Jun 1, 2009

By | 6 Comments | Print Print

Jared Taylor Responds to Justin Raimondo on Takimag

“What do White Nationalists Want?”
by Jared Taylor
from Taki’s Magazine, June 1, 2009

Jaredy Taylor

Jared Taylor

Lost in Justin Raimondo’s torrent of mistaken assumptions and wild accusations is one useful question: What do “white nationalists” want? By putting the term in quotation marks, Mr. Raimondo has stumbled onto an important truth, namely, that there is no accepted term for contemporary Americans who still hold some of the views about race that were taken for granted by virtually all Americans until about the 1950s.

Until then, most people believed race was an important aspect of individual and group identity. They believed that the races differed in temperament and ability, and whites preferred the societies built by whites to those built by non-whites. They wanted the United States to be peopled by Europeans because they believed only people of European stock would maintain the civilization they valued. These views were so wide-spread, so taken for granted, so indisputable that there was no term for them. Just as there was no name for people who expected the sun to rise in the East, there was no name for people whose views are today sometimes given the clumsy term “white nationalism.”

The national-origins immigration policy that lasted until 1965 embodied this basic understanding of race. As one of the supporters of that policy, Congressman William Vaile of Colorado explained in 1924, “[the United States] is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different.” I might add that even if this sentiment shocks Americans today, it is exactly the view of their own country held by virtually every Japanese, Israeli, or Mexican. . . . More

Share

Related Posts

  1. Well said, Mr. Taylor! Well said! I hope 10,000 more people like you find their voice and use it for our cause. How any rational human being could find fault with your logic is beyond me. How can JR possibly respond negatively to this line of thinking?

  2. Bravo Mr. Taylor, Bravo!

  3. That Raimondo is our enemy doesn’t make Taylor our friend. “If this is a free country, why can’t we be free of the Jews?”

  4. So if JT isn’t totally, completely, and absolutely on board with the jewish issue he’s not our friend? I think not.

    Moreover, not everyone who recognizes the Jewish problem is our friend either.

    For instance, I’ll take JT as an advocate for our cause over losers who recognize the Jewish problem but look, dress, and act the part assigned to them by the media. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

  5. What is Raimondo’s ethnicity?

  6. Donning a coat and tie doesn’t justify lying about the Jews.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: Abusive, irrelevant, spammy, or trollish comments are prohibited. Repeat violations of this policy will result in a permanent ban.

Back to Top