . For more swill, click here.
News Desk
Please contact the Editor if you have news items that you think are relevant to TOQ readers.
What a despicable article. A degenerate Australian who brought his anti-monarchism with him to Britain. I’m no lover of the Windsor family and they do a great disservice to their people. However, whether we like them or not they are representative of a proud and ancient Aryan institution. It seems republicans in the former British Empire aren’t complacent with fermenting their egalitarianism in the former colonies but are trying their hand in the Mother Country itself! Which is perhaps more logical, destroy the tradition in England and the colonies will be forced to as well. I’m reminded of Drew Fraser’s excellent article “Monarchs and Miracles: Australia’s Need for a Patriot King” from the Spring 2005 Vol. 5, No. 1 edition of the world’s finest journal.
Of course it’s a colonial who wrote the article, as D. H. Lawrence wrote in Kangaroo:
I fear this particularism of the English and English liberal has been destroyed.
“Many dispute his policies but his race is no longer really an issue — which is how it should be.”
What an obvious lie.
Most Whites are not at all comfortable with him, just look at his approval ratings – which are better refered to now as his disapproval ratings.
Or, can you say Officer Crowely?
This is typical of the MSM and Academia in general. Two prominent and effective mouthpieces of the Hostile Elite.
Promote an absurd lie as if it’s an absolute truth.
And any response other than blind obedience is “proof” of intellectual stupidity and moral depravity.
To me THIS is what is meant by Chutzpah.
His race was why he was chosen, by the chosen. Obviously.
His race was the reason behind the psycho-sentimental hysteria and adulation that he receieved and that a fully Judaized, Politically Correct culture had trained him to expect.
His race is what he and the MSM uses to deflect criticism and shield themselves while projecting their many character defects on to anyone who doesn’t agree with them.
His race is what the chosen use to conceal their real motives for putting him in office, ie; to pump up the volume on their Invite the World – Invade the World – In•hoc to the World policies.
But even as he is being praised it’s becoming clear already that they are chewing him up now and will spit him out later. Already the tide is turning in regard to MSM coverage of Neocon Sarah Palin.
She has a kind of safety net to protect her and hers. It’s called Alaska.
I don’t think she will do it on purpose, I think the Hostile Elite, Poker Face and typical arrogance aside, are well aware that this can’t go on forever and are pulling all the stops.
No, I don’t think she’ll do it voluntarily (though you never know. She is after all, a politician).
I think they’ll hold her at gun-point, so to speak.
Or they’ll bring her to a big conference room, a la Network, stare her down, and tell her what they want her to do while running the Zapruder film over and over again.
What’s she going to do?
And would it surprise anyone here?
They’re already holding us all hostage!
The Tatchell person who wrote this hate-filled article, would perceive himself to be a member of a minority group, ie, Gay. As with all deviants of the Marxist Liberal persuasion, his rantings are no surprise.
Non-whites have no rights to be residing in Britain or, for that matter, any ancestral White homeland at all let alone entertaining lofty ambitions of becoming rulers of an ancestral White homeland. They kicked Whites out of theirs and in the countries where Whites still remain, non-whites are currently collectively engaged in kicking them out too.
Let’s face it, are we seeing Whites anywhere in the non-white world presiding over non-whites whether upon a throne or on a parliamentary seat? Not likely!
Extreme Marxist anti-white haters like Tatchell, a leftover from the degenerate 1960′s hippy era, should be deported to any one of the lands of those he obviously holds a fettish for, ie, Arabs, Indians, Negroes and Orientals.
I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t be long before he’d be on the first flight back to whitey land once he found out just what passes for tolerance in ancestral non-white societies, in relation to certain types of degenerate tendencies and associated behaviour.
In case anyone doesn’t remember, the author of the above article is the same homosexual activist who made headlines after being punched in a Moscow anti gay parade rally.
The article leads me to believe the world has gone completely mad, then the comments remind me that it’s just the journalists. Before comments were invented, we all just had to assume that we were the madmen.
Homosexual activists like Tatchell, along with their fellow travelers….lesbian, and feminist activists, are parasites upon White society. What they fail to recognise, due to their insane hatred of everything White, is that they are drilling holes in the boat in which they, themselves, are passengers.
What they fail to recognise, due to their insane hatred of everything White, is that they are drilling holes in the boat in which they, themselves, are passengers.
Bravo Hengist!
Debating abstract ideology/theology with these lunatics only empowers them, even if they only advance a small smidgen, they still advance. Instead they must be pointed out and have the mantle of responsibility for the genocide of whites placed squarely on their heads.
Why Minorities Can’t Lead America
by David Yeagley · January 28, 2010 · 25 Comments · ShareThis
Barry Soetoro (often called “Barack Hussein Obama”–may his name be changed, inshallah) is a profound example of the inability of a minority to lead a majority, and the impropriety of such an assignment. That such a disconnected, alien individual should be put in charge of the greatest nation on earth simply demonstrates the imbalanced introspection, and the foolishness of self-righteous idealism to which that great nation has drifted. “Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked…then he forsook God, which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation,” to quote an ancient Hebrew (Deuteronomy 32:15).
It is the special liability of greatness to fail in self-understanding, to credit itself for being, and to deny the true source and origins of its power. But, on the personal level, or on the national level, success is more accidental than created, more circumstantial than achieved. Those to understand something of the Creator, understand something of the nature of greatness. The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. (Ecclesiastes 9:11.)
A bit much? Lincoln’s words in a 1858 debate with Stephen A. Douglass. Astounding? Maybe not. For the entire quote, see:
The Liberty Tree.
The seat of power in this world was been created through the white race. Through it’s connection with the true God, by predilection or by choice, the scepter has be held in white hands. “The Great White Throne,” we have called it, metaphorically. The notion that a foreign race, a godless heathen, could successfully occupy that Throne is a notion that reveals the godlessness that has grown up in the white race, particularly in America. It is the expression of a self-congratulatory, self-idolizing, and self-righteous sentiment, born of a profound displacement, yea, ignorance, of the true God. God created the nations, and the ethnicities, and the races. To dismiss this would seem ominous, (to assign such a purpose to Christian faith, blasphemous).
It may be pawned off as an act of transcendent charity, sharing the Great White Throne with an irresponsible, dubious, black juvenile–who clearly has no idea of what he’s doing, or even supposed to do, but it is not true charity. It is merely self-idolizing on the part of whites. It is goodness gone too far. It is the generosity of centuries finally made into a self-awarded badge of honor. While it may seem the apogée of of nobility, while it might even appear to be self-sacrificing, putting a alien Negro (who is not American in any real sense of the word) in charge of country is the epitome of self-destruction. It is in fact ignoble, and disgraced. This is always the final result of self-righteousness. In this case, it is a white race who has neglected to honor its fathers, a nation who has taken credit for its own status, denying the faith of the founders, and the role God played in their values and vision for the nation. The sons play with the riches, without cherishing the discipline it took to earn them. The sons toy with honor, rather than earn it.
That the race through whom power was made in the world should offer the seat of that power to the weakest of the weak, may provide a ‘jolly good show” for some moralistic, philosophical fireside pipe-smoking conversation in some quiet, dignified parlor in an out-of-the-way hunting mansion in Britain, but, the entertainment is nigh too costly. Can the white race recover from its extraordinary kindness?
The fact is, if the whites don’t recover, it spells disaster for the dark races of the world. The Third World depends on the great White Throne. It is in the best interests of the colored races to follow the whites, not try to lead them. It is not an expression of “equality” for the whites to offer power to the coloreds. It is the expression of condescention, and a self-destructive condescention at that. And, again, any power freely given, inappropriately given, improprietously given, to the darks, disables them from improvement. They are thus robbed of the lessons for their own learning–the want of which is the cause of their dependent position in the world.
And the most obvious, most crippling element is the inevitability of race, of minority race interests, confusing and denigrating the general status of the dominant white society. There is one thing that all can be sure of: the minority in power has his own minority interests at heart. This is in principle, in policy, and in action. Barry has behaved as a black man so thoroughly, so completely, that this is the nature of his leadership. His approach has been to force the black face in the white face, day in and day out. Though he pretended to decry the idea that “the most important thing is to be a celebrity — it doesn’t matter what you do as long as you get on TV,” this has been precisely his approach to presidency. He obviously feels that the best thing he can do for himself and for Negroes is to put his face on television 24/7. That way, white will get used to blacks, and maybe even forget the blackness, like Chris Matthews. Equality will finally be achieved.
BadEagle.com was assessed recently by an Ethiopian seer by the name of Kidist Paulos Asrat (Camera Lucinda). Asrat title her piece, “Indians will be Indians.” She determined that, for all my conservative efforts, in the last analysis, my first interest was in Indians.
David does this, to a certain extent. But, here starts the contradiction. Despite a professed love for America, I think David, naturally, loves Indians first – and best. So he has to find ways to incorporate the defeat of his people with their uncomfortable and humiliating lives in modern America. Hence, his strange, and constant, discussions of the subliminal effects of Indians on America, and even the world.
I shall not challenge this profound insight, but rather employ it as an example of the truth of my own words in reference to the Great White Throne, and the impossible notion that any but a white person could successfully occupy it. I cite the Amharan seer as acute assent.
I will add, however, that my notion that Indians are exemplary is only in the matter of nationhood. Indians have demonstrated what it means to love and cherish your own people to the point of sacrificing. Indians would never allow or want a non-Indian person to be chief. Indians would never accept much less elect a non-Indian as a tribal chairman or governor. Look at the case of Quanah Parker, the government-appointed “chief” of the Comanche. He was hotly hated for this un-Comanche position. It was contrary to all Comanche tradition. It wasn’t our way. Plus, Quanah was half-white, and the white man, the government and the ranchers, took advantage of that fact. And Agent James M. Hayworth assigned a half-dozen body guards to protect Quanah from the Comanches.
Quanah Parker, ca. 1852-1911
(They used to say Quanah took baths in extra hot water to rid himself of his white blood. Well, Barry married an American black woman.)
Posted by David Yeagley · January 28, 2010 · 11:30 am CT · ShareThis·
Tags: American Indians · Bad Eagle Journal · Negro Race · Politics · Race · White Race
——————————————————————————–
Read More Journal Posts »