By Yggdrasil | 30 Comments |
Print
Princeton Tries to Explain a Drop in Jewish Enrollment; or “What is Communism?”

Folks, as you can tell from the title, this post is about the “inner party.” For an explanation of “inner party” see “What It Would Take to Cleanse Serbia” Specifically, it is about the durability of the inner party. Can it keep its power? Can it last?
The drop off point for our discussion is the war in Kosovo and the central question that no commentators have seen fit to ask. Cohen, Albright (Korbel), Berger, Clark (Nemerovski) and the rest of the inner party crew embarked upon this war to impose multiculturalism on Serbia. From press reports it appears that all of the principals believed that Milosevic and the Serbs were cowards and that they would surrender within 3 days.
The question is, how could they entertain such an idea?
Suppose Israel lacked nuclear weapons and we were to bomb them from 15,000 feet over some policy disagreement. Would the geniuses of the inner party assume that the Israelis would give up in three days?
Are we to assume then that in the minds of the inner party Serbs and Israelis have fundamentally different human natures?
In truth, the Inner Party doesn’t know a thing about the Serbians. They think they do because Milosevic seemed “biddable” when dealing with the fate of irredent Serb populations in Croatia and Bosnia earlier in this decade. However, the notion that he would be equally biddable once the bombs began falling on Serbia proper was inexplicably naive.
But it was more than Naive.
The visceral inner party hatreds against Serbia are driven by the perception that Serbia is a nationalist state that defines itself as existing for the benefit of a distinct people. Thus, the very quality that provokes hatred from the inner party should logically compel the conclusion that Serbia and its leaders would resist fiercely, as would the Israelis under similar circumstances. After all, both are racial states (albeit in thinly costumed drag, for the benefit of the media and pubic opinion).
On the surface the critic might be tempted to conclude that this expectation of easy victory is one more evidence of irrationality by the inner party – and on one level it is. But this fundamental misjudgment tells us something much more important about the inner party.
In fact, the assumption that Serbia would quickly surrender tells us more about the inner party’s opinion of us – the Euro-American sheeple with which they are familiar – than of a Serbian nation of which they are obviously ignorant.
After all, it is certainly true that Connecticut would have surrendered in three days!
The inner party believes that Euro-American racists are cowards, so why wouldn’t Serbs be cowards as well? As professor Kevin MacDonald has pointed out, the evolutionary psychology of the inner party causes them to believe their own propaganda. Belief prevents Freudian slips and has survival value for minorities living in diaspora. Unlike the claptrap we were fed as undergraduates, Professor MacDonald’s theories have predictive and explanatory value in the real world of current events.
The living members of the inner party simply never encounter racially aware members of the Euro-American majority in their daily lives. They cannot imagine a European elite that would suffer along with their own kind to ensure their ethnic independence and integrity, because they never meet such people in The U.S.
To the inner party, Euro Elites throughout the world protect their own power and economic status as individuals or as members of a class. Thus, the fundamental message of the Kosovo war is that, in the eyes of the inner party, any interest the Euro peoples of the world may have in cultural or racial survival is unrepresented. Thus, in the minds of the inner party, the natural state of Western Cultures and Western societies is decapitation. They are leaderless and defenseless.
The very thought of a renegade European state – Serbia – that has not been decapitated – that is not leaderless or defenseless – is an affront to the inner party. It is a threat to their hegemony over the European peoples of the World.
Having described a modern instance, it is time to move to the very core problem.
But by way of introduction, I must discuss the three basic strategies of the inner party for coping with exposure.
If the facts underlying the exposure are wrong, the media will quickly carry stories from the university professor contingent of the inner party and demonstrate that the facts are false.
If the facts underlying the exposure are true, then the inner party will use its anti-defamation forces to demonize the one doing the exposing. The argumentum ad hominem is the most important visible tool in the inner party’s defensive arsenal.
However, the most damaging forms of exposure typically are those that would threaten the cooperation of the elites of the outer party and thus endanger inner party’ control over these elites. The inner party has a strategy for handling such exposures. They are ignored. I call it the “blackout” strategy.
Thus, the most interesting and important facts about the inner party are those which are unmentioned and ignored. Truly dangerous critics of the inner party are routinely subjected to the blackout. Gore Vidal slipped down the memory hole a long time ago.
And indeed, the most important intellectual quality that we can develop – the most important for the long run survival of our people – is to detect a “blackout ” and pursue its mysteries until the underlying riddle is understood.
And the “holy grail” – the mother or all inner party blackouts – is the utter void of information or meaningful commentary about the process by which the members of the inner party were maneuvered out of the top ranks of the Soviet Hierarchy from 1928 through about 1940.
How could the inner party, who’s members occupied 90% of the top positions in the Soviet Union in 1924, including virtually all the top positions in the secret police, concentration camp system and intelligence agencies ever be displaced by Stalin and his badly outnumbered allies?
Inquiring minds want to know.
It is the central puzzle of the Twentieth Century. Solve that puzzle and we will – for reasons I shall explain later in this essay – gain significant insight into the odds of our survival.
Put bluntly, the central question is whether it is possible for the inner party to sustain, over any considerable period of time, a cohesive multi-cultural elite which will allow them to rule over us behind a universalist mask.
The truly fascinating thing, from an anthropological perspective, about the 1930′s changes within the Communist party was that these changes involved the composition of a relatively small group of people – sixty or so – who knew and interacted with one another. All of them shared a powerful universalist and anti-nationalist ideology that demanded a multi-cultural elite.
But once these people from different backgrounds began struggling for power within that elite, a wondrous thing happened. The dominant nationality – the inner party – was exiled or killed in a series of purges that eliminated them from the upper reaches of power.
So then the question arises whether this result was a random event – one that would not necessarily be replicated under similar circumstances – or whether it was an inevitable result of the friction generated by the differing evolutionary psychologies of the participants. Did those different methods of thinking and communicating inject a modicum of mistrust into a tense environment in which small amounts of mistrust were fatal? Powerful support for this thesis can be found in “Stalin’s Letters to Molotov” Lih, Naumov, and Khlevniuk (Yale University Press, 1995). See especially pp. 18 – 26.
To the particularist within the inner party, the question is best framed by asking if these purges were one more proof that Theodor Hertzl was right? Or more universally, does professor Kevin MacDonald’s thesis have overarching predictive power in the real world of political affairs?
Or in the words of the ole Ygg, – Is this idea of a multi-cultural elite just an inner party delusion?
The Jewish Encyclopedia states that the inner party did quite well in the Soviet Union until 1948 – the beginning of the cold war – and that anti-semitism wasn’t a factor in Soviet life until then. And while it is true that the inner party continued to occupy a hugely disproportionate number of desirable occupations and positions within the Communist party until 1953 (The doctors’ plot), their exclusion from the upper-most reaches of power had been completed by 1938 or 1940.
The mystery is why the organs of the inner party fail to attribute this earlier displacement to anti-semitism.
Given the stakes involved, and given that this first displacement enabled the second to begin in 1948, the silence is deafening. It is the quintessential blackout.
In an attempt to get answers I began re-reading Anatoly Sudoplatov’s “Other Tasks.” Sudoplatov was in charge of the assassination of Leon Trotsky, an inner party competitor of Stalin’s who had been exiled to Mexico. Ideally, there should be no better source of insight than an insider who participated in the events of the time.
But like the first time through, Sudoplatov disappointed. He and his co-authors, a son entitled through his mother to Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return, and Jerrold Schecter, the inner party Moscow bureau chief for Time Magazine, obviously feel no obligation to provide a convincing explanation of the events which set the stage for the anti-semitic purges of the inner party nomenclatura from 1948 to 1953. He attributes it all to Stalin’s personal ambition and insecurity, giving no special note of the near uniform ethnic identity of those purged prior to 1940.
In frustration, and as if by fateful accident, I picked up Walter Sanning’s revisionist classic “The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry,” a book I have owned for some time but never read, to see if it contained any clues.
Sanning’s essential thesis is that, because of the well documented evacuation of Jews from Western Soviet territories prior to Germany’s attack in 1941, Germany never had more than about 3.5 million Jews under its control from 1938 through 1945. Given the 900,000 to one million Jews alive in the camps at the end of the war, the maximum number that could have been killed appears to be about 2.5 million and not six million. Sanning then goes on to produce a number of very complex estimates and calculations in an attempt to show that the number unaccounted for after the war was far less than 2.5 million.
To my surprise, I found buried within Sannings work the “holy grail” – hard statistical evidence of how communist society actually worked – its very core and essence exposed for all to see! Surprisingly, Sanning himself apparently missed its true significance.
In preparation for war with Germany, Stalin build huge factories in Siberia – half of them empty – to supply his war effort if Germany should thrust into Russian territory and capture it. In addition, he developed plans for the movement of manufacturing equipment and the evacuation of key industrial personnel in the event that the industrial cities in Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, the Baltic republics and Western Russia should be captured. The publicly stated idea was to preserve Soviet industry in the event of successful attack and to deny that industrial capability to the Germans if the Western Russian territories and republics should be overrun.
But, of course, there was a second unspoken purpose to this evacuation program as well. In this evacuation approximately 55% of the urban or city population was evacuated along with the industrial machinery.
The entire rural or agricultural population was left for the Germans to capture along with about 45% of the urban population.
Ok, so who stays and who goes?
Answer that question and you have captured the essence of communist society – its actual deeds and not its words. From page 81:
“Ukrainians were a minority in their own cities; only 47.4% of all city people in the SSR Ukraine were Ukrainians and the remaining 52.6% were largely accounted for by Russians (25%) and Jews (23%). Both of these latter two nationalities occupied most of the important positions in industry, party and administration; in the eyes of the Ukrainians they represented the long and heavy hand of Moscow. The entire grotesque situation is depicted in the professional structure of the Ukraine’s pre-war population:”
When the Germans “liberated” the Ukraine, they found a decapitated society, largely incapable of producing the essentials of civilized life, or indeed, of feeding themselves. In the words of a German officer responsible for performing a quick census [page 62]:
“The Russian and Jewish upper classes withdrew together with the Red Army. The leading Ukrainians have been partially deported and, if they held leading positions in administration and industry, they were also forced to move east of the Dnieper. Numerous tractor and other specialists on the countryside met the same fate. In June, many young men were called up and put in garrison in the interior of the USSR…. Because of this development there is a tremendous scarcity of people capable of assuming responsible positions in administration, industry and agriculture in the Ukraine…”
Similar patterns of packing minorities into the upper middle classes of the ethnic republics can be seen in the Baltic Republics (Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia) as well as Belarus.
Indeed, it appears that the very essence of Communism is ethnic manipulation and population transfer. It is a pattern that holds true even at the top of the communist party structure. In the early days following the revolutions of 1917-1918, none of the top officials in Moscow were ethnic Russians. In fact, a large number grew up in New York. Most of the top leaders felt compelled to change their names to conceal their ethnic origins. Among the first politburo, inner party members like Leon Bronshtein (Trotsky), Hirsch Apfelbaum (Zinoviev), and Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev) felt compelled to change their names. Lenin himself was a mix of German, Swedish, Jewish, Kalmyk (Asian) and Russian ancestry – the very poster boy for a world in which nationality had been abolished – or so it would seem. Nevertheless, the inner party had a compelling need to cover up his ancestry and paint him a pure-bred Russian (instead of the grandson of a well-to-do Jewish Doctor).
At the center in Moscow it was Georgians (Stalin, Beria), Latvians (Berzin) and Ukrainians (Kruschev) supported by a large cast of inner party members who shape party decisions by controlling the information flow. In the ethnic provinces the local administration consisted of ethnic Russians along with the inner party members.
The entire Communist system was based on manipulation of race and national origin for control – and the central mechanism for maintaining that control was decapitation – the extermination or the mass transfer of the leaders of an ethnic group, and the total dependence of the remaining native population upon imported or native minorities who managed the government and the business enterprises and dominated the learned professions.
The important point is that all forms of inner-party communism, the violent Bolshevik variety and the newer “democratic socialist” variety invented by the Frankfurt school, direct their demographic engineering effort at the elites – not the ordinary working people.
The sine-qua-non of inner party power is a multi-cultural elite alienated from its tribal and racial kinsmen.
It is the native elites – the indigenous leaders who might resist the inner party’s drive for power – that are always the target.
To the inner party, the masses of any nation are at all times totally irrelevant to their goal of acquiring and keeping power. The masses of the nations were important in the Soviet Union as labor, a fungible factor of production in an economic system focused on output. The Marxist concept that each hour of their labor was of equal value tells you all you need to know about the inner party’s regard for them.
And in war time, the masses were readily abandoned, as the real nation proved to be a relatively small and mobile alliance of minorities and uprooted majority careerists.
For the reform version of communism developed by the Frankfurt School that now dominates the ‘liberal democracies” and the NWO, the masses of the nations are important as consumers – cogs in the machinery of debt creation and credit card impulse purchases. The masses of the nations are to be manipulated by television and opinion polls – Annie the Analyzer of Radio Project fame and focus groups to pre-test manipulative messages.
What remains relevant to the inner party are the inner party’s potential competitors, the native national elites with community ties to their brethren.
In the Soviet Union, the inner party elites (using Lenin and Stalin as their cover) resorted to murder and forced resettlement to remove the native national elites, a fast, direct and brutal form of decapitation.
In the “liberal democracies” the inner party uses a slower and less visibly brutal method of decapitation. Thus, in the liberal democracies of today we have “affirmative action” – a set of laws that places tremendous pressure on private businesses to displace native elites at the top with minorities who will be less plausible targets of discrimination lawsuits. These laws exist everywhere in the European world, and with the exception of the U.S. were enacted long before any significant minority constituencies (other than the inner party itself) existed to lobby for their passage.
The entire program of displacement and decapitation within the liberal democracies was carefully drawn up and explained in “The Authoritarian Personality” by Theodor Adorno, et. al.(1950). It is a prescription for identifying any person who displays any bond of obligation to his own kind and the will to resist those who threaten the interests of his kind.
Such “authoritarian personalities” are to be denied university admission and consigned to low status occupations, which is precisely what the laws of affirmative action and social rules of political correctness accomplish.
Indeed, as I read the tables from the 1939 Soviet census published in Sanning’s work I recalled my own research showing that the inner party, representing 2.4% of the U.S. population comprises 28% of the student body at Harvard, while the descendants of European Christendom comprising 70% of the population supply only 28% of the students. The American Majority has been effectively displaced at Harvard. Relative to their share of the Population, they have 2.4 times fewer students than do the inner party’s Afro-American coalition partners.
In the top 15 national universities in the 1997 ranking by U.S. News, the results are similar. The inner party has 22% of the students, while the descendants of European Christendom have only 32% – roughly half of their share of the population.
The United States Department of Labor has maintained a tracking study of 12,000 young people who were between the ages of 14 and 22 in 1979 known as the National Longitudinal study of Youth (“NLSY”). The CD Roms with all the data can be purchased from Ohio State University. These data show that at each given level of IQ (all participants were tested) the income and educational attainment of the descendants of European Christendom is much lower than for Blacks, Hispanics and Inner party members of the same IQ.
In what will surely be a surprise to most middle and upper middle income Euro-Americans, the effects are most pronounced at the highest IQ levels. In other words, it is the majority elite that suffers the widest disparity in income and education when compared with Blacks, Hispanics and Inner Party members within the same IQ range. When the effects are broken down by sex, we find that among males the disparity is most pronounced in the highest IQ ranges and disappears entirely by the time you descend to the 50% mark. The widest disparity exists among the top 2% of the population (those with IQs above 130).
Majority males with IQs below 100 earn the same or slightly more than their Black, Hispanic and Inner Party counterparts.
It is among the female descendants of European Christendom, those most likely to support “affirmative action”, “women’s liberation” and the other demographic engineering efforts of the inner party, that we find the widest and most shocking income disparities. Among females, the disparity is not confined to the top half of the IQ spectrum, but persists from top to bottom at consistent levels at each IQ range.
Indeed, if one were to view these data as the result of a purposeful system, then the object of the multi-culturalist enterprise is clearly two fold – first to displace and disadvantage majority males at the top of the IQ spectrum and second, to exploit majority women from top to bottom. At each level of IQ they are paid dramatically less than their Black, Hispanic and inner party counterparts with the same IQ.
Displacement of majority elites might not be as complete in the U.S. in 1999 as it was in The Soviet Union in 1939, but the trend is clear and runs in the same direction.
Indeed the most important data reproduced in Sanning’s little book are tables setting forth the demographic composition of towns and cities in Central and Eastern Poland and statistics on the distribution of occupations from a 1931 Polish census:
These tables are important because Poland was not a part of the Soviet empire at that time, and the demographics did not result from Soviet policies of forced removal and forced decapitation as they did in Eastern Ukraine.
The data shows that in eastern Poland (which, along with Moldova, Belarus and Western Ukraine [the "Pale of the Settlement"] formed the very cradle of the inner party) the Polish majority population had existed in a “decapitated” state in 1931, and almost certainly for the preceding 200 years as well. These areas were owned and governed by a thin class of nobles sharing supposed ethnic and religious kinship with peasants consigned to the poverty of agricultural labor. A majority of the middle class and an overwhelming majority of the professional occupations were held by the inner party ethnic minority.
Viewed from the perspective of these statistics, it seems that European Communism (in its orthodox Bolshevik form as well as its reform “liberal democratic” variety) is a thinly disguised effort to force upon the entire European World the ethnic status and occupational relationships existing in Eastern Poland and the Pale of the Settlement at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution – relationships in which the inner party had a commanding share of the middle class and professional occupations and a ready supply of shiksas as servant girls – relationships which guaranteed the inner party safety because economic life and the tax base which sustained the nobles would collapse without them.
Indeed, the emancipation of the serfs and the industrial revolution presented a profound threat to their comfortable world of ethnic dominance. The new factories brought hundreds of thousands of very rough and threatening peasants to the towns and cities. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the inner party got warning of peasant revolts because the peasants had to gather in the countryside and march to the towns. Because of the industrial revolution, these dangerous people lived right next door and attended the same schools.
In the words of Irving Howe, in “World of Our Fathers” p. 21:
“The emancipation of the serfs had a damaging effect on those Jews, not large in number but still important in the Jewish economy, who had worked as agents of the nobility or as economic middlemen disposing of the peasants’ produce. Jewish petty officials and traders tended to be squeezed out, and as a result many rural Jews were compelled to seek employment in the cities.”
To make matters worse, out of every million Polish peasants drawn to the cities and educated in the schools, twenty thousand had IQs above 130; and over 160,000, a full 16%, had IQs above 115, matching the distribution of IQ of the top half of the inner party. It was a nightmare. The inner party could easily be displaced. It was no longer indispensable. In fact, some of these peasants actually started factories of their own and became wealthy. Being only one or two generations off the farm, there was always a threat that they might use this newfound wealth to organize their fellow peasants.
The Inner Party developed ideologies of “human equality” as weapons to preserve the status quo ante. According to this ideology, intelligence was a product of the environment, which justifies socialized, middling incomes for the peasants. Socialized incomes mean middling environments, which, in turn, justify the attribution of equal and middling intelligence to their children. This ideology provided the moral cloak that would allow the inner party to exclude the children of these new arrivals from the schools and universities they controlled (including the art academy in Vienna), and confine them to middling occupations. Each hour of their labor was worth the same, thus stripping the talented of any means of upward mobility and depriving them of any opportunity to compete with and displace the inner party. For the unwashed new industrialists there was the progressive income tax and the inheritance tax, all designed to prevent them from converting economic power into political power.
The entire program stood in militant opposition to Horatio Alger’s “Struggling Upward.”
The demonstrably false beliefs of liberalism, which appear so perverse and illogical to loyal opposition conservatives, serve a very rational and logical purpose once you take the trouble to answer the question “how will these principles be applied in practice, and who benefits?”
And it is trouble indeed if you have the temerity to answer that question in public.
For the demonstrably false ideologies of liberalism are all essential to the program of keeping the nations of the world in an impotent and leaderless state.
In the orthodox Communist model, the inner party grabbed power by force. To the extent that the talented children of peasants were needed to administer and manage an increasingly complex society, they were transferred to some alien place where they would not identify with the local peasants and could not stir up rebellion based on ties of kinship or nation.
In the reform model of Communism adopted in all liberal democratic societies, power was seized more slowly, by breaking the chains of the genetic and religious isolation imposed upon the inner party by Orthodoxy, and by mixing aggressively with the potential leaders of the nations and aggressively influencing their social and cultural perceptions. By this means, the inner party placed itself in a blocking position within the culture and the arts so as to prevent expressions of racial and national awareness among the native elites. In addition, the inner party recognized that accepting lower returns on their investments in the press and the media was the least costly and most effective means of converting economic power into political power. This strategy guaranteed the inner party a blocking position sufficient to prevent these organs of public opinion from being used to organize the new arrivals from the countryside to challenge the inner party.
Once the industrial revolution rendered the closed and ethnically stratified society within the Pale of the Settlement untenable, there arose a passionate commitment to the “open” society, an ideological construct in which individual upward mobility would be extolled in words, but would be prevented in fact by central economic planning and high marginal tax rates, and where “freedom of thought and expression” would be extolled in words, but where massive social and economic pressure would be brought to bear on any thought or expression that identified the speaker as an “authoritarian personality.”
It was essential to identify the talented newcomers and then alienate them from their roots just as the Polish nobles had been alienated. Like the nobles, majority elites could be taught contempt for their less prosperous brethren, and liberated from any sense of ethnic or racial obligation by attacking the traditional religious faith they shared and replacing the moral restrictions and obligations of those traditional religions (that had preserved them over the centuries) with the vices of the cosmopolitan city packaged in ideologies of “freedom” and “choice”. Again, those who resist the blandishments of vice and degraded culture are called bigots, homophobes, fundamentalists, racists, etc. and are banished to occupations in which they have no power or influence.
The central reality of Communist action is racial and ethnic engineering. It is all slaughters and mass transfers of various Christian nationalities behind a universalist mask which denies even the slightest consciousness of these nationalities’ existence.
The program continues to this day. Cuban exiles in Miami tell me that the population of Cuba was 70% white in 1956. After 40 years of Castro’s Communism, it has fallen to 30% (in their estimate). Like Lenin, Castro is, according to his daughter Alina, an inner party half-breed.
By now you should be asking, what does all this have to do with undergraduate admissions at Princeton?
As it happens, the answer is, a great deal.
At the beginning of this post, I asked whether the idea of a multi-cultural elite was just an inner party delusion. I suggested that the ease with which Stalin maneuvered the inner party from power might be a warning that this idea of a multi-cultural elite may be a chimera.
Indeed this is the central thesis of Benjamin Ginzberg’s masterpiece “The Fatal Embrace,” in which he argues that the philo-semitic posture of the native elites in the U.S. is conditional and will last only so long as these elites continue to benefit from their philo-semitism and liberalism.
Implicit in the act of writing and publishing that work is the idea that these native elites no longer benefit. Ginzberg gives us a stunningly detailed and frank portrait of the process by which the inner party seized political power in the U.S. and he marvels at the ease with which it was done. So easy in fact that Ginzberg suspects a trick, namely, that governmental power may no longer be as relevant or significant as it once was, and that controlling government, if not a waste of time, might be dangerous because of the potential for mistakes and blame.
In any event, aside from the followers of Theodor Hertzl, who have forthrightly volunteered to plow the fields and sweep the streets of their own nation, the rest of the inner party desperately wishes to continue its charmed life free of such chores and has adopted (perhaps in response to the experience with Stalin) a decentralized strategy of acquiring and keeping power through private activity.
As I mentioned in the previous essay “what it would take to cleanse Serbia”, a necessary consequence of this strategy is a multiplicity of unplanned and conflicting initiatives driven by visceral emotion – a fertile field for the very visible blunders and mistakes which Ginzberg fears.
A second drawback of that strategy is that the laws of demographics and large numbers apply in spades to the exercise of power through private activity. The fact that the number of inner party kids enrolling at Princeton has fallen from 18% in 1973 to 9% in 1995 is very significant news. In 1973 the inner party filled about 45% of the seats at Harvard. In 1997 they filled only 28%.
Even more stunning is the statistic that “Jewish students represented only 6.3 per cent of the freshmen at private colleges in 1996, down from 16.8 per cent in 1973, according to a survey of freshmen conducted annually by the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles.”
The inner party faculty members at Princeton suspect invidious discrimination – and this despite the fact the the President of Princeton is an inner party member. So once again we hear the primal scream of the inner party with its hands on the reins of power: – If only we were really in charge!
But the reason for the decline is much simpler and more obvious.
I checked the NLSY-1979 sample (a group that has mostly completed their child bearing years), and it appears that the fertility rate for inner party females is a dismal 1.2 per woman (it is a very small sample so the possible error is in the 15 to 20% range). For the descendants of European Christendom, the number is 1.6 – a troublesome number but much better than that of the inner party.
The reason that there are so few inner party kids at Princeton is that the kids are not being born in the first place.
Professor MacDonald argues that the evolutionary psychology unique to the inner party is so strong that no amount of out-marriage and no degree of infertility will threaten their group survival nor change the essential characteristics of the group. However, the issue here is not group survival (an outcome I concede as readily to the inner party as to every other race or nation on earth – there is room for all of us!). The issue here is power – and more specifically the inner party’s ability to hold political and social power based on a strategy of displacing native elites.
It is a collective and cumulative political power that is ultimately dependent on numbers.
The consequence is clear. A complex society requires a large number of intelligent people to manage its functions. To exercise power effectively with a decentralized displacement strategy you need large numbers – numbers sufficient to place representatives in every office to spot and censor every instance of politically incorrect thought and behavior.
The smaller the numbers, the more difficult control becomes.
While Professor MacDonald may be right that a small and intense core of the inner party can reproduce itself; nevertheless, it is equally clear that the strategy of fanning out into and controlling an “open” society by corrupting the culture has poisoned the inner party at the same time.
Sir Arthur Keith was the first to recognize that the extension of the ideals of compassion, equality and brotherly love beyond one’s own tribe or racial nation (where they are necessary for collective survival) and the universalization and application of those ideals to all of mankind inevitably means that such ideals are being used as aggressive tools of retribalizing elites engaging in hostile, race forming behaviors intended to set themselves apart as a separate class from their kinship group, while rendering members of their kinship group unsuspecting deracinated targets. Modern liberalism always has a subconscious malevolent driver.
And indeed this central insight of Keith’s makes him more dangerous to the inner party than any other social critic of this ending millennium. It justifies his academy award level blackout treatment as well as the heavy posthumous doses of slander and calumny which he will wear as badges of honor forever. For Keith’s analysis tears the Marxist mask from “class conflict,” thereby conferring automatic moral legitimacy on any future “peasant revolts” while making clear what programs must be followed to restore nature’s order and prevent an immediate recurrence of the multi-cultural disease.
And indeed, portions of the small, native Polish middle class (along with native elites throughout Europe) were indeed attracted to the Marxist ideology as a means of “managing” the mass migration of peasants to cities.
Thus, the theoretical underpinnings of Marxism – environmental determinism of ability, equality of reward for work, and central planning and allocation of opportunities and rewards, were perfectly rational as weapons to forestall the threat of upward mobility and displacement inherent in the migration of peasants to cities in the industrial revolution. Further, it was perfectly rational for the inner party to spread these doctrines among native elites as a means of preserving their dominant position.
If you are a tiny minority elite living scattered among your host, prosperity is only assured by acquiring the power to retain your own rent seeking position within the economy and not by producing generalized economic growth and prosperity for all.
Thus, orthodox Marxism was remade into its reform variety, wherein ethnic and racial identity is used to motivate minorities to join political coalitions with the inner party as a means of controlling political outcomes in the “liberal democracies.” Reform Marxism also requires immigration of additional minorities as a means of augmenting inner party political power. This basic strategy of ethnic and racial engineering for political advantage is reinforced by a system of punishment for any form of explicit racial defense among the majority European group. These punishments consist of social and economic sanctions that now exist throughout the European world, as well as laws criminalizing all such expressions in all European countries except for the U.S. and Russia.
This mirror image of the orthodox Communist program, adapted to democracy, is completely rational from the perspective of the inner party.
But that part of the reform Communist program which seeks to estrange the outer party European elites from their racial kinsmen by corrupting them is fraught with danger – dangers that are quite obvious in retrospect. And it is this part of the program that has split off a small group of inner party dissenters known as neo-conservatives.
Before the inner party decided to undertake a public campaign to seduce the outer party elites though prosperity and vice, it should have checked to make sure its own members had taken the vaccine!
This is especially critical when power depends on numbers. Before it began its attack on Christianity and its promotion of “women’s liberation” and “alternative life styles” such as unmarried motherhood, lesbian and gay lifestyles, and self-absorbed childless yuppie consumerism, it should have carefully shored up its own cultural defenses.
And as the falling numbers of inner party college students attest, the inner party has no vaccine. Truth be told, they never even thought through the consequences before the onslaught began. It is another one of those inner party delusions driven by visceral emotion.
There is one central and overwhelming aspect of this attack in particular that should have caused the inner party to reconsider. For seducing the outer party elite to vice could only be accomplished with the image of the Aryan, blonde female flooding through an endless stream of advertisements and movies over 50 years. As sir Arthur Keith noted, ethics are a tribe’s rules of survival. If you can destroy those ethics you can destroy the tribe or race.
But Keith also noted that aesthetic preferences and images of beauty and sexual attraction are equally important to group survival. And when the inner party sought to destroy our ethics and morals by drowning us in exceptionally rare and beautiful images of the blond Aryan female, they made a classic mistake.
While recoiling viscerally at the implications of Darwin’s idea of natural selection, the inner party neglected to consider carefully the mechanisms of that selection. Within human groups, sexual selection is by far the most important mechanism, more important than mortality from disease, starvation or combat. Ironically, by dramatically decreasing mortality from disease and combat, modern life has made sexual selection paramount. Prior to the inner party attack, Christian ethics restrained the effects of sexual selection. The attack opened the floodgates.
Call it the survival of the prettiest.
Unwittingly, the inner party has dramatically accelerated the pace of natural selection.
When my teenage daughters compare themselves to the ideals thrust upon us by the inner party media and advertising moguls, models such as Claudia Schiffer and Heidi Klum, they realize that they do not quite measure up. But at the same time they instantly recognize that they are visibly of the same tribe as those stars – tall, slender and light hair. They are second round draft picks, which is about as good as it gets in the real world away from the Hollywood images.
But once the typical inner party teenage girl from Brooklyn discovers how totally enthralled the inner party boys are by these Aryan images, she knows she is doomed. The ones who look like young versions of Madeline Albright or Dr. Ruth Westheimer must lower their sights, or, like Monica Lewinski, accept the most demeaning of competitive poses.
Most fly like moths to the flame of women’s liberation, thereby politicizing the personal, blaming failure on impersonal societal forces (which is indeed true, relative to the reproductive success that they would have enjoyed back in the Pale of the Settlement before World War I), and finding comfort in the company of others similarly situated.
The average consequence shows clearly in the fertility numbers.
The inner party attack is a disaster for us and a worse disaster for them. Who knows; perhaps they really believed those idiotic studies conducted by Franz Boaz in 1911 which argued that immigrants heads changed shape shortly after arrival on these fair shores.
Indeed, the Aryan ideal of female beauty is overpowering. Ben Stein writes a “life and style” type column in the neo-conservative American Spectator. In one column he recalls a stroll on the Venice Beach boardwalk and a chance encounter with a shockingly beautiful blond Slovak or Romanian girl on roller skates. Stein comments that he wanted to take over the INS and admit only girls who looked like her. A darker treatment of the power of this same image can be found in Eldridge Cleaver’s “Soul on Ice.”
But there is a second aspect of this aesthetic conditioning that is never discussed – except perhaps in my own writings, and that is its effect on majority males.
In a tribal or pre-industrial society, the ideas of aesthetic attraction we are born with are influenced and refined exclusively by the real women we actually see in our neighborhoods. The slave boy in the dialog The Meno, was shown a puzzle by Socrates and taken through two erroneous proofs. He recognizes their falsehood after hearing explanations by Socrates. But the slave boy instantly recognizes that the third proof is correct and defends it against later sophistical arguments against its validity. So too, the presentation of rare Aryan images of female beauty are “true” to young majority males. The endless repetition of that image gives it supercharged power.
The exact dimensions of this phenomenon first struck me when I saw a brochure produced by some National Alliance boys at the local University. They had selected for the cover of their brochure an incredibly beautiful, slender blond woman playing with her two preschool children. There were no words or argument. None were needed. It was simply understood that this image was under attack. It was this image that they and their organization were fighting to defend. In hoc Signo Vincet.
It was a very effective brochure.
Ironically, they lifted the image from an ad published by the local phone or electric utility. The commercial advertiser knew that this image would cause customers with a particular evolutionary psychology to identify positively with the company and buy its products.
What I had not clearly recognized before was the obvious; – that this aesthetic image of beauty propounded by Hollywood has created for millions of young white males an image of our race that has never before existed.
If you stop and think about it, a race is a very difficult thing to conceptualize. It is quite doubtful that any humans carried around an image of their race in their heads prior to the twentieth century. After all, there is a great deal of individual variation within the extended tribe, and humans cannot conveniently synthesize mental images of thousands of their varied kinsmen into a unified whole.
In the past, they carried images of different looking strangers, but not a single unified image of themselves as a race. Indeed, you can search European literature and find scant mention of the idea of race until the 19th Century. And even then, race was defined only in reference to the different look of the stranger. The stranger is a specific type. Be WE are not a race. Rather, WE are the one true universal man, and those alien others are “races”.
In this sense, race is a uniquely modern idea. In the past, all humans (with the exception of the inner party) whether organized by tribe or nation defended a territory. Patriotism demanded sacrifice for the defense of a strip of land from which the tribe or race obtained sustenance. In the past, we did not carry around in our heads a uniform aesthetic ideal of beauty we were defending. Our own death and defeat did not deprive life on earth of a living aesthetic symbol of overarching and transcendent value.
Inadvertently, the inner party bosses of Hollywood and the advertising industry, with explicit theoretical blessing from the Frankfurt School, have given us something unique. It is an image of our future, the map of our evolutionary destiny. It is the image of what we can collectively become.
It is an image that has replaced territory in its power. It is an image that millions of young males would fight and die for.
And that, folks, is not particularly good news for the inner party.
I should also note a second process of de-territorialization that has potential consequences.
The vast majority of successful business executives I met during my working career were, like myself, essentially two generations off the farm. We all thought of ourselves as sophisticates when it came to identifying the interests of the business and defending those interests in the political process. But in the pit of our stomachs, we all viewed the political system as alien, mysterious, irrational and dangerous. In truth, none of us had a clue how it really worked or even the right questions to ask.
Like me, many of these executives were plucked from the wrong side of the tracks by the standardized test, moved about the American Empire hither and yon, landing in corner offices in our own de-territorialized diaspora of the glass towers.
Like all Europeans of Christian heritage, our own evolutionary psychology is bound up in the defense of land. For thousands of years, large hosts have periodically gathered and invaded. We needed to develop and encourage the skills of violence and war to defend against such hosts. But we also needed habits of courtesy and civility so that we could maintain good relations with hundreds of neighboring tribes over a large enough area to encompass an army sufficient to defeat the largest alien host.
And we needed a sense of obligation, duty and loyalty to those neighboring tribes so that we could respond to an attack on their land as if it were an attack on our own.
But as a byproduct of success in the modern world, we have become de-territorialized. The proof is in white flight to the suburbs. When our surroundings become unpleasant we vote with our feet and flee. It is the South African “chicken run” in which flight defines us and territory is repeatedly abandoned.
But when we flee, we are fleeing to a gathering of people very similar to ourselves. The statistics say that only about 12% of American women can afford to stay home and raise the kids. And as a guilty participant now in a number of “chicken runs” I must tell you that the women who manage to land a job as “stay-at-home mom” are a shockingly uniform bunch. They can be seen walking with their young children during the day in expensive new suburban developments, and I must stay that they are uniformly slender, tall, and very attractive. Their husbands, on the other hand, are good deal less uniform in appearance but probably just as uniform in their earning power.
When life gets unpleasant we flee not to a place, but to that image. And yet we are torn by our own evolutionary psychology and the deep betrayal that the chicken run implies for the less fortunate left behind.
In the process of de-territorializing us, filling our heads with alien multi-culturalist philosophies, and destroying our traditional culture, the inner party has inadvertently created an even more powerful replacement as the object of our desires and defensive impulses.
Without realizing it, the inner party has implanted deep within our psyches an easily visualized and universally embraced image of our future and our potential.
The reaction will be swift and cataclysmic once cultural decay directly and visibly threatens the de-territorialized chicken run enclaves in which the image is now become deeply enshrined.
In the twentieth century, we Europeans of Christian heritage nearly destroyed ourselves in two immensely destructive wars to expand or defend our land based empires. One can argue whether the encouragement we received in this madness from the inner party was conscious of the destructive consequence. But one thing seems clear. We have been de-territorialized to the point that we are most unlikely to participate in any similar disaster in the future.
But the combative instinct still exists. Its object is in the process of being transferred from the defense of land to the defense of a people. Thanks to the inner party, we all know clearly what it is we will defend. What we lack in our de-territorialized diaspora, is a uniform vision of the triggering threat.
In the old days, the sight of an armed host on the horizon would provoke an immediate and unanimous response. But in our new diaspora, we all have individual thresholds for action.
As reluctant as I am to hand to the snooping agencies in Washington another flag to wave at Congress come budget renewal time, I am nevertheless constrained to remark that an inevitable consequence of our slow process of de-territorialization is our growing awareness and understanding of the borderless war.
Without going into excessive detail, imagine a time 20 years from now when working age populations are falling throughout the entire G-8 plus China, worldwide demand is falling (in 1999 it is merely stagnating), and in the U.S. the baby boom generation has already begun selling their stocks to support themselves in retirement and has driven prices to 40 year lows in the process. The boomers are becoming desperate about support from Social Security. Tax revenues are falling and La Raza has started a guerrilla war of secession in the southwestern U.S. Our institutions no longer have the resources to buy them off. Similar low intensity conflicts bubble from time to time in our cities. Imagine also that a solid 10 to 20% of the majority population now has a clear picture of the threat and is committed to jury nullification on behalf of their defenders.
And suddenly there are two thousand Eric Rudolphs running around loose with lists of meaningful targets. The original Eric Rudolph severely taxed the system. Several hundred at once would overwhelm it.
It is becoming increasingly clear that politicians and political institutions are constrained by the forces around them. There is no need to attack or threaten those political institutions. They are as irrelevant in this particular borderless war as the military and the police. Only very tiny minorities lurking in the shadows support bombing defenseless countries into submission to impose a multi-cultural ideology. Only tiny minorities in the shadows work towards displacement of majority elites and racial and ethnic engineering. These people cannot even describe these activities in public without crippling their program. Given the issues involved and the utter lack of public support for them, the programs of ethnic displacement and culture destruction are “personnel dependent” and will simply go away as soon as the personnel working them go away.
Reshape the forces in the shadows (either by competition or by conflict) and suddenly a different kind of politician wins office and different messages flow from our media.
The process could be largely invisible to the great mass of sheeple, and need not inconvenience them in any significant way.
A fundamental frailty of government by wire-puller is that it functions flawlessly as long as the stakes are financial favors to special interests. As long as the stakes are limited to money, the wire-pullers can remain safely in the shadows.
However, ethic displacement and culture destruction are just too heavy a load to place upon the system. The stakes are too high. In the information age, the participants who are using the system for such a purpose can be identified and located with relative ease by the victims, and the government cannot protect them at public expense without exposing them and the reasons for their protection to a much wider base of the population. Any attempt to guard them would make clear in the most graphic, physical and intrusive way the distinction between the controllers of government and the facade of government.
Further, it is unlikely that the government can figure out who to protect. A quick perusal of some of the data tells me that a large fraction of the relevant players cannot be identified by ethnic origin (despite my use of the term “inner party” in an exclusive ethnic sense heretofore in this essay).
Further, self-identification is impossible because there are millions of paranoid and ideologically overdosed people who would want expensive armed escorts. Many of the most important players would not self-identify, because, as any good evolutionary psychologist would predict, they are in denial about what they are doing.
And so we wait and watch.
In between now and that hypothetical scene 20 years from now, the U.S. will need to educate a far larger number of intelligent young people to run our complex society than the upper middle class, with its disastrously low birth rates, has produced. Our society is going to have to do a much better job of finding and motivating the 50% of our kids in the U.S. with IQs above 130 who do not attend college.
Inevitably it will involve combing the hills of West Virginia and East Tennessee, as well as Iowa, Nebraska and Utah. Our society will have to search these haunts for high IQ just as diligently as it now does for fashion models and actresses.
We shall see how the inner party adjusts.






An outstanding essay, Yggdrasil, full of some very thought-provoking ideas. The ‘native elites’ amongst us will soon have to choose sides between supporting a corrupt inner party, which is rapidly losing control of the situation, and defending their own racial kinfolk from bands of roving feral animals, let loose upon them, by the very same inner party. Like the British troops fighting in far-off Afghanistan seeing the destruction of their hometowns by rioting Negroes; the native elites amongst us will be forced to decide whether the rewards of money and status being paid to them by the inner party, override the viseral sight of seeing their ancestral homelands being burned to the ground.
Plutocratic elites will always choose what made them elites in the first place. Money. Not at the level of nation, nor group, but at the widest only family, and in many cases individually, only. That is how the goy socalled “elites” are controlled, through their slavish worship of Mammon, which is controlled by Jewry.
Our elites dont give a tinker’s damn about any ancestral homelands or any of that stuff. Dollar signs as incentive, or imminent impoverishment and pain as disincentive.
They vote their pocketbooks too; the ones who vote democrat do so out of fear of the poor; and the ones who vote republican do it out of fear of the one major religion that is not controlled by their Jewish masters, which is evidently Islam. It should be Christianity too of course but that’s a story for a different day.
And why would any socalled native elites bother with kids, who are expensive, and become hostages to the world. Why not just indulge selfish worldly desires and satiate them with money.
Racists are going to have to figure out the motivational factors of groups a lot better than they have already. Because the first motivators of money and vanity and selfishness are all under jewish monopoly. We are gonig to need other motivators and the purely material world will no more supply them than it did before the rise of religion in the first place.
well, somewhat dazzling and tantalizing and certainly brilliant. will have to re-read of course.
The only disagreement so far is that social democracy was around from at least ca. 1875 or so with the German SPD, I think it was called, and Prussian Socialism had a contribution, as well as the various leftish intellectuals from Fabians to Tory socialism to anarchism and assorted idealists like Tolstoy and so on.
Still, the Plan B for the inner-party fits most of the apparent facts, perhaps in tandem with Egalitarianism and White racial Openness to strangers…..it has been around for a long time. It was Whites who tore down the Jewish Ghetto Gates with Napoleon and the Enlightenment. That was a mistake, but one of many by Do-Gooding Whites.
And we have the evolutionary psychologists like, indeed, Kevin MacDonald, who have offered an explanation of how Whites might have acquired such Openness to Strangers over the last several millennia in the European boreal regions of ice and snow and cold generally….that we did not have to compete for land, or for resources and therefore learned to cooperate with other bands of our race. And, that we were never subjected to collectivizing by large scale agriculture, thus selecting for traits of individualism and (relative) trust of others.
These traits have become our Achilles’ Heel. We are promiscuously Open, etc . to Enemies.
On the theme of White genetic weakness to Universalisms, and re Ginzberg’s , The Fatal Embrace, which I read a few years ago, the two came together in yours truly when I encountered The Fatal Embrace, and had to put it down because of its cynicism and Realpolitic. This is one of the most anti-semitic books I have read. Of course, it is socio-biologically correct and for that one cannot criticize Jewry, but just mark them as our number one Enemy.
Yggdrasil’s comments on the inner-party’s adoption of universalist ethics/equality, is splendidly coming back to bite them in the Left’s near total condemnation of Israel. This in itself ought to dispel any thoughts of Jewish invulnerability.
Ditto their mass entertainment ploy that has inadvertently enshrined the Blonde Beauty on the Halfshell as icon of racial inequality… conscious, or not quite.
Re the putative abandonment of physical space/territory, this is problematic, but I noted yesterday in the NYT a story on Lancaster (I think it was), California, a suburb of Los Angeles where in over the last 30 years, a once White town has had its Whites reduced to one-third, with muds, many on Section 8 housing, running the place into Third World character. I suggested, only half in jest, that since these Whites have probably lost their home equity, that they simply leave town after setting their homes to the torch. That would be a City on a Hill message to the inner and outer party folks which would be burned into their psyches.
So, if the Jews thru very low birthrates, and growing awareness of the Ginzberg thesis, that too close an embrace of the State has historically led them into unpleasantness, then what do they do? Neoconservatism is blowing up in their faces. Now what?
btw, Sanning’s revisionist book on The Dissolution of European Jewry, I read, but while the argument is convincing, I was and am not convinced that the statistics are reliable.
If by “statistics” you mean his detailed calculations of the number of Jews actually killed, I tend to agree with you. However this essay only uses those statistics that Sanning copied from the Polish census of 1931 and the Polish census of 1939. Those statistics are accurate.
Hi Ygg, I sent a previous post, a longer one, did I screw that up and not post it, or did you decide not to post it? Joe
Good point about the quantity. They might also be having problems with the quality. In Richard Lynn’s on Jewish intelligence he estimates the Israeli Ashkenazi Iq at 106. That is at the NE Asian level. He explains the low estimate on the immigration of half Jewish Russians and the mislabeling of Sephardi. Could the average be getting lower here?
“Good point about the quantity. They might also be having problems with the quality.”
You are right to raise the quality issue. This article was written in 1999 – twelve years ago – and I believe the quality issue came to light in the middle of the past decade. But my impression is that the quality issue is largely confined to Israel, although it could also be an issue in diaspora.
“The mystery is why the organs of the inner party fail to attribute this earlier displacement to anti-semitism.
Given the stakes involved, and given that this first displacement enabled the second to begin in 1948, the silence is deafening. It is the quintessential blackout.”
It is quite interesting that 10,000 books have been written and 100′s of movies made concerning Hitler and the Jews, yet nary a one about the changing of the Jewish guard, within the Kremlin. Stalin always had lots of Jewish women about, and even married one; Lazar Kaganovitch’s sister. Kaganovitch was Stalin’s point man in the genocide of 10 million Ukrainians, during 1932-33. I don’t recall too many movies about that event, either…
An interesting article, in particular as regards the inner machinations of soviet society and the parallel of hard totalitarianism (communism) as portrayed by Orwell (1984) vs. a Huxley (Brave New World) soft totalitarianism as evinced in liberal democracy, alternate strategies working towards similar political ends, namely the subjugation of majority elites, etc.
Noteworthy of course is the fact that even Jewish genetic interests fall prey to the strategies deployed to further their own causes, as you carefully indicate. A sword is two sided and can well enough cut both ways. Perhaps a far more poignant example exists with the examination of our own Western Christian identity which throughout the middle- ages and into the early phases of the 17th century served our genetic group interests as a point of coalescence and ethical awareness, but now provides the bulwark for the universalist liberal democratic nostrums driving us towards extinction.
Politics, the question of sovereignty and certainly most particularly in an age of social democratization, becomes the mere reflection of our collective metaphysics (Schmitt: Political Theology). Hence, we must understand that it is a Christian moralism undergirding the tenets of the liberal universalist project that form the nexus to understanding the rather bizarre phenomena of a group survival strategy circumvented by an egalitarian ethics working towards our own self destruction. Given centuries with which to ferment in such an anti-biological soil, is it any wonder our own people serve as the primary drivers of our own destruction. Perhaps we give the Jewish elite too much credit, after all, it took very little effort to convert a flawed theological moralism into a political creed which whites’ were all too greedy and willing to accept.
Outstanding post!
As you know, secular egalitarianism was born in the European Enlightenment beginning in 1720, and was very much driven by loss of belief in the divinity of Christ. Once faith was gone, the secular slag left over was inevitably deadly.
Calvinism held that the elect (0r chosen) would be known by their works and deeds on here on earth. Because divine salvation is an entirely individual thing, the lapsed Calvinist branch of Enlightenment intellectuals adopted a radical form of individualism as its secular ideology. Secularized Calvinism quickly became Darwinism and Capitalism with no group restraints whatsoever.
The second strain fixed upon the spiritual notion that all men are equal in the eyes of God but, no longer believing in God, determined that equality of actual outcomes here on earth must become a moral imperative enforced first by the Guillotine and the Gulag, later by graduated taxes and the welfare state – and then, when mass transfers into the European world of third world populations were undertaken but failed to live up to expectations (of the deluded), by numerous schemes to subordinate and miscegenate the White race down into equality, thus satisfying the egalitarians’ secularized moralist impulse.
So one must be careful when blaming the religion of Christianity, as opposed to its secular excrescences.
In Kevin MacDonald’s speech in Sweden he mentions that Northern Europeans have an overdeveloped sense of moral obligation borne of thousands of years of survival along the northern ice sheets, where survival very much depended on careful reciprocal behavior for any kindness shown by neighbors in the winter, and that reputation for “being good” had immense survival value.
In short, our evolutionary psychology is to be very moralistic and judgmental of those who are not good and do not display reciprocal behavior.
In a recent phone conversation with Kevin, I noted that our ancient pagan religion was not moralistic at all, and that Christianity almost certainly triumphed over our pagan gods precisely because it was so much more moralistic. He agreed.
Indeed, science did not destroy Christian belief during the Enlightenment. Rather it was our innate moralistic sense that was offended very profoundly by the slaughters of the religious wars in the 16th and 17th Centuries between the proto-national tribes that adopted different flavors of Christianity. Thus it was our native sense of moral outrage which demanded that the intensity of Christian belief be diluted in order to produce civil societies that lay behind the secularization of the Enlightenment.
And the Enlightenment intellectuals invented new – and very dangerous – substitutes for intense Christian belief to occupy our moral sensitivities and to satisfy our need for public display of righteousness, provoking ever increasing bloodshed and destruction from the French Revolution, through Napoleon, to our intensely moralistic civil war against the South, then through the rest of the 19th and 20th Centuries, and now reaching a crescendo in the last quarter of the 20th century and into the 21st with the destruction of the White race through multiculturalism.
The only strategy that will save us is the propagation of memes portraying multiculturalism is the essence of evil, and that the discrimination, dumbing down and ethnic cleansing that will be inflicted on our children and grandchildren is entirely the product of an evil obsession with secular equality and its wildly immoral crusade of multicultural genocide.
The impulse to moralistic posturing and preening is immense among our people. As Kevin noted in our phone conversation, all of his academic colleagues have this overpowering need to think of themselves as saints, and an equally powerful need to have others think of them as saints. Thus, they stage elaborate public displays of piety and faith in all the latest egalitarian ideological fads.
Once Western man has some minimum level of security, status needs drive most of his behavior. We must give our people a new sense that their grandchildrens’ survival is a compelling moral imperative, and that the immorality of their subordination to the evil and destructive forces of multiculturalism must be opposed with a new moral crusade. We must show them acceptable public displays of our new morality that will, among like minded people, convey status.
And most important, we must make them feel guilty for failure to oppose such an unspeakable evil as the multicultural attack.
Anything else will be a waste of our time. Appeals to group interest and individual self interest will not carry the day.
And I have good news on this front. If you carefully examine many of the more popular WN leaning web sites, you will notice a steadily increasing moralistic tone leaking into the posts. This is all to the good. We must work to push the envelope of this already existing trend.
It is the only way we can win. It is the only way we can stop this ongoing and incredibly evil holocaust of the White race.
“The only strategy that will save us is the propagation of memes portraying multiculturalism is the essence of evil, and that the discrimination, dumbing down and ethnic cleansing that will be inflicted on our children and grandchildren is entirely the product of an evil obsession with secular equality and its wildly immoral crusade of multicultural genocide.”
I agree, the time for tolerating those amongst us, that would poison the well that we all drink from, must draw to an end. The time has arrived where we must circle the wagons, draw a line in the sand, and proclaim “is what you’re doing good for our people, or are you part of the problem?”
“The only strategy that will save us is the propagation of memes portraying multiculturalism is the essence of evil, and that the discrimination, dumbing down and ethnic cleansing that will be inflicted on our children and grandchildren is entirely the product of an evil obsession with secular equality and its wildly immoral crusade of multicultural genocide.”
“Diversity will be the death of us all”
A ponderous reply, thank you…
Ignoring or white washing the direct link between the advance of certain damaging aspects of Christian morality (undifferentiated egalitarianism) with its powerful magnification upon the current political landscape runs the risk of failing to offer a proper diagnosis and hence an erroneous analysis of our current predicament.
On the other hand, as you intimate, the situation calls for a great deal of strategic tact given the fact the majority of our people, including most residing in occupations of prolific power remain attached to a direct belief in the religious narrative undergirding said morality, not to mention those, who having abandoned the actual faith never the less continue to believe and defend the same morality often more passionately than the concrete believers. A frontal attack upon the religion that has done so much to facilitate our predicament runs the obvious risk of alienating the very people we hope to save.
One is reminded of Heidegger, when upon entering a Cathedral performed a minor symbolic ritual which caused surprise amongst a few non-believers who were accompanying him. He responded by illustrating the respect one must give towards a people’s belief and sacrifice. One finds in this a fine example of the ability to separate the objective manifestation of a powerful archetype (in this case the Christian religion) vs. the offensive attributes such a religion might possess.
Your suggestion that a “propagation of memes portraying multiculturalism as the essence of evil “ is undoubtedly a good one. The problem may arise however in the actual execution of such a strategy. Fashioning psychologically “moral” tools to fight fire with fire seems intuitively accurate but faces the challenge of how to judo flip an extant morality whose entrenchment lies buried within our centuries old religious/progressive struggle towards liberty, freedom and equality. To once again acquire a moral high-ground that serves our people’s inclusive genetic interests without offending their archetypal religious convictions calls for a bit of wizardry not yet within our focus.
We might have been able to work around this obstacle with some ease had we been able to check our slide from a restrictive republicanism to a liberal democracy, but alas, this remains part and parcel to the aftermath of the prior centuries battles against the totalitarian state and dilution of our creedal wars.
We’ve simply veered too far to the left and perhaps left the road entirely behind us. It’s likely to prove far more difficult spinning out of this swampy marsh wherein so many find a degree of lethargic comfort, than it was to get out of the pouring monarchial rain. The latter required the breaking up of the religious archetypal forces (the splintering into multiple denominations,- Koselleck), whereas the former (our current swampy predicament) will likely necessitate transcending it altogether (Jung), in short, the call for a bit of maturation into a higher awareness/consciousness.
Wow! You describe an assault on the capital, a capture of the king, and overthrow of his secular religion and all of its temples.
We do not need to do anything like that.
We just need to recruit many more people than we are now by attracting those who are more comfortable struggling for fairness and moral reasons rather than crude group or (heaven forfend) individual self interest. To assert self interest as a reason for protecting Whites is to admit that you are one who loses out to anti white discrimination – a confession of low status.
If we give our people a way to join our cause for reasons of justice, fairness and morality, we open up our recruiting to much larger numbers of our people who need a marker of positive status and a way to feel that they are good people, rather than forcing them to confess to a marker of negative status and to feel bad about themselves.
And in all probability we only need to get to 10% before we reach a tipping point:
http://news.rpi.edu/update.do?artcenterkey=2902&setappvar=page%281%29
After all, we want the capital, the king and his temples of secular equality all to survive just long enough to take the blame for the catastrophe that approaches.
And as for institutional Christianity, it is a timid follower. It adapts to the attitudes of the people. It will adapt its message to fit our new morality as soon as there are enough potential parishioners to fill a few churches. And then it will grow like wildfire.
Hey! This ain’t about philosopy! It is about the evolutionary psychology of our people and successful marketing to that evolutionary psychology!
This is a fascinating article, and helps fill in more detail to my understanding of the problem. Thanks for posting it. But I have some disagreement with the arguments of your commentary thread.
I’m aware that pushy, aggressive behavior materializes as ‘good intentions’ with the sanctimonious Left, and sometimes the Right as well, as people seek to vault themselves higher up a social status pyramid. But the Enlightenment was not a wrong turn. Rather it is the proof that White Culture is superior and the validation of our separatist effort. Its aspirations for human freedom, and welfare, and not merely survival, are the highest achievement of human political consciousness. So it merits protecting from dominant alien systems.
The object of segregation and nationalism, for me, is to secure the safe environment of Enlightenment values for our children. There’s no philosophy, or psychology, that can adequately replace it.
Hey!!
Shifting the subject a bit here, has anyone looked at the map of the pale of the settlement and noticed that the countries within it – those which lived under Jewish domination of the professions, education, trade and the arts for the past two hundred years – Western Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Eastern Poland and Lithuania – are the poorest and lowest achieving White nations on the planet.
Notably worse off than West Virginia or Kentucky.
Coincidence or inevitable result?
Discuss amongst yourselves!
I am familiar with these territories. The Jews used to call that area Yiddishland and for a good reason. No other place in the world in the past had such a large concentration of Jews and nowehere else in the past did the Jews experience such a high level of tolerance as in these territories. This is how one 17th century (or maybe early 18th century) traveller described the situation in Poland (which at that time was much bigger and comprised of parts of Ukraine, Belarus etc): Heaven for nobles, Paradise for Jews, Hell for peasants. Nowhere else in Europe was the life of peasants as miserable as it was in those parts of Eastern Europe. In Western Europe peasants were exploited only by the nobles. In the said places of Eastern Europe they were exploited by two exploiters: nobles and Jews.
Jews lived in Poland for almost a thousand years. Today they like to describe Poland as one of the most anti-Semitic places on earth where life for the Jews was terrible. This is non-sense. This is simply not true. Poland is a good example of a country where the elites – in this case the so-called nobles – had more respect for foreigners than their own people. In fact, the Polish elites became so estranged from their own people that they believed themselves to be descendants of other people than Slavs, of the so-called Sarmatians.
Polish nobility gave the Jews (many of them refugees from Western European countries) rights of which the latter could only dream of in other places. In the social ranking Jews had a privileged position. They stood lower than nobles, of course, but much higher than Christian peasants. A Jew who converted to Christianity could easily become a noble. A Polish nobleman could marry a Jewish woman if she converted to Christianity. A peasant was doomed to be a peasant. Peasants in fact were only a little better off than slaves.
The corruption and exploitation as well as the misgovernment of the privileged classes and their agents (Jews) was so strong that the whole country eventually collapsed and…disappeared from the map of Europe. This happened in the second half of the 18th century.
The situation in the 19th century was not any better, at least not for common people. The nobles – Polish nobles in this case – partly lost their power. They were now under a foreign rule: Prussian, Russian, Austrian. It was a good time for Jews to start to replace the former elites. And that’s what happened. Eventually, Prussian, Russian and Austrian governments abolished feudalism in the former Polish territories and it should have been good for the common people but it wasn’t. It wasn’t because now Jews were becoming the elite.
I didn’t know that Serbia is a racial state.
Serbian Single Men To Marry 250,000 Asian Women?
http://dalje.com/en-world/serbian-single-men-to-marry-250000-asian-women/177603
Absolutely brilliant Ygg.
As a man married to a fourth generation Muscovite, I’ve often pondered the purges of IP members during the 1930s. I think one thing you leave out is the psychological disconnect that existed after 1948, where ethnic Russians basically were maintaining a kosher template that they had inherited from alien designers. In other words, it’s a strange thing, that ethnic Russians would continue to maintain and extend an alien ideology that was so out of touch with their civilization.
Some argue that the same can be said of Christianity as being a Jewish template maintained and extended by non-Jews, but I don’t think it’s true since Christianity from the get go was particularly un-Jewish in its ethos. Where Judaism was identified by ancient writers like Tacitus and St. Paul as the enemy of the whole human race, Christianity was just the opposite; a humane and benevolent religion that did much to civilize and elevate Europeans.
As anyone who’s lived in urban area knows, non-Jewish liberals usually conceal a pretty strong, visceral anti-Semitic side. They use the kosher template as their big vision, but most have spent enough time seeing Jews up close, such that they develop a distaste for them on a personal level. The most trenchant anti-Semitic remarks I’ve ever heard came from liberal activists that I knew in my personal life.
Still, even if Jews were to slowly be removed from the elite circles here in America, we would be left with the same scenario of 1930s Soviet Russia: A non-Jewish, deracinated ethnic elite carrying out a big Jewish plan forged in the mists of the (recent) past. Because the elite are out of touch with their own ethnic greatness as a result of being sequestered and fully educated in Judaism, they remain quasi-Jewish converts doing the work of the actual real deals.
I think this Judaizing effect on whites goes far in explaining the rabid self-hate of Europeans and European-Americans among its elite. It’s not simply a question of white altruism being turned against its own ethny, but rather of Judaized converts, having been raised in a vat so to speak, continuing the activities initiated by the kosher class.
I might stretch it further and say that this seems to be the case more generally for Jewish history. It uproots and alienates a host population’s creme-de-la-creme and then lets its goloms carry out the long range plan over time.
An outstanding article in many ways, although I think it’d have benefitted from less use of the word “Aryan” and more use of “White” or “European” in the part about the advertising industry’s strong blonde beauty image.
Seeing how the mainly Jewish powers have severely poisoned even their own tribe with cultural degeneration, I have to shake my head in disbelief: What the hell have they done?
Handskakning
“Our elites dont give a tinker’s damn about any ancestral homelands or any of that stuff.”
They select, use and promote intelligent White sociopaths who are prepared to betray their people for money. Those same sociopaths would betray the Jews in an instant if that became a better option or possibly even just for the hell of it.
Because they’re sociopaths.
This would have been largely true in the Soviet Union as well. They selected, used and promoted highly intelligent Georgian, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Russian etc sociopaths as their auxiliaries.
They created a political organisation filled with a mixture of Jews and highly intelligent White sociopaths.
Doh!
That’s a very interesting article.
The use of the term “inner party” is pure obscurantism and, even if this was written over a decade ago, it should be updated to simply say “Jew” or “Jews” rather than “inner party.”
“In between now and that hypothetical scene 20 years from now, the U.S. will need to educate a far larger number of intelligent young people to run our complex society than the upper middle class, with its disastrously low birth rates, has produced. …Inevitably it will involve combing the hills of West Virginia and East Tennessee, as well as Iowa, Nebraska and Utah. ”
Today the elites are “manufacturing” high-IQ allies by importing them from abroad. Pakistanis, Indians, Koreans, Chinese, etc. Look at major universities in the United States and you can see how they are becoming hugely overrepresented. This new multicultural elite, which has been engineered from the start, will be wholly enthusiastic about carrying about the continuing displacement and ethnic cleansing of American whites. Maybe this process was not apparent in 1999.
Dear Sir:
This is the first article I have ever read of yours, and the first time (I believe) I have ever visited your site.
I am utterly stupefied.
This one longish article (as with the preceding one, linked at the beginning of the post) encapsulates (for me) over twenty years of reading, prayer, searching, study, and the desire on my part to ‘note the players’ and hopefully thereby, to come to some conclusions about why ‘the center does not hold’, ever since the invasion into Serbia under Clinton, Albright and Kanne Clark!!
To say I am utterly bowled over, is an understatement of massive redundancy.
As a a) Yankee, b) Anglo, c)Protestant ex-Romanist, who now (in late middle age), has become d) [Eastern] Orthodox, e) unreconstructed (at least intellectually) f) a cleric, and g) the possessor of a Doctorate, while finding myself increasingly unemployed…..
I – having studiously avoided ANY reading or study of Marxism, Marxist thought, or Marxist cultural theory (in the well-intentioned, but naive concern of my later mother, that I might be tainted by it) – now find (like Dorothy in MGM’s Wizard of Oz) that the answers were ‘all in my back yard, anyway,’ and I never knew it!
I wondered why Clinton was killing Orthodox Christian Serbs; why he launched his attacks on Orthodox Good Friday (a day different from the West’s observation of the holiest day in the church’s Kalendar year); why NATO and the US sided with the Bosnian MUSLIMS; why they gave to the Hagarenes the holiest sites in all of Serbian Christian History; and why this was a ‘good thing’????
Now I know fully, the reason why. Moreover, now that I know WHY they did it, I will ‘never forgive, and never forget’ and ‘teach these things to your children, that their days may be long in the land the Lord THY God [Nature's God] hath given THEE….and [unto] our posterity,’ as the Founding Documents say. (Bible, Constitution, Declaration)
Coupled with Bp. Photios Farrell’s tome, ‘God, History, and Dialectic,’ and the recent study of the necessity of restoring an ‘ethnobiologically aware Churchmanship that predates the rationalist, and filioquist West’s muck-up of viable Christianity (by Andrew Fraser, in his recent book, ‘The WASP Question,’) this set of articles should be studied at every conservative think tank there is- whether College, Church, Bible Study group, or kaffeeklatsch. I will make sure to pass this on to my clerical and collegial colleagues, to aid in that effort.
Many Years, Sir. MANY Years!
P.S. Have you written any books I might purchase?
“Further, it is unlikely that the government can figure out who to protect. A quick perusal of some of the data tells me that a large fraction of the relevant players cannot be identified by ethnic origin (despite my use of the term “inner party” in an exclusive ethnic sense heretofore in this essay).”
I suspect, it’s not so much a case of the government, (on a generalised note, Western governments), might not be able to figure out who to protect, it’s more likely a question of what non-White ethnic identity or multi-ethnic identities succeed in totally usurping by infiltration, one and/or all Jewish & native White-led Western governments. Herein, lies the real danger.
The inner circle being the Bilderberg /Rothchild dynasty and its subordinate offshoots will, no doubt, already have in place, a well planned & funded strategy of protection for such an eventuality. No Hussein/Gaddaffi outcomes for them if they can possibly prevent such a scenario.
“Further, self-identification is impossible because there are millions of paranoid and ideologically overdosed people who would want expensive armed escorts. Many of the most important players would not self-identify, because, as any good evolutionary psychologist would predict, they are in denial about what they are doing.”
But, the vast majority of them are known to the little people, ie, those they are trying to exterminate!!!! Round up a few of these operatives and give each a little incentive to talk, they’ll almost certainly start singing like hysterical canaries.
When any all-encompassing totalitarian regime starts collapsing, it usually sets about eliminating its former obedient puppets in the mistaken belief that it can somehow save its own skin as long as it leaves nobody behind that could be bought by the incoming victorious regime thus divulging all that they have been privy to or picked up including names etc, since it’s not unknown for victorious regimes to later go after officials of defeated regimes even pursuing them across the globe.
1.
“Further, it is unlikely that the government can figure out who to protect. A quick perusal of some of the data tells me that a large fraction of the relevant players cannot be identified by ethnic origin (despite my use of the term “inner party” in an exclusive ethnic sense heretofore in this essay).”
I suspect, it’s not so much a case of the government, (on a generalised note, Western governments), might not be able to figure out who to protect, it’s more likely a question of what non-White ethnic identity or multi-ethnic identities succeed in totally usurping by infiltration, one and/or all Jewish & native White-led Western governments. Herein, lies the real danger.
The inner circle being the Bilderberg /Rothchild dynasty and its subordinate offshoots will, no doubt, already have in place, a well planned & funded strategy of protection for such an eventuality. No Hussein/Gaddaffi outcomes for them if they can possibly prevent such a scenario.
“it’s more likely a question of what non-White ethnic identity or multi-ethnic identities succeed in totally usurping by infiltration, one and/or all Jewish & native White-led Western governments. Herein, lies the real danger.”
Which ethnic identities do you have in mind?
“The inner circle being the Bilderberg /Rothchild dynasty and its subordinate offshoots will, no doubt, already have in place, a well planned & funded strategy of protection for such an eventuality.”
Elaborate???
kingcobra
“Which ethnic identities do you have in mind?”
I’m surprised, you even need to enquire!
At the moment, our native homelands are predominately under the control of Zionism and our bought-and-paid-for indigenous traitors.
However, by way of example, the Cult of Islam is being allowed to increasingly creep in the back door. Those who are agitating with menaces for more and more privileges with a view to usurping our indigenous laws and cultures thus being enables to take over our ancestral homelands, are alien races of non-White background. They, of course, also comprise a large assortment of non-White ethnicities.
Outside of this, there are continuous examples of various other groups belonging to several separate non-White belief systems and cultures also agitating for control over whole swathes of our ancestral homelands. It has to be brought to and end through compulsory repatriation.
“Elaborate???”
Since it is an inescapable fact that Europe and her enclaves including the United Kingdom will become totally overwhelmed by Third World invasion and colonisation well before the end of the present century unless drastic steps are taken to reverse this certainty, the result is going to be the collapse of European civilization altogether with widespread deprivation and an uncontrollable and endless crime wave of the most unimaginable savage and brutal proportions not experienced perhaps since the medieval era, all of which is part of the New World Order plan, by the way.
Those who brought this catastrophe and already commenced boodbath about will have fled the sinking ship that is Europe and her enclaves, for Israel.
The present day deliberately organised international banking fraud being currently perpetrated against Western taxpayers and investors, form the majority element of the funds previously alluded to.
The simple unvarnished truth is that the Internationalists are losing. Their opportunity to quietly “Kill the Hundredth Monkey” has passed. As their methods of repression become ever more strident, they have become ever more transparent and more and more are awakening to the truth. When caught in such a lose-lose situation they have historically sought to divert the people’s attention through that most despicable but effective devise—war. The total war that would now be required, that is an all-out nuclear exchange, does not suit their agenda and the “little” wars with only a few hundred thousand dead have had the unintended effect of actually pulling back the curtain even farther. In de-funding the space program they have sealed their fate, for when all is said and done the only place they can hide is called—Mars.
You’re a genius. This post is outstanding. Thank you.